Connect with us
  • tg

Commodities

What will the US elections bring for the US dollar and gold prices?

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — As the U.S. elections on November 5 approach, financial markets are keenly attuned to any shifts in economic policies that might affect the dollar and prices. If one party wins the presidential election, varying scenarios are likely to unfold regarding these key assets.

“The US dollar has a dual character meaning it has a cyclical nature, while also being the ultimate safe haven currency,” said an economist at ABN AMRO (AS:) Bank in a note. 

This duality means that in times of strong economic growth—particularly when growth outpaces inflation, real interest rates are positive, and fiscal and current account balances are improving—the dollar tends to rally. 

However, in periods of extreme market stress and liquidity shortages, the dollar’s role as a safe haven becomes paramount, driving its value up as investors seek stability.

A Democratic victory in the upcoming election, whether partial or full, is expected to have a limited impact on the U.S. dollar. As per ABN AMRO Bank, under a Democratic administration, inflation is likely to decrease, but policy rates may decline even faster, leading to a reduction in real rates, which is typically negative for a currency. 

While a slight deterioration in the fiscal balance might exert some downward pressure on the dollar, the overall impact is anticipated to be modest, resulting in a relatively stable dollar with only minor fluctuations.

In contrast, a Republican victory could lead to increased volatility for the U.S. dollar. At first, the dollar may experience a boost, fueled by expectations of stricter trade policies, such as the introduction of tariffs, which could enhance the trade balance. 

The combination of rising inflation and faster interest rate hikes compared to other nations would further support the dollar’s strength. 

However, this initial surge is likely to be temporary. As the broader economic impacts of these policies become apparent, the dollar could see a decline over the longer term.

In a scenario where a Republican administration implements widespread tariffs—a “Hard Trump” scenario—the resulting divergence between U.S. and European monetary policies could be among the most pronounced since the euro’s launch in 1999. 

This scenario could result in a depreciation of the euro relative to the dollar, potentially driving the exchange rate below parity. 

However, as market sentiment stabilizes and the negative consequences of these policies begin to impact the economy, the initial strength of the dollar could reverse, leading to a phase of marked dollar weakness.

Turning to gold, this precious metal has traditionally been viewed as a safe haven, especially during times of economic uncertainty. 

However, the dynamics of the gold market have evolved in recent years, particularly with the rise of gold ETFs, which have made gold more of a speculative asset, heavily influenced by investment flows, U.S. dollar movements, and real interest rates, rather than merely by its traditional role as a safe haven.

If the Democrats win, “we think the gold prices could be very modestly supported because we expect a modest decline in or a neutral dollar and some lower real yields. We expect gold prices to stay around USD 2,500 per ounce,” said an economist at ABN AMRO Bank.

Conversely, a Republican victory, particularly one that leads to the implementation of widespread tariffs, could create a more complicated scenario for gold.

In the early years of such an administration, rising inflation and increasing interest rates could bolster the dollar, potentially driving gold prices below their 200-day moving average, possibly down to $2,000 per ounce. 

However, as the dollar’s initial strength fades and real interest rates decrease, gold is likely to rebound, with prices potentially exceeding the highs reached earlier in 2024.

Commodities

Natural gas prices outlook for 2025

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.com — The outlook for prices in 2025 remains cautiously optimistic, influenced by a mix of global demand trends, supply-side constraints, and weather-driven uncertainties. 

As per analysts at BofA Securities, U.S. Henry Hub prices are expected to average $3.33/MMBtu for the year, marking a rebound from the low levels seen throughout much of 2024.

Natural gas prices in 2024 were characterized by subdued trading, largely oscillating between $2 and $3/MMBtu, making it the weakest year since the pandemic-induced slump in 2020. 

This price environment persisted despite record domestic demand, which averaged over 78 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), buoyed by increases in power generation needs and continued industrial activity. 

However, warm weather conditions during the 2023–24 winter suppressed residential and commercial heating demand, contributing to the overall price weakness.

Looking ahead, several factors are poised to tighten the natural gas market and elevate prices in 2025. 

A key driver is the anticipated rise in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports as new facilities, including the Plaquemines and Corpus Christi Stage 3 projects, come online. 

These additions are expected to significantly boost U.S. feedgas demand, adding strain to domestic supply and lifting prices. 

The ongoing growth in exports to Mexico via pipeline, which hit record levels in 2024, further underscores the international pull on U.S. gas.

On the domestic front, production constraints could play a pivotal role in shaping the price trajectory. 

While U.S. dry gas production remains historically robust, averaging around 101 Bcf/d in 2024, capital discipline among exploration and production companies suggests a limited ability to rapidly scale output in response to higher prices. 

Producers have strategically withheld volumes, awaiting a more favorable pricing environment. If supply fails to match the anticipated uptick in demand, analysts warn of potential upward repricing in the market.

Weather patterns remain a wildcard. Forecasts suggest that the 2024–25 winter could be 2°F colder than the previous year, potentially driving an additional 500 Bcf of seasonal demand. 

However, should warmer-than-expected temperatures materialize, the opposite effect could dampen price gains. Historically, colder winters have correlated with significant price spikes, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to heating demand.

The structural shift in the U.S. power generation mix also supports a bullish case for natural gas. Ongoing retirements of coal-fired power plants, coupled with the rise of renewable energy, have entrenched natural gas as a critical bridge fuel. 

Even as wind and solar capacity expand, natural gas is expected to fill gaps in generation during periods of low renewable output, further solidifying its role in the energy transition.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Trump picks Brooke Rollins to be agriculture secretary

letizo News

Published

on

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Brooke Rollins (NYSE:), president of the America First Policy Institute, to be agriculture secretary.

“As our next Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke will spearhead the effort to protect American Farmers, who are truly the backbone of our Country,” Trump said in a statement.

If confirmed by the Senate, Rollins would lead a 100,000-person agency with offices in every county in the country, whose remit includes farm and nutrition programs, forestry, home and farm lending, food safety, rural development, agricultural research, trade and more. It had a budget of $437.2 billion in 2024.

The nominee’s agenda would carry implications for American diets and wallets, both urban and rural. Department of Agriculture officials and staff negotiate trade deals, guide dietary recommendations, inspect meat, fight wildfires and support rural broadband, among other activities.

“Brooke’s commitment to support the American Farmer, defense of American Food Self-Sufficiency, and the restoration of Agriculture-dependent American Small Towns is second to none,” Trump said in the statement.

The America First Policy Institute is a right-leaning think tank whose personnel have worked closely with Trump’s campaign to help shape policy for his incoming administration. She chaired the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.

As agriculture secretary, Rollins would advise the administration on how and whether to implement clean fuel tax credits for biofuels at a time when the sector is hoping to grow through the production of sustainable aviation fuel.

The nominee would also guide next year’s renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal, in the shadow of disputes over Mexico’s attempt to bar imports of genetically modified corn and Canada’s dairy import quotas.

© Reuters. Brooke Rollins, President and CEO of the America First Policy Institute speaks during a rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden, in New York, U.S., October 27, 2024. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Trump has said he again plans to institute sweeping tariffs that are likely to affect the farm sector.

He was considering offering the role to former U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler, a staunch ally whom he chose to co-chair his inaugural committee, CNN reported on Friday.

Continue Reading

Commodities

Citi simulates an increase of global oil prices to $120/bbl. Here’s what happens

letizo News

Published

on

Investing.cm — Citi Research has simulated the effects of a hypothetical oil price surge to $120 per barrel, a scenario reflecting potential geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East. 

As per Citi, such a price hike would result in a major but temporary economic disruption, with global output losses peaking at around 0.4% relative to the baseline forecast. 

While the impact diminishes over time as oil prices gradually normalize, the economic ripples are uneven across regions, flagging varying levels of resilience and policy responses.

The simulated price increase triggers a contraction in global economic output, primarily driven by higher energy costs reducing disposable incomes and corporate profit margins. 

The global output loss, though substantial at the onset, is projected to stabilize between 0.3% and 0.4% before fading as oil prices return to baseline forecasts.

The United States shows a more muted immediate output loss compared to the Euro Area or China. 

This disparity is partly attributed to the U.S.’s status as a leading oil producer, which cushions the domestic economy through wealth effects, such as stock market boosts from energy sector gains. 

However, the U.S. advantage is short-lived; tighter monetary policies to counteract inflation lead to delayed negative impacts on output.

Headline inflation globally is expected to spike by approximately two percentage points, with the U.S. experiencing a slightly more pronounced increase. 

The relatively lower taxation of energy products in the U.S. amplifies the pass-through of oil price shocks to consumers compared to Europe, where higher energy taxes buffer the direct impact.

Central bank responses diverge across regions. In the U.S., where inflation impacts are more acute, the Federal Reserve’s reaction function—based on the Taylor rule—leads to an initial tightening of monetary policy. This contrasts with more subdued policy changes in the Euro Area and China, where central banks are less aggressive in responding to the transient inflation spike.

Citi’s analysts frame this scenario within the context of ongoing geopolitical volatility, particularly in the Middle East. The model assumes a supply disruption of 2-3 million barrels per day over several months, underscoring the precariousness of energy markets to geopolitical shocks.

The report flags several broader implications. For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing short-term inflation control with the need to cushion economic output. 

For businesses and consumers, a price hike of this magnitude underscores the importance of energy cost management and diversification strategies. 

Finally, the analysts  cautions that the simulation’s results may understate risks if structural changes, such as the U.S.’s evolving role as an energy exporter, are not fully captured in the model.

While the simulation reflects a temporary shock, its findings reinforce the need for resilience in energy policies and monetary frameworks. Whether or not such a scenario materializes, Citi’s analysis provides a window into the complex interplay of economics, energy, and geopolitics in shaping global economic outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved