Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

Analysis-Promise of calmer markets as US oil wrests pricing power from Brent

letizo News

Published

on

Analysis-Promise of calmer markets as US oil wrests pricing power from Brent
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Crude oil storage tanks are seen from above at the Cushing oil hub, appearing to run out of space to contain a historic supply glut that has hammered prices, in Cushing, Oklahoma, March 24, 2016. REUTERS/Nick Oxford//File Photo

By Alex Lawler

LONDON (Reuters) – Increased exports of oil from the United States into Europe and Asia mean has snatched back its primacy in setting international pricing after North Sea (NYSE:) grades have for decades determined the value of the world’s most traded commodity.

The trend has calmed volatility and limits the potential for trading plays, known by traders as squeezes, that have on occasions distorted the established Brent oil benchmark, based on North Sea crudes, traders and industry insiders said.

A lack of volatility and of price distortion would be positive for consumers, stung by months of high inflation driven by energy prices. Some analysts also say the change has shifted power to U.S. companies and traders in the U.S. market.

Historically, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were the first widely accessible crude contracts launched on financial markets in 1983 until the Brent futures contract, launched in 1988, eventually gained prominence.

Its rise has been checked by declining volumes from ageing North Sea fields, while U.S. production has continued to rise as a result of the shale revolution that meant oil previously too difficult to extract could be released.

As a result, oil-index publisher S&P Global Commodity Insights, widely known as Platts, added the U.S. crude grade WTI Midland to the dated Brent benchmark from June deliveries and it often plays a role in setting its value.

“The introduction of WTI Midland into the North Sea basket has fast-tracked Midland from being a domestic crude…and rendered the U.S. grade the most important in the world, well currently anyway,” John Evans of oil broker PVM said.

Dated Brent is a part of the wider Brent complex that includes physical cargoes, swaps and the Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE:) Brent futures contract. Brent is used to price over three-quarters of the world’s traded oil.

Adi Imsirovic, director at consultant Surrey Clean Energy and a veteran oil trader who has written extensively on Brent, said the amalgamation of the two international benchmarks was positive.

“Brent is working just fine,” he said. “You’ve got the two major benchmarks in the world working in synch.”

CHANGED DYNAMICS

The extra supply underpinning the benchmark has reduced volatility in the spreads between monthly futures contracts, which previously have been distorted as traders sought profits, especially when a monthly contract expired.

Oil traders, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorised to speak to the press, say the much larger WTI volumes available prevent price manipulation.

A senior executive at a major oil trader said the dynamic of Brent trading had changed “dramatically”.

Data from Kpler said the volume of WTI Midland flowing to Europe reached about 1.34 million barrels per day in July, before easing in August, far more than the typical output of the five North Sea crudes used in the benchmark.

The price of dated Brent is set by the cheapest of the six crudes. An S&P Global chart provided to Reuters shows Midland having a leading role in setting the value.

At the same time, volatility in the spread between the first- and second-month Brent crude futures contracts has decreased.

Previously, many of the companies that trade the crude, from trading houses such as Glencore (OTC:) and Vitol to refiners such as Shell (LON:), regularly built big positions that could lead to unusual patterns in related physical and derivative markets.

Although the practice did not breach any regulations, disputes have arisen, including a lawsuit, settled out of court, in which oil refiner Tosco alleged trading company Arcadia had gained a monopoly position in 2000.

Asked to comment on whether the potential for trading plays had decreased, Platts said one aim of adding more oil to any benchmark was to prevent “anomalous” price rises.

“We feel that Midland’s inclusion has been able to do that,” Joel Hanley, global director, crude and fuel oil, at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said.

POWER SHIFT?

Adding WTI to Brent has also redistributed market power, some analysts say.

Companies have firewalls in place to prevent oil traders receiving price-sensitive information.

However, traders have said that when Brent was based just on North Sea crude, companies that owned stakes in producing North Sea fields or in infrastructure, were better placed to have insight into developments that could move the market, such as outages or refinery maintenance.

“Now, the marginal powerful player is a U.S. supplier who has the knowledge of production/scheduling and shipping/port issues,” said Jorge Montepeque, who during decades working at Platts developed dated Brent.

“The power shifted and this is clearly seen when American companies who were not trading the North Sea in size suddenly rushed in.”

U.S. players, such as Occidential and Phillips 66 (NYSE:) have begun offering or bidding for WTI Midland cargoes that could set the dated Brent price, trade sources said.

Other U.S. oil companies ConocoPhillips (NYSE:) and Chevron (NYSE:) might become involved, two industry sources said. Conoco and Chevron declined to comment.

Platts said it has not seen a significant rise in U.S. companies entering the market.

LESS TRANSPARENT?

Every month, producers issue a list of the North Sea cargoes for export. There is no Midland programme because, traders say, no single company – or operator – is in charge, and several terminals supply cargoes.

Some traders say this has made the market less transparent. “We will get our cargo loading dates, but we won’t see all the loading dates at the terminal,” said a trading source.

An industry source said efforts were being made to address this by creating a loading programme for WTI.

Hanley of Platts, which told Reuters in April it did not see any problems around the lack of a programme, said adding WTI Midland into the Brent complex had already added transparency.

Imsirovic, the veteran trader, said historically some market players had always held advantages over others, but he predicted the benefits of the change would become more apparent.

“We have new players in the Brent market which is surely a good thing and we’ve widened the base of people involved,” he said. “That’s going to get even wider I think, over time.”

Thomson Reuters (NYSE:) competes with Platts in providing news and data about the oil market.

Commodities

Oil prices settle lower after weak August jobs report adds to demand concerns

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — Oil prices settled lower Friday, ending the week with a loss as weaker U.S. nonfarm payrolls stoked concerns about an economic-led slowdown in crude demand. 

At 2:30 p.m. ET (1430 GMT), the futures (WTI) traded fell 2.1% to settle at $67.67 a barrel, while contract fell 2.2% to $71.06 per barrel.

U.S. economic slowdown worries resurface after weak jobs report

The US economy added fewer jobs than anticipated in August, but rose from a sharply revised July figure, according to Labor Department data that could factor into the Federal Reserve’s next policy decisions.

Nonfarm payrolls came in at 142,000 last month, up from a downwardly-revised mark of 89,000 in July. Economists had called for a reading of 164,000, up from the initial July mark of 114,000.

Following the release, bets that the Fed will introduce a deeper 50 basis-point rate cut — rather than a shallower 25 basis-point reduction — increased.

Concerns about the demand come just a day after OPEC+ said it had agreed to postpone a planned increase in oil production for October and November.

U.S., Europe working on Iran sanctions 

Geopolitical tensions ratcheted up on Friday after the U.S. and Europe they were working on sanctions to impose on Iran after the Tehran sent missiles to Russia. 

The U.S. had previously warned Iran about transferring missiles to Russia, saying it would represent a major escalation in Iran’s support of Russia’s war against Ukraine. 

Continue Reading

Commodities

Goldman Sachs expects OPEC+ production increases to start in December

letizo News

Published

on

(Reuters) – Goldman Sachs adjusted its expectations for OPEC+ oil production saying it now expects three months of production increases starting from December instead of October, the bank said in a note on Friday.

OPEC+ has agreed to delay a planned oil output increase for October and November, the producers group said on Thursday after crude prices hit their lowest in nine months, adding it could further pause or reverse the hikes if needed.

However Goldman Sachs maintained its range of $70-85 per barrel and a December 2025 Brent forecast at $74 per barrel.

The investment bank expects the effects of a modest reduction in OPEC+ supply in the upcoming months to be counterbalanced by easing effects from the current softness in China’s demand and faster-than-expected recovery of Libya’s supply.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view of the logo of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) outside their headquarters in Vienna, Austria, November 30, 2023. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger/File Photo

“We still see the risks to our $70-85 range as skewed to the downside given high spare capacity, and downside risks to demand from weakness in China and potential trade tensions,” Goldman Sachs said.

Brent crude futures were down $1.63, or 2.24%, to $71.06 a barrel on Friday, their lowest level since December 2021. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures fell $1.48 on Friday, or 2.14%, to $67.67, their lowest since June 2023. [O/R]

Continue Reading

Commodities

Citi, Bank of America see oil prices potentially going to $60

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — Strategists at Citi Research said oil prices could decline to around $60 per barrel by 2025, citing a significant market surplus as the primary driver.

While recent supply disruptions in Libya and a delayed production cut unwinding by OPEC+ have offered short-term support for Brent prices in the $70-72 range, Citi views this as temporary.

“At the time of writing, markets have not reacted to the OPEC+ decision, with Brent around flat to the 4 September close. Still, the Libyan situation could take months rather than a week to resolve, strategists wrote.

They highlight the likelihood of a strong market surplus emerging next year, pushing prices lower.

“We recommend selling on a bounce toward ~$80 Brent, as we look ahead to moves down to the $60 range in 2025 as a sizeable market surplus emerges,” the note states.

OPEC+ has delayed the start of its planned production cut unwind from October 2024 to December 2024, with the process now set to conclude by the end of 2025. This decision comes in response to recent market weakness and price declines, despite ongoing disruptions to Libyan oil supplies and broader economic concerns in the U.S. and China.

Separately, Bank of America’s Commodities Research team has revised down its price forecast to $75 per barrel for the second half of 2024, down from nearly $90, and for 2025, reduced from $80.

The team cites concerns about growing global oil inventories despite assuming OPEC+ will delay planned production increases. They note that weaker demand growth, combined with record OPEC+ spare capacity exceeding 5 million barrels per day, has dimmed the outlook for oil prices.

“In effect, we now see Brent oil prices moving from the top toward the middle of our unchanged $60-80/bbl medium-term range faster than previously warned,” BofA strategists said. This surplus in capacity, along with slower demand, also reduces the risk of price spikes from potential geopolitical disruptions.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved