Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

Analysis-Big Oil’s bid to woo ESG investors fails to impress

letizo News

Published

on

Analysis-Big Oil's bid to woo ESG investors fails to impress
© Reuters. The sun sets behind an oil pump outside Saint-Fiacre, near Paris, France March 28, 2019. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann/File Photo

By Simon Jessop and Tommy Wilkes

DUBAI (Reuters) – A COP28 pledge by energy majors to reduce their emissions is not enough to convince many sustainable fund managers to include the companies in their portfolios because it omits pollution from the use of oil and gas, six interviews with Reuters show.

The pledge by 50 of the biggest oil and gas companies at the U.N. climate talks in Dubai commits to reaching near-zero methane emissions by 2030 as well as net-zero carbon emissions in their energy use and production by 2050.

Those Scope 1 and 2 emissions from the companies’ own operations account for about 15% of the total associated with the companies. The pledge does not address Scope 3 emissions caused by the use of the fuels the companies produce that account for 85%.

Although some of the energy companies had already made promises ahead of the COP28 announcement, several state-owned firms have newly joined in.

Investors in socially responsible, often known as ESG (environmental, social and governance), funds, said the commitments were overdue and not enough.

Asset manager Candriam said it would stick to excluding major oil and gas companies from its socially responsible funds because none was aligned with their preferred scenario for meeting the objectives of the Paris Agreement on climate change. The agreement calls for limiting global warming to within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit), and aims for a 1.5C limit.

Meeting that goal requires cutting global emissions by 43% by 2030 and to net-zero by 2050.

“The transition to a low-carbon world does not mean producing the same volume of oil and gas in a more carbon efficient manner. It means shifting away from fossil fuels as the main energy source towards low-carbon energy,” Alix Chosson, lead ESG analyst at Candriam, said.

The COP28 talks, hosted by OPEC-member the United Arab Emirates, have attracted a record attendance from the oil and gas industry while delegates are divided over wording on the future of fossil fuels.

‘STEP FORWARD’ BUT NOT FAR ENOUGH

ESG funds have long wrestled with how to approach conventional energy producers.

Some exclude them out of scientific principle. Others say divesting has no impact and it is better to try and persuade them to pollute less, which means making them responsible for Scope 3 emissions.

Kamal Bhatia, global head of investments at Principal Asset Management, said fossil fuel companies without energy transition strategies do not “environmentally 100% meet the definition” to be included in pure ESG funds.

At an industry dinner in Dubai last week, Leon Kamhi, head of responsibility at asset manager Federated Hermes (NYSE:), said the companies’ pledge announced at the talks was a “big step forward”, but not enough.

Only one – Italy’s Eni – of the 25 biggest oil and gas companies is aligned with the Paris Agreement, according to Carbon Tracker’s assessment.

SHIFTING ECONOMICS

As war in Ukraine sent fossil fuel prices soaring, ESG fund holdings in the sector increased. At the same time, a cost of living crisis in many parts of the world shifted the focus away from sustainable investment and back towards the most easily achieved shareholder returns.

The proportion of U.S.-domiciled sustainable open-ended funds and exchange traded funds that owned oil and gas stocks hit 49% in September, against 43% three years earlier, Morningstar data show. Among conventional funds, the share with oil and gas holdings rose to 68% from 45% over the same period.

But as energy prices weaken, funds’ exposure to oil and gas is also shrinking.

The average exposure to oil and gas stocks for the U.S.-domiciled funds hit 1.86% in September, versus 2% in late 2022, a faster rate of decline than for conventional funds, which had 5.3% exposure in September, according to the data.

Funds marketed as sustainable in the European Union saw average exposure to oil and gas fall to 2.43% in September, from a peak of 3.33% in late 2022, the data show.

Sustainability-minded investors have achieved little when trying to influence oil giants as stakeholders, U.S. billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer told Reuters in Dubai.

“A bunch of people have bought into Exxon to try and change it, and Exxon’s response was to spend [on buying a rival],” he said, referring to ExxonMobil (NYSE:)’s $60 billion deal to acquire Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:).

“It’s very important to recognise how hard it is to change 100-year-old corporate cultures,” he said.

MISSING RENEWABLES

For some ESG investors, the case for investing in the energy giants has been weakened by the realisation “oil and gas companies are not going to become renewable energy companies”, Global Head of Sustainability and Transition Strategy at U.S. bank Jefferies Aniket Shah said.

Oil and gas companies have cut spending on production in favour of shareholder payouts. Of every $10 in cash spent in 2022, less than $5 went into capital expenditure, compared with $8.6 in 2008, the International Energy Agency calculates.

By comparison, the amount spent on low-carbon capital expenditure last year was 10 cents of every $10.

That has created credibility issues the COP28 commitments are unlikely to dispel.

“If a certain energy provider is communicating ‘we are now really going for a different form of source and delivery’, then the trust really has to still develop,” said Gunther Thallinger, chair of the U.N.-convened Net-Zero Asset Owners Alliance and board director at Germany’s Allianz (ETR:).

Commodities

Energy, crude oil prices outlook for 2025, according to Raymond James

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — Raymond James analysts provided a cautious outlook for the energy sector in 2025. 

Despite energy’s underperformance over the past two years, the midstream group emerged as a bright spot in 2024, with the Alerian/AMNA index surging 37% and Raymond (NS:) James’ midstream coverage group up 41%.

Geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and recent Middle East confrontations, have had little impact on oil market fundamentals. 

“Oil price volatility continues to be driven by rather old-fashioned supply and demand factors,” the analysts note. 

They highlight mixed messages from OPEC and weak demand from China as key contributors to the current market uncertainty. Additionally, the strength of the U.S. dollar, particularly around the U.S. election, is also exerting downward pressure on oil prices.

Looking ahead, Raymond James forecasts West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude to average $70 per barrel in 2025, slightly above the futures strip, with carrying a $5 premium. 

In contrast, U.S. prices are expected to average $4 per Mcf, significantly higher than current futures prices.

A notable theme for 2025 is the continued impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the energy sector. 

“AI remains the number-one story in the energy sector,” Raymond James states. “Accommodating this incremental demand will take an all-of-the-above strategy: gas, renewables, and – in certain circumstances, and with very long lead times – nuclear as well.”

“The energy sector currently sits at only ~3% of S&P market cap, but investor sentiment still remains above pre-COVID levels. That being said, near-term uncertainty regarding the commodities (namely oil) has left investors with little conviction at the moment,” concluded the firm.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Oil prices rally 3% as US hits Russian oil with tougher sanctions

letizo News

Published

on

By Shariq Khan

New York (Reuters) -Oil prices rallied nearly 3% to their highest in three months on Friday as traders braced for supply disruptions from the broadest U.S. sanctions package targeting Russian oil and gas revenue.

President Joe Biden’s administration imposed fresh sanctions targeting Russian oil producers, tankers, intermediaries, traders and ports, aiming to hit every stage of Moscow’s oil production and distribution chains.

futures settled at $79.76 a barrel, up $2.84, or 3.7%, after crossing $80 a barrel for the first time since Oct.7.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose $2.65, or 3.6%, to settle at $76.57 per barrel, also a three-month high.

At their session high, both contracts were up more than 4% after traders in Europe and Asia circulated an unverified document detailing the sanctions.

Sources in Russian oil trade and Indian refining told Reuters the sanctions will severely disrupt Russian oil exports to its major buyers India and China.

“India and China (are) scrambling right now to find alternatives,” Anas Alhajji, managing partner at Energy Outlook Advisors, said in a video posted to social network X.

The sanctions will cut Russian oil export volumes and make them more expensive, UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said.

Their timing, just a few days before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, makes it likely that Trump will keep the sanctions in place and use them as a negotiating tool for a Ukraine peace treaty, Staunovo added.

Oil prices were also buoyed as extreme cold in the U.S. and Europe has lifted demand for , Alex Hodes, analyst at brokerage firm StoneX, said.

“We have several customers in the New York Harbor that have been seeing an uptick in heating oil demand,” Hodes said. “We have seen a bid in other heating fuels as well,” he added.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A pumpjack operates at the Vermilion Energy site in Trigueres, France, June 14, 2024. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File photo

U.S. ultra-low sulfur diesel futures, previously called the heating oil contract, rose 5.1% to settle at $105.07 per barrel, the highest since July.

“We anticipate a significant year-over-year increase in global oil demand of 1.6 million barrels a day in the first quarter of 2025, primarily boosted by … demand for heating oil, kerosene and LPG,” JPMorgan analysts said in a note on Friday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Precious metals, energy sectors seen gaining at least 10% in 2025 – Wells Fargo

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com – Macroeconomic challenges facing commodities in the first three quarters of 2024 have reversed and become tailwinds entering the new year, according to analysts at Wells Fargo (NYSE:).

Elevated interest rates and broader economic uncertainties weighed on commodity prices over the January-to-September period last year, although that trend largely turned around in the fourth quarter, the analysts led by Mason Mendez said in a note to clients published on Monday.

Commodities in general delivered a modest performance in 2024, they said, with the Bloomberg Commodity Total (EPA:) Return Index clocking a 4.5% year-to-date increase as of Dec. 26.

“While supply conditions remained supportive of higher prices, commodity demand was held back by global economic headwinds,” the analysts wrote.

That tepid demand is seen improving in 2025, becoming a possible spark that ignites an uptick in commodity prices, they added. However, they flagged that the supply side “should not be forgotten.”

“After two years of lackluster commodity prices, many commodity producers have slowed production growth,” the analysts said. “This could become a particularly acute point in 2025 in the event that demand recovers at a stronger pace than most expect.”

They noted that new commodity output often lags demand “by months, and sometimes years.”

Among individual sectors, the analysts said they are most keen on precious metals, such as , and energy, with both expected to gain at least 10% in 2025. This would exceed the return the analysts expect from the mid-point of their 250-270 target range range for the broader Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

Gold, in particular, experienced a turbulent end to 2024 due in part to caution around more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, which contributed to an uptick in nominal and real bond yields that dented the appeal of non-yielding bullion.

Still, the yellow metal jumped by around 27% annually to close out the year at $2,625 per troy ounce, and the prospect of more Fed rate reductions — albeit at a possibly slower pace — could continue to boost its appeal, the Wells Fargo analysts said.

They set a target range for gold prices at $2,700-$2,800 per troy ounce this year.

Energy, meanwhile, is tipped to benefit from greater demand as global economic conditions improve, the analysts forecast. is tipped to be between $85-$95 a barrel, while crude is seen at $90-$100 per barrel. Oil prices dropped by around 3% in 2024, weighed down partly by a sluggish post-pandemic recovery in global demand.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved