Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

How bad is China oil demand?

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — China, long a driver of global demand, is now seeing one of the sharpest slowdowns in its oil consumption in recent decades. 

“China’s oil demand is growing at the slowest pace in the last 15 years (ex-COVID) with decline of -2% YTD,” said analysts at Bernstein in a note dated Thursday.

This is part of a wider economic slowdown in the country, where the previously thriving industrial and construction sectors have weakened, further contributing to the decline in demand.

Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) report that demand fell by 8% year-on-year  in July, reaching 13.6 million barrels per day (MMbls/d), the lowest figure since 2009 (excluding the COVID period). 

From January to July 2024, China’s average oil demand was 14.3 MMbls/d, down by 0.3 MMbls/d or 2% y-o-y. This represents the first time China has faced a sustained decline in oil demand since 1990 (excluding the COVID downturn).

“China processed crude is down -6% y-o-y at 13.6MMbls/d in July according to China NBS data. China’s Shangdong independent refinery run rates are at 50% in July (63% last year),” the analysts said.

These lower run rates flag the struggling state of China’s refining industry, further reflecting weak demand for refined products domestically.

The drop in domestic fuel sales—an important indicator of consumer-level demand for oil products—is another worrying trend. Reports from major Chinese oil companies, PetroChina and Sinopec (OTC:), show a 2% drop in fuel sales YTD. 

This reflects weakened consumption of diesel, gasoline, and kerosene. In the second quarter of FY24, domestic fuel sales deteriorated further, with a 6% y-o-y decline, indicating continued sluggishness in demand.

The drop is stark in diesel consumption, which is down 4% YTD. Diesel is closely tied to industrial and construction activities, and its decline signals a broader slowdown in the economy. 

On the other hand, gasoline consumption has remained resilient, increasing by 7% YTD, though it is expected to plateau as electric vehicle (EV) adoption accelerates. 

EV penetration has now surpassed 50%, leading analysts to forecast a peak in gasoline demand within the next five years. Kerosene demand, driven by a recovery in air travel, rose by 19% YTD, but other oil products, including naphtha, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and fuel oil, fell by 7% YTD.

Real-time data on seaborne oil imports paints a similarly weak picture. China’s seaborne oil imports in August were down 9% y-o-y to 10.0 MMbls/d. For the year-to-date, seaborne oil imports are down by 2%, which aligns with the declining demand trends observed in domestic sales and refining activity.

“Based on current run rates and company outlook, China’s oil demand could fall by -2 to -4% (0.3-0.6MMbls/d) in 2024 which is below industry expectations,” the analysts said.

Sinopec, the country’s largest refiner, projects that domestic fuel sales will fall by 3.7% y-o-y for the full year, while refining throughput will drop by 1.9%. 

The International Energy Agency (IEA), which initially forecasted oil demand growth of 0.3 MMbls/d (+2% y-o-y), is likely to revise its outlook downward in the coming months.

The fall in oil demand coincides with China’s economy seeing structural challenges, such as a slowing industrial sector, reduced property investment, and softer consumer spending. 

The weaker demand for diesel and other heavy fuels is notable, as it mirrors broader economic trends, while the rise in gasoline demand may slow as electric vehicles continue to capture a larger market share.

Bernstein’s analysis indicates that China’s oil demand is likely to peak within the next five years. Demand for transportation fuels—gasoline and diesel—will likely plateau by 2025 as EV adoption increases, and by 2030, total oil demand in China is expected to peak. 

While demand for petrochemical feedstocks is projected to continue growing, it will not be enough to offset the decline in transportation fuels, which currently account for about 50% of China’s total oil consumption.

As China’s oil demand growth slows, the global oil market is likely to feel the effects. Over the past two decades, China has accounted for more than 50% of net global oil demand growth, so a slowdown or reversal in China’s demand trajectory could have significant implications for oil prices. 

“Without clear signs of a turn around from China oil demand then oil prices are likely to be lower in the 2H24 and into 2025,” the analysts said.

Oil prices have sold off in response to various factors, including weaker-than-expected ISM data, reduced risks from Libyan oil disruptions, and, importantly, China’s softer demand. 

Analysts at Bernstein believe that the “golden age” of China’s oil demand is drawing to a close, and this will have lasting implications for global oil markets. 

While some sectors—such as petrochemical feedstocks—may continue to support demand, the overall outlook for China’s oil consumption is one of slowing growth and eventual decline.

Commodities

Natural gas prices outlook for 2025

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — The outlook for prices in 2025 remains cautiously optimistic, influenced by a mix of global demand trends, supply-side constraints, and weather-driven uncertainties. 

As per analysts at BofA Securities, U.S. Henry Hub prices are expected to average $3.33/MMBtu for the year, marking a rebound from the low levels seen throughout much of 2024.

Natural gas prices in 2024 were characterized by subdued trading, largely oscillating between $2 and $3/MMBtu, making it the weakest year since the pandemic-induced slump in 2020. 

This price environment persisted despite record domestic demand, which averaged over 78 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), buoyed by increases in power generation needs and continued industrial activity. 

However, warm weather conditions during the 2023–24 winter suppressed residential and commercial heating demand, contributing to the overall price weakness.

Looking ahead, several factors are poised to tighten the natural gas market and elevate prices in 2025. 

A key driver is the anticipated rise in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports as new facilities, including the Plaquemines and Corpus Christi Stage 3 projects, come online. 

These additions are expected to significantly boost U.S. feedgas demand, adding strain to domestic supply and lifting prices. 

The ongoing growth in exports to Mexico via pipeline, which hit record levels in 2024, further underscores the international pull on U.S. gas.

On the domestic front, production constraints could play a pivotal role in shaping the price trajectory. 

While U.S. dry gas production remains historically robust, averaging around 101 Bcf/d in 2024, capital discipline among exploration and production companies suggests a limited ability to rapidly scale output in response to higher prices. 

Producers have strategically withheld volumes, awaiting a more favorable pricing environment. If supply fails to match the anticipated uptick in demand, analysts warn of potential upward repricing in the market.

Weather patterns remain a wildcard. Forecasts suggest that the 2024–25 winter could be 2°F colder than the previous year, potentially driving an additional 500 Bcf of seasonal demand. 

However, should warmer-than-expected temperatures materialize, the opposite effect could dampen price gains. Historically, colder winters have correlated with significant price spikes, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to heating demand.

The structural shift in the U.S. power generation mix also supports a bullish case for natural gas. Ongoing retirements of coal-fired power plants, coupled with the rise of renewable energy, have entrenched natural gas as a critical bridge fuel. 

Even as wind and solar capacity expand, natural gas is expected to fill gaps in generation during periods of low renewable output, further solidifying its role in the energy transition.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Trump picks Brooke Rollins to be agriculture secretary

letizo News

Published

on

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Brooke Rollins (NYSE:), president of the America First Policy Institute, to be agriculture secretary.

“As our next Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke will spearhead the effort to protect American Farmers, who are truly the backbone of our Country,” Trump said in a statement.

If confirmed by the Senate, Rollins would lead a 100,000-person agency with offices in every county in the country, whose remit includes farm and nutrition programs, forestry, home and farm lending, food safety, rural development, agricultural research, trade and more. It had a budget of $437.2 billion in 2024.

The nominee’s agenda would carry implications for American diets and wallets, both urban and rural. Department of Agriculture officials and staff negotiate trade deals, guide dietary recommendations, inspect meat, fight wildfires and support rural broadband, among other activities.

“Brooke’s commitment to support the American Farmer, defense of American Food Self-Sufficiency, and the restoration of Agriculture-dependent American Small Towns is second to none,” Trump said in the statement.

The America First Policy Institute is a right-leaning think tank whose personnel have worked closely with Trump’s campaign to help shape policy for his incoming administration. She chaired the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.

As agriculture secretary, Rollins would advise the administration on how and whether to implement clean fuel tax credits for biofuels at a time when the sector is hoping to grow through the production of sustainable aviation fuel.

The nominee would also guide next year’s renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal, in the shadow of disputes over Mexico’s attempt to bar imports of genetically modified corn and Canada’s dairy import quotas.

© Reuters. Brooke Rollins, President and CEO of the America First Policy Institute speaks during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden, in New York, U.S., October 27, 2024. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Trump has said he again plans to institute sweeping tariffs that are likely to affect the farm sector.

He was considering offering the role to former U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler, a staunch ally whom he chose to co-chair his inaugural committee, CNN reported on Friday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Citi simulates an increase of global oil prices to $120/bbl. Here’s what happens

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.cm — Citi Research has simulated the effects of a hypothetical oil price surge to $120 per barrel, a scenario reflecting potential geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East. 

As per Citi, such a price hike would result in a major but temporary economic disruption, with global output losses peaking at around 0.4% relative to the baseline forecast. 

While the impact diminishes over time as oil prices gradually normalize, the economic ripples are uneven across regions, flagging varying levels of resilience and policy responses.

The simulated price increase triggers a contraction in global economic output, primarily driven by higher energy costs reducing disposable incomes and corporate profit margins. 

The global output loss, though substantial at the onset, is projected to stabilize between 0.3% and 0.4% before fading as oil prices return to baseline forecasts.

The United States shows a more muted immediate output loss compared to the Euro Area or China. 

This disparity is partly attributed to the U.S.’s status as a leading oil producer, which cushions the domestic economy through wealth effects, such as stock market boosts from energy sector gains. 

However, the U.S. advantage is short-lived; tighter monetary policies to counteract inflation lead to delayed negative impacts on output.

Headline inflation globally is expected to spike by approximately two percentage points, with the U.S. experiencing a slightly more pronounced increase. 

The relatively lower taxation of energy products in the U.S. amplifies the pass-through of oil price shocks to consumers compared to Europe, where higher energy taxes buffer the direct impact.

Central bank responses diverge across regions. In the U.S., where inflation impacts are more acute, the Federal Reserve’s reaction function—based on the Taylor rule—leads to an initial tightening of monetary policy. This contrasts with more subdued policy changes in the Euro Area and China, where central banks are less aggressive in responding to the transient inflation spike.

Citi’s analysts frame this scenario within the context of ongoing geopolitical volatility, particularly in the Middle East. The model assumes a supply disruption of 2-3 million barrels per day over several months, underscoring the precariousness of energy markets to geopolitical shocks.

The report flags several broader implications. For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing short-term inflation control with the need to cushion economic output. 

For businesses and consumers, a price hike of this magnitude underscores the importance of energy cost management and diversification strategies. 

Finally, the analysts  cautions that the simulation’s results may understate risks if structural changes, such as the U.S.’s evolving role as an energy exporter, are not fully captured in the model.

While the simulation reflects a temporary shock, its findings reinforce the need for resilience in energy policies and monetary frameworks. Whether or not such a scenario materializes, Citi’s analysis provides a window into the complex interplay of economics, energy, and geopolitics in shaping global economic outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved