Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

Besides ME tensions, Libya’s crisis could cause oil prices to overshoot

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, recent geopolitical developments have increased attention to oil markets, with Libya’s escalating situation receiving particular attention. 

The ongoing tensions between Israel and Hezbollah in the Middle East have raised global concerns, but the deepening political crisis in Libya is a more immediate threat to global oil prices. 

Analysts at Citi Research warn that the potential disruption of up to 900,000 barrels per day (b/d) of light, sweet from Libya could push prices into the mid-$80s per barrel, further complicating an already precarious global energy landscape.

Libya, a key player in the global oil market, is once again on the brink of a significant crisis. The country’s political instability, driven by a power struggle between its divided elites, is threatening to disrupt its oil production and exports. 

The ongoing dispute centers around the control of the Central Bank of Libya and the management of oil revenues, with factions vying for dominance over the country’s most crucial economic asset.

Citi Research flags that the worsening political situation in Libya could lead to the disruption of up to 900,000 b/d of light, sweet crude oil flows. 

Such a disruption would significantly impact global oil markets, especially given that Libyan crude is highly valued for its low sulfur content. The potential supply shortfall could trigger a surge in Brent crude prices, with analysts forecasting a possible overshoot into the mid-$80s per barrel range.

The geopolitical risks in Libya are intensifying due to a combination of factors that could further exacerbate the situation. A key issue is the disruption at the El Sharara oil field, one of Libya’s largest, which has been severely impacted by political tensions. 

This disruption was initiated by Saddam Haftar, the son of Eastern Libya’s military leader General Khalifa Haftar, who ordered the field’s closure in response to an international arrest warrant against him. 

Although production at El Sharara has partially resumed to meet domestic demand, it remains significantly below capacity, operating at just 80,000 barrels per day (b/d) out of a potential 300,000 b/d. This reduction in supply is already tightening the global market for light, sweet crude, and any further disruptions could have serious repercussions.

Adding to these challenges is the upcoming refinery maintenance season, which, coupled with potential additional supply from OPEC+, could temporarily ease some pressure on crude oil prices. 

However, this might not be enough to counterbalance the effects of a prolonged Libyan supply disruption.

“The sudden closure of El Sharara oil field could potentially prompt OPEC+ to proceed with their planned tapering over 4Q’24, amounting to around 200-k b/d of mostly sour barrels, which even if fully offset by El Sharara closure would still imbalance the global crude oil quality spectrum,” the analysts said. 

The impact of the Libyan crisis is also expected to affect the price differentials between sweet and sour crude. The closure of Libyan oil fields, particularly El Sharara, has already begun to squeeze the supply of light, sweet crude. 

Citi Research predicts that even if there isn’t a full blockade of Libya’s oil export flows, the price differentials between sweet and sour crude could widen, with the Brent-Dubai Exchange of Futures for Swaps (EFS) potentially increasing from the current $1.85 per barrel.

Further complicating the global oil market dynamics is Kazakhstan’s potential adoption of a new compensation plan, which could reduce its CPC Blend exports by over 200,000 b/d in October 2024. This reduction would primarily affect competition with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) flows, adding another layer of complexity to an already strained market.

The potential disruption in Libya comes at a critical time for global oil markets, which are already grappling with volatility due to broader geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. The situation between Israel and Hezbollah, while currently contained, could escalate, leading to further instability in the region. 

Citi Research analysts suggest that any significant escalation could result in a wider blockade of oil export flows, particularly in Libya, which could push oil prices even higher.

Moreover, the political situation in Libya is precarious, with the possibility of further deterioration into armed conflict if international efforts to mediate the crisis fail. 

Such a scenario would likely result in a prolonged disruption of Libyan oil exports, exacerbating the supply-demand imbalance in the global oil market and potentially leading to sustained higher prices.

Commodities

Natural gas prices outlook for 2025

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — The outlook for prices in 2025 remains cautiously optimistic, influenced by a mix of global demand trends, supply-side constraints, and weather-driven uncertainties. 

As per analysts at BofA Securities, U.S. Henry Hub prices are expected to average $3.33/MMBtu for the year, marking a rebound from the low levels seen throughout much of 2024.

Natural gas prices in 2024 were characterized by subdued trading, largely oscillating between $2 and $3/MMBtu, making it the weakest year since the pandemic-induced slump in 2020. 

This price environment persisted despite record domestic demand, which averaged over 78 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), buoyed by increases in power generation needs and continued industrial activity. 

However, warm weather conditions during the 2023–24 winter suppressed residential and commercial heating demand, contributing to the overall price weakness.

Looking ahead, several factors are poised to tighten the natural gas market and elevate prices in 2025. 

A key driver is the anticipated rise in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports as new facilities, including the Plaquemines and Corpus Christi Stage 3 projects, come online. 

These additions are expected to significantly boost U.S. feedgas demand, adding strain to domestic supply and lifting prices. 

The ongoing growth in exports to Mexico via pipeline, which hit record levels in 2024, further underscores the international pull on U.S. gas.

On the domestic front, production constraints could play a pivotal role in shaping the price trajectory. 

While U.S. dry gas production remains historically robust, averaging around 101 Bcf/d in 2024, capital discipline among exploration and production companies suggests a limited ability to rapidly scale output in response to higher prices. 

Producers have strategically withheld volumes, awaiting a more favorable pricing environment. If supply fails to match the anticipated uptick in demand, analysts warn of potential upward repricing in the market.

Weather patterns remain a wildcard. Forecasts suggest that the 2024–25 winter could be 2°F colder than the previous year, potentially driving an additional 500 Bcf of seasonal demand. 

However, should warmer-than-expected temperatures materialize, the opposite effect could dampen price gains. Historically, colder winters have correlated with significant price spikes, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to heating demand.

The structural shift in the U.S. power generation mix also supports a bullish case for natural gas. Ongoing retirements of coal-fired power plants, coupled with the rise of renewable energy, have entrenched natural gas as a critical bridge fuel. 

Even as wind and solar capacity expand, natural gas is expected to fill gaps in generation during periods of low renewable output, further solidifying its role in the energy transition.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Trump picks Brooke Rollins to be agriculture secretary

letizo News

Published

on

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Brooke Rollins (NYSE:), president of the America First Policy Institute, to be agriculture secretary.

“As our next Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke will spearhead the effort to protect American Farmers, who are truly the backbone of our Country,” Trump said in a statement.

If confirmed by the Senate, Rollins would lead a 100,000-person agency with offices in every county in the country, whose remit includes farm and nutrition programs, forestry, home and farm lending, food safety, rural development, agricultural research, trade and more. It had a budget of $437.2 billion in 2024.

The nominee’s agenda would carry implications for American diets and wallets, both urban and rural. Department of Agriculture officials and staff negotiate trade deals, guide dietary recommendations, inspect meat, fight wildfires and support rural broadband, among other activities.

“Brooke’s commitment to support the American Farmer, defense of American Food Self-Sufficiency, and the restoration of Agriculture-dependent American Small Towns is second to none,” Trump said in the statement.

The America First Policy Institute is a right-leaning think tank whose personnel have worked closely with Trump’s campaign to help shape policy for his incoming administration. She chaired the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.

As agriculture secretary, Rollins would advise the administration on how and whether to implement clean fuel tax credits for biofuels at a time when the sector is hoping to grow through the production of sustainable aviation fuel.

The nominee would also guide next year’s renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal, in the shadow of disputes over Mexico’s attempt to bar imports of genetically modified corn and Canada’s dairy import quotas.

© Reuters. Brooke Rollins, President and CEO of the America First Policy Institute speaks during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden, in New York, U.S., October 27, 2024. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Trump has said he again plans to institute sweeping tariffs that are likely to affect the farm sector.

He was considering offering the role to former U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler, a staunch ally whom he chose to co-chair his inaugural committee, CNN reported on Friday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Citi simulates an increase of global oil prices to $120/bbl. Here’s what happens

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.cm — Citi Research has simulated the effects of a hypothetical oil price surge to $120 per barrel, a scenario reflecting potential geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East. 

As per Citi, such a price hike would result in a major but temporary economic disruption, with global output losses peaking at around 0.4% relative to the baseline forecast. 

While the impact diminishes over time as oil prices gradually normalize, the economic ripples are uneven across regions, flagging varying levels of resilience and policy responses.

The simulated price increase triggers a contraction in global economic output, primarily driven by higher energy costs reducing disposable incomes and corporate profit margins. 

The global output loss, though substantial at the onset, is projected to stabilize between 0.3% and 0.4% before fading as oil prices return to baseline forecasts.

The United States shows a more muted immediate output loss compared to the Euro Area or China. 

This disparity is partly attributed to the U.S.’s status as a leading oil producer, which cushions the domestic economy through wealth effects, such as stock market boosts from energy sector gains. 

However, the U.S. advantage is short-lived; tighter monetary policies to counteract inflation lead to delayed negative impacts on output.

Headline inflation globally is expected to spike by approximately two percentage points, with the U.S. experiencing a slightly more pronounced increase. 

The relatively lower taxation of energy products in the U.S. amplifies the pass-through of oil price shocks to consumers compared to Europe, where higher energy taxes buffer the direct impact.

Central bank responses diverge across regions. In the U.S., where inflation impacts are more acute, the Federal Reserve’s reaction function—based on the Taylor rule—leads to an initial tightening of monetary policy. This contrasts with more subdued policy changes in the Euro Area and China, where central banks are less aggressive in responding to the transient inflation spike.

Citi’s analysts frame this scenario within the context of ongoing geopolitical volatility, particularly in the Middle East. The model assumes a supply disruption of 2-3 million barrels per day over several months, underscoring the precariousness of energy markets to geopolitical shocks.

The report flags several broader implications. For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing short-term inflation control with the need to cushion economic output. 

For businesses and consumers, a price hike of this magnitude underscores the importance of energy cost management and diversification strategies. 

Finally, the analysts  cautions that the simulation’s results may understate risks if structural changes, such as the U.S.’s evolving role as an energy exporter, are not fully captured in the model.

While the simulation reflects a temporary shock, its findings reinforce the need for resilience in energy policies and monetary frameworks. Whether or not such a scenario materializes, Citi’s analysis provides a window into the complex interplay of economics, energy, and geopolitics in shaping global economic outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved