Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

How Devon Energy missed out on the US oil and gas mega-deal wave

letizo News

Published

on

By David French and Arathy Somasekhar

(Reuters) – U.S. oil and gas producer Devon Energy (NYSE:) has lost bids to acquire at least three of its peers in the last 12 months because its shares were spurned as acquisition currency, according to people familiar with the negotiations.

Devon missed out on the sector’s dealmaking boom by losing to ConocoPhillips (NYSE:) the $22 billion deal to acquire Marathon Oil (NYSE:), failing to beat Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:)’s $12 billion bid for CrownRock, and unsuccessfully courting Enerplus (NYSE:) before it was sold to Chord Energy for $3.8 billion, the sources with knowledge of the matter said.

Like its peers, Devon has turned to dealmaking to gain scale as it drills more of its existing acreage. It has struggled to clinch an acquisition as higher drilling costs and production issues made its stock less attractive to acquisition targets, the sources said.

Most recent big deals in the sector, including Exxon Mobil (NYSE:)’s $59.5 billion acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:) and Chevron (NYSE:)’s $53 billion agreement for Hess (NYSE:), have been all-stock.

All-stock offers help reconcile price disagreements with acquisition targets whose shareholders are reluctant to cash out for fear energy prices may sharply rebound, but are happy to roll their stakes in a deal because they want to stay invested in the combined company.

Acquisition targets were skeptical, however, about the value of Devon’s stock, the sources said. Devon’s shares have underperformed the S&P 500 Energy index by 16 percentage points in the last 12 months, LSEG data shows.

Andrew Dittmar, principal analyst at energy consultancy Enverus Intelligence, said the weakness in Devon’s stock put the company at a disadvantage to rival bidders for companies.

“They had less room to offer premiums and bid-up asking prices without potentially making the deal financially-dilutive to themselves,” Dittmar said of Devon.

A Devon spokesperson declined to comment. In the company’s first-quarter earnings call last month, CEO Rick Muncrief said Devon had a “very, very high bar” on the acquisitions it would pursue.

“Can we find something that makes us stronger? Then we would consider that without a doubt,” Muncrief said.

Founded in 1971, Devon operates in shale formations that include the Permian basin of Texas and New Mexico, the Eagle Ford (NYSE:) in south Texas, and the Williston basin in North Dakota. The company has a market value of about $30 billion.

The doubts Devon’s recent acquisition targets harbored are striking given the strong performance of its stock in the wake of its last major deal. When Devon combined with peer WPX Energy (NYSE:) in a $12 billion all-stock merger at the start of 2021, the company went on to be the best-performing stock in the that year.

Yet despite Devon’s strategy of running a tight ship and returning cash to shareholders, the production issues and higher costs have undermined investor confidence, and the market has more recently fallen out of love with Devon’s stock.

The problems with production included a fire at a key gas compression station in Texas in January 2023, which knocked the facility offline for a number of weeks.

NEW TARGETS

To be sure, Devon’s failure to bag a deal is also a function of its price discipline as an acquirer, as well as heightened competition for assets in the sector, according to the sources.

Some of the companies Devon failed to buy were pricey; Marathon Oil and Enerplus sold at an average premium to their undisturbed share price that was around 3 percentage points over the average premium paid for U.S. publicly listed oil and gas companies since the start of 2023, according to Enverus data.

“Some people feel like when one company does a deal, their competitor needs to do a deal, but smart companies judge every transaction on its merits,” said Kevin MacCurdy, director of upstream research at investment advisory firm Pickering Energy Partners.

Were Devon to give a potential acquisition another shot soon, investment bankers and analysts say logical targets include Permian Resources, Matador Resources (NYSE:), and privately-owned Mewbourne Oil, all of which would bolster its Delaware basin footprint. Alternatively, if Devon wants to reinforce its Williston basin position, it could target privately held Grayson Mill Energy, which Reuters reported is considering sale options.

Buyout firm EnCap Investments, which owns Grayson Mill, declined comment. Permian Resources, Matador Resources and Mewbourne Oil did not respond to comment requests.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A pump jack operates at a well site leased by Devon Energy Production Company near Guthrie, Oklahoma September 15, 2015.  REUTERS/Nick Oxford/File Photo

Bryce Erickson, who leads valuation consultancy Mercer (NASDAQ:) Capital’s oil and gas group, predicted a deal for Devon was only a matter of time, given the company has managed to overcome many of its production issues.

“Real or imagined, from my chair, there is a sort of feeding frenzy – it’s acquire or be acquired,” said Erickson.

Commodities

Oil prices flat as investors await US inventory data

letizo News

Published

on

LONDON (Reuters) -Oil prices were broadly flat on Thursday as investors waited on developments in the Middle East, the release of official U.S. oil inventory data and details on China’s stimulus plans.

futures were up 25 cents to $74.47 a barrel at 0834 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were at $70.64 a barrel, also up 25 cents.

Both benchmarks settled down on Wednesday, closing at their lowest levels since Oct. 2 for a second day in a row, after OPEC and the International Energy Agency cut demand forecasts for 2024 and 2025.

Prices have also fallen as fears eased that a retaliatory attack by Israel on Iran for the latter’s Oct. 1 missile strike could disrupt oil supplies, though uncertainty remains over how the conflict in the Middle East will develop.

“The country’s forthcoming retaliatory measures against Iran are still not clear,” said John Evans of oil broker PVM.

He added that the Middle East “will certainly provide enough reason to move oil prices again soon enough and investors today will also be preoccupied with an abundance of financial data”.

Among that data are U.S. oil inventories. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) will release its official government data at 11 a.m. EDT (1500 GMT).

The American Petroleum Institute’s Wednesday figures showed crude and fuel stocks fell last week, market sources said, against expectations of a build-up in crude stockpiles. [EIA/S]

“Any signs of weak demand in EIA’s weekly inventory report could put further downward pressure on oil prices,” ANZ analysts said.

PVM’s Evans also cited Thursday’s U.S. jobless claims data at 8.30 a.m. EDT (1230 GMT) and a rate decision from the European Central Bank.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Oil tankers sail along Nakhodka Bay near the port city of Nakhodka, Russia August 12, 2022. REUTERS/Tatiana Meel/File Photo

That decision may support oil prices if the bank goes ahead with lowering interest rates again, the first back-to-back rate cut in 13 years, as it shifts focus from cooling inflation to protecting economic growth.

Investors are also waiting for further details from Beijing on broad plans announced on Oct. 12 to revive its ailing economy, including efforts to shore up its ailing property market.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Is gold a safer investment than bonds? BofA answers

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — Bank of America analysts argued in a note Thursday that gold is emerging as a more attractive safe-haven asset than government bonds, driven by fiscal concerns and global economic dynamics.

While falling real interest rates typically boost gold prices, BofA notes that “higher rates do not necessarily put pressure on gold,” signaling a shift in how the yellow metal reacts to macroeconomic conditions.

One of the key drivers, according to BofA, is growing fiscal pressure. The U.S. national debt is expected to reach unprecedented levels in the next three years, and interest payments on this debt are likely to increase as a share of GDP.

As BofA explains, “This makes gold an attractive asset,” prompting them to reaffirm their bullish target of $3,000 per ounce.

BofA also highlights that both leading U.S. presidential candidates—Kamala Harris and Donald Trump—show little inclination toward fiscal restraint.

In fact, “policymakers strongly favor fiscal expansion” globally, the bank points out.

Future commitments, including climate initiatives, defense spending, and demographic challenges, could raise spending by as much as 7-8% of GDP annually by 2030, said the bank, citing IMF estimates.

If markets struggle to absorb the increasing debt issuance, volatility could rise, further supporting demand for gold. “Central banks in particular could further diversify their currency reserves,” BofA notes, adding that gold holdings by central banks have grown from 3% to 10% of total reserves over the past decade.

Western investors have also stepped back into the gold market in recent months. Although China’s gold imports fell during summer amid stimulus efforts, non-monetary gold demand from Western participants has increased.

However, BofA warns that short-term gains may be limited as markets factor in “a no-landing scenario for the U.S. and a slower pace of rate cuts,” which could cap gold’s near-term upside.

“There is also a risk that gold may give back some of the recent gains, although we ultimately see prices supported at $2,000/oz,” BofA concluded.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Oil prices: Bank of America sees ‘more downside to $70 than upside’

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — Bank of America (BofA) is forecasting more downside risk than upside to oil prices, with likely settling around $70 per barrel.

In a Thursday note, the bank’s commodities team shared a cautious view on oil due to several factors influencing the market, including OPEC’s supply dynamics and non-OPEC production growth.

“Our base case is $70/bbl (which we think is priced in), but we see more downside oil price risk than upside (OPEC spare capacity could easily cover most scenarios of barrels threatened by wider Middle East conflict),” strategists noted.

A key driver of this risk is the potential for OPEC to bring back an additional 2 million barrels per day to the market, on top of expected non-OPEC supply growth of 1.6 million barrels per day. BofA forecasts that global demand for oil is projected to grow by only 1 million barrels per day next year.

“Our call on OPEC is a very slow return of the ~2mbd – and this suggests ~6-7% of demand as OPEC spare capacity, according to energy data firm Woodmac,” the note continues.

“This ceded share has been higher in the past, but generally only in short, surprise demand downturns, not as a norm. To us, this suggests limited upside to our $70 Brent price and potential downside should OPEC regain share.”

In the current environment, BofA strategists said they prefer gas-linked stocks, particularly midstream companies. They note that while there is currently an oversupply of gas, the medium-term prospects are improving, with positive catalysts expected in 2025 as data center growth and liquefied (LNG) demand start to accelerate.

The team believes the market is underestimating the free cash flow (FCF) potential of their preferred companies, some of which could see payouts increase by 50% by 2027.

Cheniere Energy (NYSE:) remains BofA’s top Buy-rated pick, with the bank predicting FCF inflection towards more than $20 per share in the next three years.

Other Buy-rated energy names include Kinder Morgan (NYSE:), Williams Companies (NYSE:), and Chevron (NYSE:), among others.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved