Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

Environmental activists win landmark ruling over UK oil well plan

letizo News

Published

on

By Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) -Planning authorities should have considered the impact of climate-warming emissions in approving an oil well near Gatwick Airport, the UK’s highest court said on Thursday, a ruling activists say could profoundly impact new fossil fuel projects in Britain.

Environmental campaigners had argued that planning permission to retain and expand the oil well site near London’s Gatwick was flawed because it had not considered the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the oil.

Supreme Court judges agreed by a narrow three to two majority, and quashed the planning approval which they said was unlawful.

While the court said councils could still approve schemes even if they were likely to cause significant harm to the environment, campaigners said the landmark judgment would make it much harder for new oil, gas and coal developments to get approval.

“This historic ruling is a watershed moment in the fight to stop further fossil fuel extraction projects in the UK and make the emissions cuts needed to meet crucial climate targets,” Friends of the Earth lawyer Katie de Kauwe said.

“It is a huge boost to everyone involved in resisting fossil fuel projects.”

The campaign groups said the ruling could hit proposals for other controversial schemes such a new coal mine in Cumbria, northern England, as well as North Sea oil and gas projects.

“Oil and gas companies will be working through the judgment to assess to what extent it affects future projects in the UK, and existing challenges before the courts, which had been stayed pending the Supreme Court’s decision,” Tom Cummins (NYSE:), partner at law firm Ashurst.

The government said it would carefully consider the impact of the ruling and any relevance for other ongoing legal proceedings.

NEW OIL WELLS

The case concerned a decision in 2019 by Surrey County Council to allow Horse Hill Developments, part-owned by British energy company UK Oil & Gas Plc (UKOG), to retain two oil wells and drill four more over a 20-year period near the town of Horley, close to Gatwick.

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the project examined the effect of the construction, production and decommissioning of the site, but did not assess the impact from emissions that would result from the use of the refined oil.

The Weald Action Group (WAG), an umbrella organisation for local groups that campaign against the extraction of oil and gas in southeast England, estimated this would equate to more than 10 million tonnes of carbon emissions.

A campaigner acting for WAG launched a legal challenge against the planning approval on the basis the EIA was flawed, but this was rejected both by the High Court in London and then by the Court of Appeal.

However, the Supreme Court overruled, saying it was inevitable there would be combustion emissions from the refined oil.

“It is not disputed that these emissions, which can easily be quantified, will have a significant impact on climate,” said George Leggatt, one of the three Supreme Court justices who agreed with the appeal.

“The only issue is whether the combustion emissions are effects of the project at all. It seems to me plain that they are.”

© Reuters. A person uses a megaphone as climate activists await a ruling on whether planning permission granted for oil wells in southern England was lawful, outside the Supreme Court in London, Britain, June 20, 2024. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs

UKOG’s CEO Stephen Sanderson said the company’s focus had shifted from oil and gas to underground hydrogen storage, but added it would work closely with the local authority to account for “this retrospective change to EIA requirements”.

The council itself said planning permission for the oil well “remains to be determined in due course”.

Commodities

Oil prices hover near 4-month highs as Russia sanctions stay in focus

letizo News

Published

on

By Arunima Kumar

(Reuters) -Oil prices paused their rally on Tuesday, but remained near four-month highs, with the market’s attention focused on the impact of new U.S. sanctions on Russian oil exports to key buyers India and China.

futures slipped 54 cents, or 0.67%, to $80.47 a barrel by 1033 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell 53 cents, or 0.67% to $78.29 a barrel.

Prices jumped 2% on Monday after the U.S. Treasury Department on Friday imposed sanctions on Gazprom (MCX:) Neft and Surgutneftegas as well as 183 vessels that transport oil as part of Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet” of tankers.

“With several nations seeking alternative fuel supplies in order to adapt to the sanctions, there may be more advances in store, even if prices correct a bit lower should tomorrow’s U.S. CPI data come in somewhat hotter-than-expected”, said Charalampos Pissouros, senior investment analyst at brokerage XM.

The U.S. producer price index (PPI) will be released today, followed by the consumer price index (CPI) on Wednesday.

A core inflation rise above the 0.2% forecast could lower the likelihood of further Federal Reserve rate cuts, which typically support economic growth and could boost oil demand. [MKTS/GLOB]

While analysts were still expecting a significant price impact on Russian oil supplies from the fresh sanctions, their effect on the physical market could be less pronounced than what the affected volumes might suggest.

ING analysts estimated the new sanctions had the potential to erase the entire 700,000 barrel-per-day surplus they had forecast for this year, but said the real impact could be lower.

“The actual reduction in flows will likely be less, as Russia and buyers find ways around these sanctions,” they said in a note.

Nevertheless, analysts expect less of an supply overhang in the market as a result.

© Reuters. A view shows Chao Xing tanker at the crude oil terminal Kozmino on the shore of Nakhodka Bay near the port city of Nakhodka, Russia August 12, 2022. REUTERS/Tatiana Meel/File Photo

“We anticipate that the latest round of sanctions are more likely to move the market closer to balance this year, with less pressure on demand growth to achieve this,” said Panmure Liberum analyst Ashley Kelty.

Uncertainty about demand from major buyer China could blunt the impact of the tighter supply. China’s imports fell in 2024 for the first time in two decades outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, official data showed on Monday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Peru’s niche Bretaña crude oil gains popularity in US

letizo News

Published

on

By Arathy Somasekhar

HOUSTON (Reuters) – Peru’s niche Bretaña is gaining popularity in the United States, with the first cargo discharging in the U.S. Gulf Coast this month as U.S. refiners seek alternatives for declining Mexican heavy crude.

Bretaña, a rare heavy sweet crude with minimal metals, is produced in the Peruvian side of the Amazon (NASDAQ:) rainforest. It is then barged along the Amazon river and loaded onto larger ships that depart from Brazil. 

The vessel Radiant Pride transported about 300,000 barrels of Bretaña from Manaus, on the banks of the Negro river in Brazil, and discharged on Jan. 2 in Houston, ship tracking data from Kpler and LSEG showed.  

The cargo was bought by oil major Shell (LON:), a source said. Shell declined to comment. 

“Given the drop in heavy sour crude from Mexico to the U.S. Gulf Coast over the last year, we are starting to see new heavy grades being pulled in to backfill this loss – this is a trend we only expect to continue,” said Matt Smith, an analyst at Kpler.

U.S. imports from Mexico fell to their lowest on record in 2024 as the Latin American country’s oil production fell and a larger portion of output remained at home to be refined.

Two cargoes of Peru’s Bretaña, a relatively new entrant into the market since production began in 2018, discharged at the U.S. West Coast last year – one at Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:) and another at PBF Energy (NYSE:) terminals, the Kpler data showed.

Marathon Petroleum declined to comment. PBF Energy did not immediately reply to a request for comment. 

PetroTal Corp, the producer of Block 95 where the Bretaña oilfield is located, bought the assets from Canadian producer Gran Tierra Energy (NYSE:) in 2017, and currently produces about 20,000 barrels of oil per day, according to Chief Executive Officer Manuel Zúñiga.

Challenges with transporting the crude via a pipeline operated by Peru’s state oil firm Petroperu led to a brief halt in exports between 2022 and 2024, Zúñiga said. 

Petroperu has struggled in recent years to keep the line operational amid spills and social conflict interrupting its flow. 

Three cargoes of Bretaña headed to the U.S. West Coast and one to the U.S. East Coast between 2020 and 2022, Kpler data showed.

About 90% of the Bretaña crude produced by PetroTal is exported, and the remaining is transported by barges to Petroperu’s refinery in Iquitos, Zúñiga said. 

PetroTal has a contract with Houston-based Novum Energy under which Novum buys the crude for export and arranges its transportation, Zúñiga added.

Novum did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

While PetroTal hopes to increase production, permitting delays as well as reliance on barges are a current limitation, Zúñiga said. 

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Houston Ship Channel, part of the Port of Houston, is seen in Pasadena, Texas, U.S., May 5, 2019.  REUTERS/Loren Elliott/File Photo

“You need access to the pipeline,” Zúñiga said, adding that the company is working to secure use of the infrastructure. 

Petroperu said last year that it would hold negotiations with producers in the Peruvian jungle so that they can use the pipeline with a fair rate to help cover operational costs.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Copper outlook uncertain amid stronger dollar and tariffs- analysts

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — The future of is unclear due to the anticipated strengthening of the dollar, impending tariffs, and a potential slowdown in the energy transition under the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump, according to analysts at BMI, cited by Wall Street Journal.

They point out that even though copper is likely to prosper due to environmental-driven sentiment, the risks associated with their relatively optimistic perspective are leaning towards the negative side.

In a note, the BMI analysts stated, “While we still expect that copper will continue to thrive due to climate-driven sentiment, we note that the balance of risks to our relatively bullish outlook is tilted to the downside.” They do not anticipate a substantial increase in metals demand from the Chinese construction industry.

Nonetheless, they suggest that enhanced industrial activity and growth, driven by government stimulus, could be enough to elevate prices. As of now, the London Metal Exchange (LME) three-month copper is trading 0.6% higher at $9,153 per metric ton.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved