Commodities
Morgan Stanley cuts European oil and gas stocks amid weak demand
Investing.com — Morgan Stanley in a note dated Monday revised its outlook for key European oil and gas stocks, cutting ratings and price targets amid concerns about weakening demand.
The analysts point to a softening macroeconomic environment, which is expected to drag on both oil and gas prices over the coming years.
This comes as Morgan Stanley forecasts that will stabilize at around $75 per barrel, while European gas prices are expected to decline to about $7.0 per million cubic feet by 2026.
These projections reflect the challenges facing the industry as supply exceeds demand, particularly in Europe, where gas prices currently hover at about $11/mmcf.
In the exploration and production (E&P) sector, Aker BP (OL:), Energean (LON:), and Ithaca Energy (LON:) were among the companies most affected by these changes. Aker BP (NYSE:), once seen as a solid performer in the space, has now been downgraded to “underweight.”
Morgan Stanley analysts cite declining near-term production and high capital expenditure requirements as key reasons behind the revision.
The company’s free cash flow yield is forecasted to average only 6% between 2025 and 2026, a relatively low figure compared to its peers.
Worse yet, in a bear-case scenario where Brent crude falls to $60 per barrel, Aker BP’s free cash flow could turn negative, casting further doubt on its near-term financial performance.
The stock’s price target has been slashed to NOK 240, down from NOK 307, reflecting these risks.
Energean, another major player in the sector, has been moved to an “equal-weight” rating. Morgan Stanley reduced its price target from 1,430p to 1,100p, citing higher geopolitical and asset concentration risks.
The company’s focus on offshore Israel, particularly the Karish and Katlan fields, makes it vulnerable to geopolitical tensions. The planned sale of Energean’s Egyptian and Italian assets, while seen as strategic, further heightens its concentration risk, limiting the diversification that typically helps buffer companies against regional issues.
Despite these challenges, Energean’s strong cash flow and dividend yields, supported by long-term contracts that protect it from commodity price volatility, offer some upside. However, the elevated risk profile has prompted a more cautious stance.
Ithaca Energy has also felt the impact of Morgan Stanley’s more bearish outlook. The company’s price target has been reduced to 127p from 150p, and it too has been marked as “equal-weight.”
While Ithaca is expected to generate solid free cash flow in the near term, there are looming uncertainties tied to the UK’s fiscal regime. Frequent amendments to the UK’s energy profits levy, along with the government’s ongoing review of capital allowances, add layers of risk to Ithaca’s operations.
In Morgan Stanley’s view, these factors make it difficult for the company to fully capitalize on its production potential, especially given its exposure to UK-focused projects.
Despite the overall gloom, not all European oil and gas stocks have been downgraded. Harbour Energy (LON:) and Var Energi (OL:) remain bright spots in Morgan Stanley’s analysis, with both companies retaining “overweight” ratings due to their resilient cash flow profiles and attractive dividend yields.
Harbour Energy, which recently completed a significant transformation with the acquisition of Wintershall Dea’s assets, has emerged as one of the firm’s top picks.
With a diversified portfolio spanning multiple countries, including Norway, the UK, and Argentina, Harbour Energy is forecast to deliver an impressive free cash flow yield of 16% per annum between 2025 and 2027.
In addition, the company’s hedging strategies, particularly in gas, provide a cushion against potential declines in commodity prices, ensuring that cash flows remain strong even in bearish scenarios.
Investors can also expect substantial returns, as the company is set to distribute an 8% dividend yield, complemented by a 5% share buyback program, further enhancing shareholder value.
Var Energi, another preferred stock, is poised to benefit from its near-term production growth, driven by the Johan Castberg and Balder X projects.
Production is expected to rise by 33% over the next 15 months, ensuring strong cash flow despite the broader weakness in oil and gas markets.
Morgan Stanley forecasts a free cash flow yield of 16% on average for Var Energi in 2025-2026, with a robust dividend yield of around 14%.
Even under a bear-case scenario, where oil prices fall to $60 per barrel, Var Energi’s free cash flow yield would still stand at a resilient 11%, backed by the company’s low-cost production and strong balance sheet.
As the brokerage lowers its price targets for several major players, the focus shifts to companies with strong near-term cash flows and diversified portfolios, such as Harbour Energy and Var Energi, which are well-positioned to navigate the difficult landscape.
For companies like Aker BP, Energean, and Ithaca Energy, however, the path forward appears more fraught, as production challenges, fiscal risks, and geopolitical exposure cloud their prospects.
Commodities
Natural gas prices outlook for 2025
Investing.com — The outlook for prices in 2025 remains cautiously optimistic, influenced by a mix of global demand trends, supply-side constraints, and weather-driven uncertainties.
As per analysts at BofA Securities, U.S. Henry Hub prices are expected to average $3.33/MMBtu for the year, marking a rebound from the low levels seen throughout much of 2024.
Natural gas prices in 2024 were characterized by subdued trading, largely oscillating between $2 and $3/MMBtu, making it the weakest year since the pandemic-induced slump in 2020.
This price environment persisted despite record domestic demand, which averaged over 78 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), buoyed by increases in power generation needs and continued industrial activity.
However, warm weather conditions during the 2023–24 winter suppressed residential and commercial heating demand, contributing to the overall price weakness.
Looking ahead, several factors are poised to tighten the natural gas market and elevate prices in 2025.
A key driver is the anticipated rise in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports as new facilities, including the Plaquemines and Corpus Christi Stage 3 projects, come online.
These additions are expected to significantly boost U.S. feedgas demand, adding strain to domestic supply and lifting prices.
The ongoing growth in exports to Mexico via pipeline, which hit record levels in 2024, further underscores the international pull on U.S. gas.
On the domestic front, production constraints could play a pivotal role in shaping the price trajectory.
While U.S. dry gas production remains historically robust, averaging around 101 Bcf/d in 2024, capital discipline among exploration and production companies suggests a limited ability to rapidly scale output in response to higher prices.
Producers have strategically withheld volumes, awaiting a more favorable pricing environment. If supply fails to match the anticipated uptick in demand, analysts warn of potential upward repricing in the market.
Weather patterns remain a wildcard. Forecasts suggest that the 2024–25 winter could be 2°F colder than the previous year, potentially driving an additional 500 Bcf of seasonal demand.
However, should warmer-than-expected temperatures materialize, the opposite effect could dampen price gains. Historically, colder winters have correlated with significant price spikes, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to heating demand.
The structural shift in the U.S. power generation mix also supports a bullish case for natural gas. Ongoing retirements of coal-fired power plants, coupled with the rise of renewable energy, have entrenched natural gas as a critical bridge fuel.
Even as wind and solar capacity expand, natural gas is expected to fill gaps in generation during periods of low renewable output, further solidifying its role in the energy transition.
Commodities
Trump picks Brooke Rollins to be agriculture secretary
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Brooke Rollins (NYSE:), president of the America First Policy Institute, to be agriculture secretary.
“As our next Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke will spearhead the effort to protect American Farmers, who are truly the backbone of our Country,” Trump said in a statement.
If confirmed by the Senate, Rollins would lead a 100,000-person agency with offices in every county in the country, whose remit includes farm and nutrition programs, forestry, home and farm lending, food safety, rural development, agricultural research, trade and more. It had a budget of $437.2 billion in 2024.
The nominee’s agenda would carry implications for American diets and wallets, both urban and rural. Department of Agriculture officials and staff negotiate trade deals, guide dietary recommendations, inspect meat, fight wildfires and support rural broadband, among other activities.
“Brooke’s commitment to support the American Farmer, defense of American Food Self-Sufficiency, and the restoration of Agriculture-dependent American Small Towns is second to none,” Trump said in the statement.
The America First Policy Institute is a right-leaning think tank whose personnel have worked closely with Trump’s campaign to help shape policy for his incoming administration. She chaired the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.
As agriculture secretary, Rollins would advise the administration on how and whether to implement clean fuel tax credits for biofuels at a time when the sector is hoping to grow through the production of sustainable aviation fuel.
The nominee would also guide next year’s renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal, in the shadow of disputes over Mexico’s attempt to bar imports of genetically modified corn and Canada’s dairy import quotas.
Trump has said he again plans to institute sweeping tariffs that are likely to affect the farm sector.
He was considering offering the role to former U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler, a staunch ally whom he chose to co-chair his inaugural committee, CNN reported on Friday.
Commodities
Citi simulates an increase of global oil prices to $120/bbl. Here’s what happens
Investing.cm — Citi Research has simulated the effects of a hypothetical oil price surge to $120 per barrel, a scenario reflecting potential geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East.
As per Citi, such a price hike would result in a major but temporary economic disruption, with global output losses peaking at around 0.4% relative to the baseline forecast.
While the impact diminishes over time as oil prices gradually normalize, the economic ripples are uneven across regions, flagging varying levels of resilience and policy responses.
The simulated price increase triggers a contraction in global economic output, primarily driven by higher energy costs reducing disposable incomes and corporate profit margins.
The global output loss, though substantial at the onset, is projected to stabilize between 0.3% and 0.4% before fading as oil prices return to baseline forecasts.
The United States shows a more muted immediate output loss compared to the Euro Area or China.
This disparity is partly attributed to the U.S.’s status as a leading oil producer, which cushions the domestic economy through wealth effects, such as stock market boosts from energy sector gains.
However, the U.S. advantage is short-lived; tighter monetary policies to counteract inflation lead to delayed negative impacts on output.
Headline inflation globally is expected to spike by approximately two percentage points, with the U.S. experiencing a slightly more pronounced increase.
The relatively lower taxation of energy products in the U.S. amplifies the pass-through of oil price shocks to consumers compared to Europe, where higher energy taxes buffer the direct impact.
Central bank responses diverge across regions. In the U.S., where inflation impacts are more acute, the Federal Reserve’s reaction function—based on the Taylor rule—leads to an initial tightening of monetary policy. This contrasts with more subdued policy changes in the Euro Area and China, where central banks are less aggressive in responding to the transient inflation spike.
Citi’s analysts frame this scenario within the context of ongoing geopolitical volatility, particularly in the Middle East. The model assumes a supply disruption of 2-3 million barrels per day over several months, underscoring the precariousness of energy markets to geopolitical shocks.
The report flags several broader implications. For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing short-term inflation control with the need to cushion economic output.
For businesses and consumers, a price hike of this magnitude underscores the importance of energy cost management and diversification strategies.
Finally, the analysts cautions that the simulation’s results may understate risks if structural changes, such as the U.S.’s evolving role as an energy exporter, are not fully captured in the model.
While the simulation reflects a temporary shock, its findings reinforce the need for resilience in energy policies and monetary frameworks. Whether or not such a scenario materializes, Citi’s analysis provides a window into the complex interplay of economics, energy, and geopolitics in shaping global economic outcomes.
- Forex2 years ago
Forex Today: the dollar is gaining strength amid gloomy sentiment at the start of the Fed’s week
- Forex2 years ago
How is the Australian dollar doing today?
- Forex2 years ago
Dollar to pound sterling exchange rate today: Pound plummeted to its lowest since 1985
- Forex2 years ago
Unbiased review of Pocket Option broker
- Cryptocurrency2 years ago
What happened in the crypto market – current events today
- World2 years ago
Why are modern video games an art form?
- Commodities2 years ago
Copper continues to fall in price on expectations of lower demand in China
- Forex2 years ago
The dollar is down again against major world currencies