Commodities
Energy & precious metals – weekly review and outlook
![](https://letizo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/energy-precious-metals-weekly-review-andoutlook_64fdc36b1d2c4.jpeg)
![Energy & precious metals - weekly review and outlook](https://i-invdn-com.investing.com/news/LYNXMPEABT05G_L.jpg)
© Reuters.
Investing.com — The news came as quietly as it could on a Friday afternoon and passed without any discernible impact. And understandably too: The U.S. went up by one last week, after a drop of 127 over the past year.
But there was a significance to the story. It was the first time since June that U.S. energy firms increased the number of rigs actively drilling for oil in the country, according to a weekly update of the rig count by oil services firm Baker Hughes.
One oil rig, of course, means nothing — particularly if the count drops back the following week, and by a far greater amount.
But it could mean something if there’s a steady climb hereon.
If not anything else, a steady, albeit slow, climb will challenge the argument made day in and out by those convinced that this year’s near-20% slump in rigs will soon cause a tumble in U.S. crude production.
That argument has grown despite the U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, adjusting upward its estimate on crude production to three-year highs of 12.8 million barrels per day in recent weeks, from 12.2 million at the end of July.
The EIA’s revisions came after it raised its production for U.S. crude under a new reporting methodology that took into account crude flowing from active oil wells compared with those that are drilled but uncompleted — the latter referred to as DUCs.
The revisions imply that active drilling rigs were about 10% more productive in 2021–2022 than previously estimated. Such drilling-rig productivity or efficiency would offset to some extent this year’s sheer drop in the rig count.
The EIA’s new methodology is, however, vehemently opposed by those who are long-oil, or wagering for crude prices to rise.
“The reality is that the trajectory of future US oil production would beak and the supply side would start to drain and that is happening,” said Phil Flynn, an energy analyst at Chicago’s Price Futures Group, whose many followers are made up of those who are long oil.
The rig count remains one of the crucial indicators of oil production. But even so, it’s a lagging indicator that could take months to show up in actual production. This may be why the EIA’s crude production estimates haven’t ticked down yet as the falling rig count hasn’t made a commensurate impact on U.S. crude.
But then again, we have to consider the EIA’s explanation about the higher drilling efficiency for the remaining active wells, a phenomenon that could well challenge any argument about falling rigs.
There are many who contend that the EIA is going about the whole thing wrongly, and for devious reasons too, they say. Their theory is based on the conspiracy of an entire U.S. energy department working in cahoots with the White House to cook up numbers on drilling efficiency. The accusation does not seem to take into account career professionals at the department who’ve dedicated their lives working for the betterment of the energy sector and the data integrity that’s sacrosanct to their work.
But there are also economists like Adam Button, who while bullish on oil, are pragmatic about the lift current crude prices can provide to production.
“It’s tough to see how U.S. oil production is higher at the end of next year if this doesn’t turn around quickly,” Button said, referring to the oil rig count, in a blog on the ForexLive platform on Friday.
He, however, added: “There is plenty of talk about discipline among U.S. oil producers but $87 oil has a way of eroding that.”
The last line was in reference to the pre-weekend settlement for U.S. crude, which in March stood at a low of beneath $65.
Oil: Market Settlements and Activity
Oil prices rose for a second week in a row on Friday as traders hedged against supply insecurities, ramped up by concerns that Saudi Arabia and Russia will be removing a combined 1.3 million barrels per day from the market till the year-end.
Both New York-traded WTI, or West Texas Intermediate, crude and its London-based peer, Brent, reversed Thursday’s drop of close to 1% as the weekend approached.
did a final trade of $87.23 on Friday after officially settling the session at $87.51 per barrel, up 64 cents, or 0.7%, on the day. The U.S. crude benchmark hit a 10-month peak of $88.09 on Wednesday. With a net gain in three days versus two, WTI rose 2.2% on the week, extending the prior week’s 7.2% rally.
did a final trade of $90.44 on Friday after officially settling the session at $90.65, up 73 cents, or 0.8%, on the day, recapturing the $90 handle which it momentarily lost for the first time on Thursday after gaining it on Tuesday. For the week, the global oil benchmark rose 2.4%, extending the prior week’s 4.8% gain.
Brent’s rise to above $90 came with less than three weeks left of summer, the season Americans like driving the most. With the fall season of lower oil usage set to begin on Sept. 23, crude prices would typically retreat a little, sometimes meaningfully, in the world’s largest consuming country.
But that may not happen this time, not with Saudi Arabia’s target of ultimately getting oil to $100 a barrel or beyond. The Saudis, who control much of the world’s oil exports, have been trying to bring oil back to triple-digit pricing since losing that advantage in August 2022, when Brent crude hovered above $105 a barrel.
Key to this is the 1 million barrels per day in additional cuts, on top of other existing production rationing, that the Saudis have been carrying out since July. By extending this till the year-end — and widening it with the help of Moscow which will cut 300,000 barrels per day of Russian production — the kingdom is hoping to create a different sort of market phenomenon for pricing.
Fear of less oil for the market to play with was playing on traders’ minds, particularly with the approach of the weekend which tends to put the market on a hedging overdrive, said analysts.
“Oil prices have consolidated a little as we’ve moved through the week but the trend remains very positive for crude, backed once again by the decision from Saudi Arabia and Russia to extend supply restrictions to the end of the year,” observed Craig Erlam, analyst at online trading platform OANDA.
“A lot more oil [is] off the market at a time when it’s clearly quite tight, albeit with a global economic outlook that is highly uncertain. Demand may still wane but traders appear to be working on the assumption of soft landings and mild recessions at worst. China is another unknown with slow and steady growth, by its standards, looking like the path ahead.”
Data on Thursday showed overall Chinese exports and imports fell in August, as sagging overseas demand and weak consumer spending squeezed businesses.
However, even in times of lackluster economic activity, China tends to bolster its storage capacity, particularly with the availability of cheap Russian crude. Last month, Chinese crude imports rose nearly 31%.
Meanwhile, questions remain about whether central banks in the United States and Europe will continue their aggressive interest rate hike campaigns to tame persistent inflation.
The Saudis are “acutely aware of the tightrope” which they walk between tight supplies and the limited progress in fighting achieved by central banks, said John Evans at oil broker PVM.
Oil: WTI Technical Outlook
WTI’s close of above the 100-week SMA, or Simple Moving Average, statically aligns with the $85.90 support, adding more fuel to its bullish bias, said Sunil Kumar Dixit, technical strategist at SKCharting.com.
As long as the momentum in the U.S. crude benchmark maintains stability at above the 5-day EMA, or Exponential Moving Average dynamically positioned at $86.60, “oil bears will have to remain in the waiting lounge”, Dixit remarked.
He, however, cautions that the ride up will probably be smaller after this.
“It should be noted that the aforementioned 5-day EMA is the first line of defense for the longs,” Dixit said. “There is limited room for immediate upward advance towards the initial resistance of $88.50 and $89.50, before WTI’s embarkation towards major overhead resistance at $96.”
Weakness in chasing the heights can be witnessed if $89.50 proves to be a resistance as well, which may gain affirmation with a close below the 5-day EMA, said Dixit.
“Such downward consolidation below the 5-Day EMA will aim for a drop towards the horizontal support of $84.90 – $84.40,” he said. “If this support area fails, we can expect a drop to $83.70 and $82.80.”
Gold: Market Settlements and Activity
The prospect of gold breaking out solely on a Fed pause in rates was challenged again this week as the yellow metal posted a weekly loss as its nemesis, the , shot up instead.
In Friday’s trade, gold futures’ most-active did a final trade of $1,942.60 an ounce, after officially settling the session at $1,942.70, up 20 cents on the day. Yet, losses in three prior sessions after Monday’s U.S. Labor Day holiday meant a negative week for gold futures, which finished the five-day period down by a net 1.2%, practically giving back the previous week’s 1.3% gain.
The , which is more closely followed than futures by some traders, settled at $1,919.15, down 57 cents, or 0.03%. For the week, the spot price, which is reflective of real-time trades in bullion, was down 1.1% versus the prior week’s 1.3% gain.
The previous week’s gain came on the back of the U.S. report for August, which saw unemployment tick up to 3.8% from July’s 3.5% despite a gain of 187,000 jobs versus the forecast 170,000. The higher jobless rate reinforced the notion that the Fed will hold rates unchanged when it meets on Sept. 20 to review U.S. monetary policy, sending gold momentarily higher last week.
But as this week began, speculation resurfaced of the Fed exercising another rate hike or more before the end of the year, in its bid to bring inflation to its annual target of 2%.
Inflation, measured by the , or CPI, fell from a four-decade high of more than 9% per annum in June 2022 to as low as 3% in June this year. But as of July, it began to perk again, reaching 3.2%. That raised the possibility of the Fed, which has already added 5% to interest rates over the past 18 months, to turn aggressive again on monetary policy. That sent the Dollar Index to six-month highs.
Since the latest non-farm payrolls surfaced a week ago, the spot price of gold has moved just about $15 an ounce, going from a settlement of just below $1,940 on Sept. 1 to trade in a range of between $1,920 and $1,925 in the latest session.
Gold chartist Sunil Kumar Dixit said the same $15 play is what the spot price needs to crack in order for a new price direction to emerge.
Paramount to the bears in gold now is a push of the spot price beneath the key $1,1915 support, said Dixit.
For the longs, it’s a clear break above the $1,930 resistance, he said.
“Gold has had another interesting week, with last Friday’s jobs report feeling like a distant memory,” said Ed Moya, analyst at online trading platform OANDA. “It didn’t give it anything like the boost that it appeared it would on the basis of the numbers themselves, almost all of which looked very favorable.”
Moya noted that gold’s slide this week also came on the back of U.S. economic data suggesting that a soft landing, rather than a hard recession, could be the scenario for the world’s largest economy by the end of the year.
“Perhaps the yellow metal has found steady ground in the $1,900-$1,950 region as we await next week’s inflation data and the Fed meeting the following week,” he said, referring to the upcoming August update of the CPI and the of the central bank.
Gold: Spot Price Outlook
Spot gold’s bounce back from the $1,915 confluence support zone, marked by the Daily Middle Bollinger and the 200-day SMA, met with resistance at the 50-day EMA of $1,930, resulting in a drop to $1,917, SKCharting’s Dixit noted.
“The bulls have however a ray of hope with settlement above the mentioned inflection point for resuming an upward advance to retest $1,930,” said Dixit. “Clearing through this zone will put spot gold back on the bullish path for $1,940-$1,948.”
Strong acceptance above $1,948 will also favor the next leg higher at $1,971-$1,975, he said.
“If this support cluster fails to hold, we are likely to see gold dropping to $1,910, followed by the 50-week EMA of $1,899. A break below $1,899 opens the way for deeper losses.”
Major downside support was seen at the monthly Middle Bollinger Band of $1,858, he added.
Natural gas: Market Settlements and Activity
The front-month on the New York Mercantile Exchange’s Henry Hub did a final trade of $2.618 per mmBtu, or million metric British thermal units on Friday after officially settling the session at $2.605, up 2.6 cents or 1%.
For the week though, October gas fell 16 cents, or 5.8%.
Natural gas: Technical Outlook
Natural Gas continues to coil within a narrowing range of the 100-day SMA of $2.51 which acts as horizontal support and the $2.70 level, which serves as resistance, said SKCharting’s Dixit.
“The market appears to be waiting for a break above the descending 200-day SMA of $2.90,” Dixit said. “Above $2.90 and $3.00, the next resistance levels would be $3.17 and $3.24.”
But a break below $2.50 will turn the short-term trend in gas back towards bearish, with a downside potential retest at $2.25 and $2.00, he said.
Disclaimer: Barani Krishnan does not hold positions in the commodities and securities he writes about.
Commodities
Oil prices settle lower after weak August jobs report adds to demand concerns
![](https://letizo.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/oil-prices-settle-lower-after-weak-august-jobs-report-addsto-demand-concerns_66dc53fb8f210.jpeg)
Investing.com — Oil prices settled lower Friday, ending the week with a loss as weaker U.S. nonfarm payrolls stoked concerns about an economic-led slowdown in crude demand.
At 2:30 p.m. ET (1430 GMT), the futures (WTI) traded fell 2.1% to settle at $67.67 a barrel, while contract fell 2.2% to $71.06 per barrel.
U.S. economic slowdown worries resurface after weak jobs report
The US economy added fewer jobs than anticipated in August, but rose from a sharply revised July figure, according to Labor Department data that could factor into the Federal Reserve’s next policy decisions.
Nonfarm payrolls came in at 142,000 last month, up from a downwardly-revised mark of 89,000 in July. Economists had called for a reading of 164,000, up from the initial July mark of 114,000.
Following the release, bets that the Fed will introduce a deeper 50 basis-point rate cut — rather than a shallower 25 basis-point reduction — increased.
Concerns about the demand come just a day after OPEC+ said it had agreed to postpone a planned increase in oil production for October and November.
U.S., Europe working on Iran sanctions
Geopolitical tensions ratcheted up on Friday after the U.S. and Europe they were working on sanctions to impose on Iran after the Tehran sent missiles to Russia.
The U.S. had previously warned Iran about transferring missiles to Russia, saying it would represent a major escalation in Iran’s support of Russia’s war against Ukraine.
Commodities
Goldman Sachs expects OPEC+ production increases to start in December
![](https://letizo.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/goldman-sachs-expects-opec-production-increases-to-start-indecember_66dc53f61803f.jpeg)
(Reuters) – Goldman Sachs adjusted its expectations for OPEC+ oil production saying it now expects three months of production increases starting from December instead of October, the bank said in a note on Friday.
OPEC+ has agreed to delay a planned oil output increase for October and November, the producers group said on Thursday after crude prices hit their lowest in nine months, adding it could further pause or reverse the hikes if needed.
However Goldman Sachs maintained its range of $70-85 per barrel and a December 2025 Brent forecast at $74 per barrel.
The investment bank expects the effects of a modest reduction in OPEC+ supply in the upcoming months to be counterbalanced by easing effects from the current softness in China’s demand and faster-than-expected recovery of Libya’s supply.
“We still see the risks to our $70-85 range as skewed to the downside given high spare capacity, and downside risks to demand from weakness in China and potential trade tensions,” Goldman Sachs said.
Brent crude futures were down $1.63, or 2.24%, to $71.06 a barrel on Friday, their lowest level since December 2021. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures fell $1.48 on Friday, or 2.14%, to $67.67, their lowest since June 2023. [O/R]
Commodities
Citi, Bank of America see oil prices potentially going to $60
![](https://letizo.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/citi-bank-of-america-see-oil-prices-potentially-going-to60_66db0275685ed.jpeg)
Investing.com — Strategists at Citi Research said oil prices could decline to around $60 per barrel by 2025, citing a significant market surplus as the primary driver.
While recent supply disruptions in Libya and a delayed production cut unwinding by OPEC+ have offered short-term support for Brent prices in the $70-72 range, Citi views this as temporary.
“At the time of writing, markets have not reacted to the OPEC+ decision, with Brent around flat to the 4 September close. Still, the Libyan situation could take months rather than a week to resolve, strategists wrote.
They highlight the likelihood of a strong market surplus emerging next year, pushing prices lower.
“We recommend selling on a bounce toward ~$80 Brent, as we look ahead to moves down to the $60 range in 2025 as a sizeable market surplus emerges,” the note states.
OPEC+ has delayed the start of its planned production cut unwind from October 2024 to December 2024, with the process now set to conclude by the end of 2025. This decision comes in response to recent market weakness and price declines, despite ongoing disruptions to Libyan oil supplies and broader economic concerns in the U.S. and China.
Separately, Bank of America’s Commodities Research team has revised down its price forecast to $75 per barrel for the second half of 2024, down from nearly $90, and for 2025, reduced from $80.
The team cites concerns about growing global oil inventories despite assuming OPEC+ will delay planned production increases. They note that weaker demand growth, combined with record OPEC+ spare capacity exceeding 5 million barrels per day, has dimmed the outlook for oil prices.
“In effect, we now see Brent oil prices moving from the top toward the middle of our unchanged $60-80/bbl medium-term range faster than previously warned,” BofA strategists said. This surplus in capacity, along with slower demand, also reduces the risk of price spikes from potential geopolitical disruptions.
- Forex2 years ago
Forex Today: the dollar is gaining strength amid gloomy sentiment at the start of the Fed’s week
- Forex2 years ago
How is the Australian dollar doing today?
- Forex2 years ago
Dollar to pound sterling exchange rate today: Pound plummeted to its lowest since 1985
- Forex2 years ago
Unbiased review of Pocket Option broker
- Cryptocurrency2 years ago
What happened in the crypto market – current events today
- World2 years ago
Why are modern video games an art form?
- Stock Markets2 years ago
Morgan Stanley: bear market rally to continue
- Commodities2 years ago
Copper continues to fall in price on expectations of lower demand in China