Connect with us
  • tg

Cryptocurrency

Dirty Bitcoin: The Loudest Cryptocurrency Scandal in History

letizo News

Published

on

Dirty Bitcoin

The world of cryptocurrency has been rocked by scandals over the years, but few have been as loud and explosive as the story of “dirty bitcoin”. This term refers to the use of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for illicit activities, such as money laundering and other criminal acts. In this article, we will explore the loudest dirty cryptocurrency story ever and the impact it has had on the industry.

First, let’s define some terms. AML crypto refers to cryptocurrencies that are designed to be compliant with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Clean crypto, on the other hand, refers to cryptocurrencies that are not associated with any illicit activity. Dirty crypto is a term used to describe cryptocurrencies that have been used for criminal activity, such as money laundering or purchasing illegal goods.

The story of dirty bitcoin first gained widespread attention in 2013, when the FBI shut down the infamous Silk Road online black market. Silk Road was an anonymous online marketplace that allowed users to buy and sell drugs and other illegal goods using bitcoin. The site’s founder, Ross Ulbricht, was eventually arrested and sentenced to life in prison for his role in operating the site.

Since then, there have been numerous other high-profile cases of dirty crypto use. In 2017, for example, the WannaCry ransomware attack demanded payment in bitcoin. The attack affected over 200,000 computers in 150 countries and caused millions of dollars in damages. Similarly, the 2020 Twitter hack saw hackers use bitcoin to solicit donations in a massive cryptocurrency scam.

The use of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for illegal activities has given rise to concerns about their regulation and oversight. While AML crypto is designed to be compliant with regulations, dirty crypto is often used to evade them. This has led some governments to take a more proactive approach to regulating the industry.

For example, in 2021, the US Treasury Department proposed new regulations that would require cryptocurrency exchanges to collect more information about their customers, in an effort to crack down on money laundering and other illegal activities. Similarly, the European Union’s AMLD5 directive requires cryptocurrency exchanges to conduct due diligence on their customers and report any suspicious activity to authorities.

In conclusion, the story of dirty bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unregulated financial markets. While AML crypto and clean crypto offer potential benefits, such as greater security and transparency, it is essential to recognize that the industry is not without its risks. As governments around the world continue to grapple with the regulation of cryptocurrency, it is crucial for investors and users to exercise caution and do their due diligence before getting involved with any digital assets.

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

US Bitcoin supply fell over 10% in the past year

letizo News

Published

on

Bitcoin is increasingly active in Asia as U.S. supply share dwindles over the past two years. Bitcoin abandoned the United States during the 2022 bear market, new research suggests. In a tweet on June 8, on-chain analytics firm Glassnode revealed some surprising conclusions about who is now using Bitcoin.

BTC supply moves to Asia

The past year has seen some seismic shifts in where Bitcoin is held and traded. In its latest analysis of the BTC supply, Glassnode measured its migration around the world — notably, away from the U.S. and toward Asia. Since mid-2022, the amount of the supply held and traded by U.S. entities has decreased by more than 10%.

At the same time, Europe’s share has stayed roughly equal, translating to a redistribution from west to east.

“A clear divergence is visible in the year-over-year BTC supply change based on geographical regions. The extreme dominance of US entities in 2020-21 has clearly reversed, with US supply dominance falling by 11% since mid-2022,” Glassnode researchers commented.

“European markets have been fairly neutral over the last year, whilst a significant increase in supply dominance is visible across Asian trading hours.”

The metric used to measure the phenomenon, Year-over-Year Supply Change, is a probabilistic tool that makes assumptions over BTC supply ownership based on the time at which it moves.

“Geolocation of Bitcoin supply is performed probabilistically at the entity level. The timestamps of all transactions created by an entity are correlated with the working hours of different geographical regions to determine the probabilities for each entity being located in the US, Europe, or Asia,” Glassnode explains in its guidance notes.

TheYear-over-year Supply Change shows the U.S. share beginning to decline in March 2021 but accelerating beginning in May this year.

Coinbase CEO says U.S. must “seize” crypto opportunities

The findings come as the geopolitical landscape around crypto sees major upheaval of its own. Hong Kong began allowing exchanges to offer trading this month, while in the West, U.S. legal proceedings against major exchanges marked something of a watershed moment for the industry.

In an opinion piece for MarketWatch, Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase — one of the targets of the legal action — warned that poor regulation would disadvantage the United States.

“Smart—and bespoke—regulation in the 1990s and early 2000s enabled the U.S. to define the Internet Age,” he wrote.

“Just like then, now is the time for Congress to seize the historic opportunity presented by crypto, and pass comprehensive legislation that safeguards consumers and fosters innovation.”

On the topic of Hong Kong, Armstrong added that China pushing the crypto narrative was “no surprise.”

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Gary Gensler: Crypto market is like 1920s stock market, full of ‘fraudsters’

letizo News

Published

on

Gensler argued that securities laws helped prevent stock market scams once they were passed in the 1930s and can benefit the crypto market of today.

In a June 8 speech at the Piper Sandler Global Exchange & Fintech Conference, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler compared the current crypto market to the 1920s U.S. stock market, saying that it is full of “hucksters,” “fraudsters” and “Ponzi schemes.” Just as Congress cleaned up the stock market by enacting securities laws, the current SEC can also clean up the crypto market by applying these laws, he argued.

In the talk, Gensler praised the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, claiming that these laws allowed the U.S. securities markets to “thrive” over the next 88 years. He argued that the “crypto securities markets” of today should also benefit from these laws, as they are not “less deserving of the protections” the laws provide.

Pointing to a court ruling against Telegram Open Network, Gensler argued that crypto asset securities are not exempt from securities laws even if they have utility.

“Some promoters of crypto asset securities contend that their token has a function beyond simply being an investment vehicle,” Gensler stated. “As the courts in the Telegram case and others have said, however, some additional utility does not remove a crypto asset security from the definition of an investment contract.”

This means that crypto security exchanges must comply with securities laws, including the requirement to separate “the exchange, broker-dealer and clearing functions,” Gensler stated. In his view, this separation “helps mitigate the conflicts that can arise with the commingling of such services.”

Gensler denied that this separation isn’t possible, saying that separating these three functions simply requires work.

The SEC head argued that the current crypto market is rife with scams that have arisen because of the industry’s lack of compliance with securities laws, stating:

“With wide-ranging noncompliance, frankly, it’s not surprising that we’ve seen many problems in these markets. We’ve seen this story before. It’s reminiscent of what we had in the 1920s before the federal securities laws were put in place. Hucksters. Fraudsters. Scam artists. Ponzi schemes.”

The solution, in Gensler’s view, is to make sure that crypto securities issuers comply with the law. This is because these scams are “more likely to happen in markets whose issuers and intermediaries fail to comply with foundational laws.”

As chair of the SEC, Gensler has been heavily criticized within the crypto industry, especially since the SEC filed lawsuits against crypto exchanges Binance and Coinbase. Critics say he has an overly expansive view of the SEC’s regulatory authority and is driving innovation out of the U.S.

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Binance vs. SEC: How low can BNB price go?

letizo News

Published

on

BNB is clinging on to its short-term bullish bias amid the Binance-SEC fiasco, but a 30% price decline is still on the cards.

The market capitalization of BNB has dropped by more than $7 billion since June 5, when the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance.

BNB price eyes technical bounce

The impact of the SEC lawsuit on Binance has been substantial so far, with BNB down nearly 15% week-to-date.

On June 6, the SEC requested the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to freeze Binance’s U.S. assets worldwide. The order, if passed, will likely force the exchange to repatriate “fiat currency and crypto assets deposited, held, traded, and accrued by customers” at its U.S. platform.

Meanwhile, Binance’s U.S. entity halted trading for several pairs, including Bitcoin, Tether and BUSD.

Theoretically, these events risk stirring people’s BNB buying sentiment, given it has been incorporated as a utility token in the Binance ecosystem.

However, technicals paint a potentially different picture, at least in the short term. The BNB/USD pair looks prepared for a short-term bounce, given it trades around a critical support level and its daily relative strength index (RSI) has entered the “oversold” region below 30.

In this case, BNB price will likely eye its descending trendline resistance point near $280 as its next upside target in June, up around 7% from current price levels.

On the other hand, BNB’s decisive close below its multimonth ascending trendline support means that $240 should be watched as a potential downside target in June. Down around 10% from current price levels, this level appears out of the rising wedge breakdown scenario (purple). 

Binance’s BNB token to $180 in 2023?

Independent market analyst TraderSZ believes BNB could drop toward the 2022 low of $180 owing to the ongoing Binance-SEC battle. Interestingly, the ongoing breakdown of a descending triangle pattern for BNB price suggests the same.

Descending triangles are typically viewed as bearish continuation patterns in a general downtrend. They typically resolve when the price breaks below their lower trendline support with the price dropping by as much as their maximum height.

As a result, BNB risks falling toward its triangle target of around $180 in 2023, down around 30% from current price levels.

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2023 Letizo All Rights Reserved