Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

Physical buyers win battle for copper market as funds retreat

letizo News

Published

on

By Pratima Desai

LONDON (Reuters) – Investors fleeing the market are likely to be sidelined for many months, leaving the field clear for physical players who expect demand in top consumer China and elsewhere to deteriorate over coming months and weigh on prices.

A fund buying frenzy, based on an expected shortage of copper relative to demand, sparked a rally on the London Metal Exchange (LME) earlier this year, which quickened as momentum traders entered the fray to lift prices to a record high above $11,100 a metric ton in May.

At the same time, commodity traders were buying on the LME to deliver against their commitments to sell copper on COMEX, part of CME Group (NASDAQ:).

However, copper has dropped nearly 20% since as persistently weak manufacturing activity led the physical market to reassert control, with consumers putting purchases on hold and producers and traders delivering surplus metal to LME-registered warehouses.

“Updates to demand and refined production have pushed the market to a surplus sooner than expected,” said Macquarie analyst Alice Fox, who expects copper surpluses of 265,000 metric tons this year, 305,000 tons in 2025 and 436,000 in 2026.

Fox said prices may recover in the fourth quarter if exchange stocks are drawn down.

“However, absent faster global growth boosting demand, the more sizeable surpluses in 2025 and 2026 mean this rally is likely to be short-lived,” Fox said, adding that prices could fall back towards $8,000.

BURNT FINGERS

LME copper hit 4-1/2 month lows of $8,714 a ton in early August as U.S. recession fears and concern the Federal Reserve has kept interest rates too high exacerbated negative sentiment from soaring inventories and lacklustre demand.

China consumes more than half of global refined copper supplies, estimated at around 26 million tons this year.

But much of the copper used in China is for wiring in household goods which are then exported. A housing market slump and China’s stagnant manufacturing sector highlight the headwinds copper demand faces.

“If you strip out exports, domestic demand in China looks to be anaemic. There’s no copper shortage,” said BNP Paribas (OTC:) analyst David Wilson, who expects a surplus of between 150,000 and 200,000 tons this year.

“Product fabricators have destocked. If you are a manufacturer and unsure about the outlook for demand and exports, you are not going to restock aggressively.”

Data from the International Copper Study Group (ICSG) showed a copper market surplus of 416,000 tons between January and May, laying bare the idea of large deficits this year.

Copper inventories in warehouses registered with the LME, a market of last resort, have risen to five-year highs above 300,000 tons, up around 200% since mid-May.

Most of the metal was delivered to LME warehouses in Korea and Taiwan. It came from Chinese producers unable to sell their wares to the domestic market and aiming to take advantage of LME prices above those on the Shanghai Futures Exchange.

Copper stocks in the South Korean cities of Busan and Gwangyang and Taiwan’s Kaohsiung totalling 239,100 tons now comprise 78% of total copper stocks in the LME system compared with 31,925 tons and 31% on May 16.

The threat of a prolonged strike at BHP’s Escondida copper mine in Chile, which produced nearly 5% of the world’s copper in 2023, raised concerns last week about tighter supplies but a settlement on Sunday dispelled the fears.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Raw copper from Zambia awaits export in a warehouse at Newlyn Terminal at Bayhead at the port in Durban, South Africa, April 4, 2024. REUTERS/Rogan Ward/File Photo

Over the longer term however, deficits are predicted as structural changes to copper consumption from new technologies linked to AI and the energy transition accelerate.

“We still see copper as the backbone for decarbonisation,” said Glencore (OTC:) CEO Gary Nagle at a recent briefing. “Spending on AI data centres, renewable infrastructure is very copper hungry, very copper intensive.”

Commodities

Natural gas prices outlook for 2025

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — The outlook for prices in 2025 remains cautiously optimistic, influenced by a mix of global demand trends, supply-side constraints, and weather-driven uncertainties. 

As per analysts at BofA Securities, U.S. Henry Hub prices are expected to average $3.33/MMBtu for the year, marking a rebound from the low levels seen throughout much of 2024.

Natural gas prices in 2024 were characterized by subdued trading, largely oscillating between $2 and $3/MMBtu, making it the weakest year since the pandemic-induced slump in 2020. 

This price environment persisted despite record domestic demand, which averaged over 78 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), buoyed by increases in power generation needs and continued industrial activity. 

However, warm weather conditions during the 2023–24 winter suppressed residential and commercial heating demand, contributing to the overall price weakness.

Looking ahead, several factors are poised to tighten the natural gas market and elevate prices in 2025. 

A key driver is the anticipated rise in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports as new facilities, including the Plaquemines and Corpus Christi Stage 3 projects, come online. 

These additions are expected to significantly boost U.S. feedgas demand, adding strain to domestic supply and lifting prices. 

The ongoing growth in exports to Mexico via pipeline, which hit record levels in 2024, further underscores the international pull on U.S. gas.

On the domestic front, production constraints could play a pivotal role in shaping the price trajectory. 

While U.S. dry gas production remains historically robust, averaging around 101 Bcf/d in 2024, capital discipline among exploration and production companies suggests a limited ability to rapidly scale output in response to higher prices. 

Producers have strategically withheld volumes, awaiting a more favorable pricing environment. If supply fails to match the anticipated uptick in demand, analysts warn of potential upward repricing in the market.

Weather patterns remain a wildcard. Forecasts suggest that the 2024–25 winter could be 2°F colder than the previous year, potentially driving an additional 500 Bcf of seasonal demand. 

However, should warmer-than-expected temperatures materialize, the opposite effect could dampen price gains. Historically, colder winters have correlated with significant price spikes, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to heating demand.

The structural shift in the U.S. power generation mix also supports a bullish case for natural gas. Ongoing retirements of coal-fired power plants, coupled with the rise of renewable energy, have entrenched natural gas as a critical bridge fuel. 

Even as wind and solar capacity expand, natural gas is expected to fill gaps in generation during periods of low renewable output, further solidifying its role in the energy transition.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Trump picks Brooke Rollins to be agriculture secretary

letizo News

Published

on

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Brooke Rollins (NYSE:), president of the America First Policy Institute, to be agriculture secretary.

“As our next Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke will spearhead the effort to protect American Farmers, who are truly the backbone of our Country,” Trump said in a statement.

If confirmed by the Senate, Rollins would lead a 100,000-person agency with offices in every county in the country, whose remit includes farm and nutrition programs, forestry, home and farm lending, food safety, rural development, agricultural research, trade and more. It had a budget of $437.2 billion in 2024.

The nominee’s agenda would carry implications for American diets and wallets, both urban and rural. Department of Agriculture officials and staff negotiate trade deals, guide dietary recommendations, inspect meat, fight wildfires and support rural broadband, among other activities.

“Brooke’s commitment to support the American Farmer, defense of American Food Self-Sufficiency, and the restoration of Agriculture-dependent American Small Towns is second to none,” Trump said in the statement.

The America First Policy Institute is a right-leaning think tank whose personnel have worked closely with Trump’s campaign to help shape policy for his incoming administration. She chaired the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.

As agriculture secretary, Rollins would advise the administration on how and whether to implement clean fuel tax credits for biofuels at a time when the sector is hoping to grow through the production of sustainable aviation fuel.

The nominee would also guide next year’s renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal, in the shadow of disputes over Mexico’s attempt to bar imports of genetically modified corn and Canada’s dairy import quotas.

© Reuters. Brooke Rollins, President and CEO of the America First Policy Institute speaks during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden, in New York, U.S., October 27, 2024. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Trump has said he again plans to institute sweeping tariffs that are likely to affect the farm sector.

He was considering offering the role to former U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler, a staunch ally whom he chose to co-chair his inaugural committee, CNN reported on Friday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Citi simulates an increase of global oil prices to $120/bbl. Here’s what happens

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.cm — Citi Research has simulated the effects of a hypothetical oil price surge to $120 per barrel, a scenario reflecting potential geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East. 

As per Citi, such a price hike would result in a major but temporary economic disruption, with global output losses peaking at around 0.4% relative to the baseline forecast. 

While the impact diminishes over time as oil prices gradually normalize, the economic ripples are uneven across regions, flagging varying levels of resilience and policy responses.

The simulated price increase triggers a contraction in global economic output, primarily driven by higher energy costs reducing disposable incomes and corporate profit margins. 

The global output loss, though substantial at the onset, is projected to stabilize between 0.3% and 0.4% before fading as oil prices return to baseline forecasts.

The United States shows a more muted immediate output loss compared to the Euro Area or China. 

This disparity is partly attributed to the U.S.’s status as a leading oil producer, which cushions the domestic economy through wealth effects, such as stock market boosts from energy sector gains. 

However, the U.S. advantage is short-lived; tighter monetary policies to counteract inflation lead to delayed negative impacts on output.

Headline inflation globally is expected to spike by approximately two percentage points, with the U.S. experiencing a slightly more pronounced increase. 

The relatively lower taxation of energy products in the U.S. amplifies the pass-through of oil price shocks to consumers compared to Europe, where higher energy taxes buffer the direct impact.

Central bank responses diverge across regions. In the U.S., where inflation impacts are more acute, the Federal Reserve’s reaction function—based on the Taylor rule—leads to an initial tightening of monetary policy. This contrasts with more subdued policy changes in the Euro Area and China, where central banks are less aggressive in responding to the transient inflation spike.

Citi’s analysts frame this scenario within the context of ongoing geopolitical volatility, particularly in the Middle East. The model assumes a supply disruption of 2-3 million barrels per day over several months, underscoring the precariousness of energy markets to geopolitical shocks.

The report flags several broader implications. For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing short-term inflation control with the need to cushion economic output. 

For businesses and consumers, a price hike of this magnitude underscores the importance of energy cost management and diversification strategies. 

Finally, the analysts  cautions that the simulation’s results may understate risks if structural changes, such as the U.S.’s evolving role as an energy exporter, are not fully captured in the model.

While the simulation reflects a temporary shock, its findings reinforce the need for resilience in energy policies and monetary frameworks. Whether or not such a scenario materializes, Citi’s analysis provides a window into the complex interplay of economics, energy, and geopolitics in shaping global economic outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved