Cryptocurrency
The 5 Best Bitcoin Mining Pools in 2025: Complete Guide

A Bitcoin mining pool is a group of miners who combine their computational (hash) power to boost their chances of mining new blocks. To explain more simply, the miners connect the mining hardware at the pool’s server rather than creating your own. Moreover, the pool rewards are distributed among participants based on how much hash power each provides.
Mining pools emerged as Bitcoin mining became more competitive and resource-intensive, making it difficult for smaller, solo miners to earn consistent rewards. Without considering the expense of energy and power supplies, the user would need considerable resources and capital to earn a consistent, lucrative reward.
Quick Navigation
Benefits of Joining a Mining Pool
- Consistency: More frequent rewards compared to solo mining.
- Accessibility: You can participate without massive hardware or electricity investments.
- Assistance: Many pools offer less-experienced miners support, tools, and guidance.
Mining pools also enhance network security by increasing the number of miners involved, maintaining decentralization, and preventing any one entity from dominating the blockchain.
It’s a tough market out there for miners, given how fierce the competition is, which is why most would opt for pool mining due to steadier returns while still contributing to the network’s security and decentralization. But, like anything in life, there are a few pros and cons to each:
Solo mining pros:
- Full control over any mined rewards.
- No fees to a pool operator.
And cons:
- Irregular rewards; potentially very long gaps between successes.
- High cost for hardware and electricity.
Pool mining pros:
- More consistent earnings due to collaborative efforts.
- Lower initial investment compared to solo mining.
And cons:
- Pool fees reduce overall profit.
- Less autonomy since the pool operator often makes decisions.
How Does Bitcoin Mining Work?
Now that the basics have been explained, it’s time to dive a bit deeper into the specifics. To explain how Bitcoin mining works, let’s use setting up and joining a BTC mining pool as an example.
Choosing a Bitcoin Miner
Most Bitcoin miners use ASIC devices, like an Antminer S19 or S9, because traditional GPUs and CPUs are no longer profitable for BTC mining. The mining rig should meet current efficiency standards to stay competitive.
Moving on, match your power supply unit (PSU) to the miner’s power draw. For instance, an Antminer S9 can consume approximately 1,375 watts, so a robust and reliable PSU is essential.
Next, set up a stable, wired Ethernet connection (recommended) to minimize downtime and ensure your rig can communicate consistently with the pool’s servers. This is because your shares (i.e., your units of work to prove your contribution to solving the cryptographic puzzle) must be submitted as quickly as possible, and wireless connections may experience interruptions due to multiple elements (physical obstacles, high latency, inconsistent bandwidth due to network congestion, etc.).
Miner Settings and Pool Navigation
Naturally, you want to plug in the miner and the PSU and connect an Ethernet cable to your local network. The next step is to use a network scanner, like Angry IP Scanner, to find your miner on your local network.
The tool will scan your network and show the IP addresses of all connected devices. Find the miner’s IP address and enter it into a web browser to open its control panel. Miners have default login details, often “root/root” username and password, but you may want to immediately change these credentials for security so no one else can access your miner.
Selecting a Bitcoin Mining Pool
New miners should research pools based on fees, payout schemes, security measures, and server geography. Some of the best Bitcoin mining pools include F2Pool, Foundry USA Pool, and Slush Pool.
Once you’ve selected a pool, you must create your worker credentials, which are basically your username and password. Your username (should be) often a combination of your pool account name and an optional “worker” identifier (e.g., account_name.worker_name), but the password can be of any value (or the one suggested by the mining pool).
Configuring the Miner
Next, check the pool’s website and go to the dashboard to check the list of Stratum addresses. This is a URL protocol that your miner will use to submit work and receive tasks. While mining pools offer a general/default Stratum URL, ideally, you want to choose the closest server geographically due to lower latency and better efficiency.
For example, in North America, it should be something like this:
stratum+tcp://btc-na.f2pool.com:3333.
In your rig’s control dashboard, go to miner configuration or settings and enter the Stratum address specific to your chosen mining pool, along with your pool username and password.
After saving, your miner will begin directing its hashing power toward the pool.
Linking a Bitcoin Wallet
Connect your Bitcoin wallet address to the pool. This can be part of your account profile on the pool’s website. Some pools allow participants to set a minimum payout threshold, controlling how often their earnings are sent to their wallets.
If you don’t have one already, check out our guide on some of the best Bitcoin wallets in 2025, from hot to cold solutions.
Starting the Mining Process
After it is configured, your miner will send shares (the units of work) to the pool, which aggregates all participants’ hashing power to find valid blocks. In return, you receive a percentage of block rewards proportional to your contribution. The more you contribute, the more you are rewarded.
You can monitor your miner’s performance either through its own interface or the pool’s website.
How Are Rewards Distributed in Bitcoin Mining Pools?
There are three types of payout models for rewards. Each approach involves specific trade-offs concerning fees, rewards, and risk:
- Pay-Per-Share (PPS): With PPS, you receive a fixed, predetermined payout for every share your mining hardware submits to the pool. The pool operator absorbs the risk of whether a block is actually found, offering you predictable and steady income.
- Full Pay-Per-Share (FPPS): FPPS builds on PPS by paying a fixed rate per share and including an estimated share of transaction fees in addition to the block reward. This method offers even more predictable earnings by smoothing out the variability of transaction fee income, but it can come with slightly higher fees since the pool operator is assuming more risk.
- Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares (PPLNS): This method pays out only when the pool finds a block, distributing rewards based on the proportion of the last N shares submitted by all miners. Your payout can fluctuate. If the pool is unlucky or you disconnect before a block is found, your earnings for that period may be low or zero. Over time, however, this method can yield higher rewards during lucky periods.
How to Choose the Proper Payout Method
Choosing a reward distribution model is as important as choosing the right pool. There are four main points to consider: risk tolerance, fees, mining goals, and dependency on operators, which can be summarized as follows:
- PPS and FPPS are good fits for those who prefer a steady income and avoid fluctuations tied to block discovery. However, PPS and FPPS pools tend to charge higher fees because they assume more risk but pay their participants regardless of block discovery.
- However, PPLNS pools offer lower fees but are much more volatile. They often have uneven payouts depending on how often the pool finds blocks. In other words, the more blocks that are found, the higher the yield.
Generally speaking, there are two reasons why a miner would choose PPs or FPPS: either they have limited resources, or they want predictable, steady income. However, those with substantial hashing power and resources often gravitate toward PPLNS because of the bigger yields. This maximizes overall earnings in times of bullish market activity but accepts some short-term uncertainty, all in exchange for the biggest rewards.
Risks of Using Bitcoin Mining Pools
When using a BTC mining pool, there are three main risks miners should be aware of.
It’s no secret that large pools can dominate the share of the Bitcoin network’s total hashrate. Such a concentration of power defeats the purpose of decentralization, as a few entities wield increased influence over transaction validation and block production.
Another risk to consider is chain and pool manipulation. Pools may commit certain unethical practices, like withholding valid blocks to gain an advantage or censoring specific transactions to compromise the network’s security and trustworthiness. Moreover, operators hold significant control over reward distribution, and those dishonest may manipulate payouts, delay rewards, or even vanish with participants’ funds (in what is known as an exit scam).
When assessing any mining pool, it’s prudent to verify its track record of uptime, the security measures in place, such as advanced Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) protection, and its history of handling potential threats. In that sense, a secure and dependable pool protects your earnings and operational consistency.
A pool experiencing repeated disruptions (DDoS attacks, most often) can lead to server downtime, impacting profits. For instance, in 2020, Poolin, one of the largest Bitcoin mining pools at the time, suffered a DDoS attack in which the pool’s servers were flooded with malicious traffic. This caused downtime and a loss of revenue for participating miners.
In addition to the above, researching a pool’s reputation and transaction history is always a fundamental step before joining one.
But even so, there’s no guarantee that a reputable mining pool won’t engage in questionable behavior. For instance, F2Pool, a leading miner in terms of network hashrate, drew criticism back in 2023 when it began filtering transactions linked to addresses sanctioned by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It was found that the pool excluded specific transactions from its blocks, imposing external compliance measures within what is intended to be a neutral, decentralized network.
Needless to say, this action ran counter to Bitcoin’s principle of censorship resistance, sparking community backlash. F2Pool eventually halted its filtering patch, but the point remains the same.
Best Bitcoin Mining Pools
Some of the top Bitcoin mining pools are listed below, according to their hashpower, popularity, payouts and fees, security, and key features, among other crucial considerations.
Foundry USA
Foundry USA is the largest Bitcoin pool in 2025, controlling over 30% of the network hashrate.
Key Features
- Institutional-grade services: In addition to standard pool operations, Foundry offers treasury management, BTC custody, and derivatives products, which are mostly targeted at large-scale enterprises.
- Security and compliance: Foundry has SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 certifications, which means strong internal controls and operations. Moreover, all members must fulfill Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements before joining, which may deter miners who prefer anonymity but provides a safer environment for both retailers and mining companies.
- Transparency and reliability: Detailed fee structures, exportable data, and in-depth analytics. This allows miners to evaluate and track their performance much more efficiently.
Fees and Payment Methods
Foundry USA has a tiered structure that adjusts rates according to a miner’s quarterly average hashrate. Deductions come from the FPPS payouts, including newly minted Bitcoin, e.g., block subsidies and transaction fees. Under FPPS, miners benefit from regular and predictable payments credited daily.
Moreover, a 0.001 BTC minimum payout threshold makes Foundry approachable for smaller-scale operations, allowing frequent distributions even for those not contributing massive amounts of hash power.
Hashrate and Supported Equipment
Foundry USA is the largest mining pool, contributing roughly 277 to 280 EH/s to the Bitcoin network. This means it finds blocks quickly, providing reliable payouts for participating miners.
The pool supports various popular ASIC miners, including Antminer S19 models, WhatsMiner M50 series, and AvalonMiner rigs.
Pros and Cons
Pros explained:
- Stable FPPS payouts, which include transaction fees
- High-level security with SOC certifications and robust compliance measures
- Institutional services, providing lending, custody, and advanced financial products
- Advanced analytics and tools for miners
Cons explained:
- KYC/AML requirements, which can be off-putting for certain miners
- Holding over a third of the network hashrate means the pool has a massive influence on the Bitcoin network
AntPool
AntPool, launched by Bitmain Technologies in 2014, remains one of the most influential Bitcoin mining pools.
As of early 2025, it commands close to 19% of the network’s total hashrate, providing miners with a robust infrastructure and multiple reward structures. Although primarily focused on Bitcoin, AntPool also supports other proof-of-work cryptocurrencies.
Key Features
- Multi-currency support: In addition to Bitcoin, AntPool supports Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Litecoin, among other popular PoW options.
- Global server: AntPool operates servers worldwide, helping reduce latency and stale shares. This network design contributes to more stable performance, regardless of a miner’s geographic location.
- Daily payouts and reliability: Once a miner’s balance reaches 0.001 BTC, earnings are sent out every 24 hours. Security measures include two-factor authentication (2FA), DDoS protection, and wallet locks, all of which safeguard user accounts.
- Tools and resources for miners: The dashboard offers real-time hashrate metrics, detailed income histories, and integrated profitability calculators. These features simplify monitoring and help users fine-tune their operations.
Fees and Payment Methods
AntPool offers three payout schemes, and they come with varying fees, influencing individual earnings:
- PPLNS: 0% fee (transaction fees not included).
- PPS+: 2.5% fee.
- FPPS: 4% fee.
Miners receive payouts once they exceed the 0.001 BTC threshold. Distributions occur daily after that balance is reached.
Hashrate and Supported Equipment
With a reported output of approximately 132.7 EH/s, AntPool contributes close to 19% of the total Bitcoin network hashrate. AntPool accepts many ASIC miners, including Bitmain’s Antminer series (S19 Pro, S19 XP), WhatsMiner (M50), and AvalonMiner devices. Although it is developed by Bitmain, other SHA-256 ASIC rigs can connect without issue.
Pros and Cons
Pros explained:
- Multiple payout models
- Zero fee for PPLNS (transaction fees not included)
- Backed by Bitmain’s longstanding mining expertise
- Global server infrastructure for reduced latency
Cons explained:
- FPPS has a higher fee (4%) compared to some alternatives
- Large share of hashrate may increase centralization concerns
- Some users find the interface less streamlined than other pools
ViaBTC
ViaBTC is one of the best crypto mining pools, with a reputation for robust infrastructure, extensive coin support, and a vast suite of resources and tools for miners.
Headquartered in China, it has become the third-largest Bitcoin mining pool globally, holding about 14% of the network’s hashrate as of early 2025. In addition to BTC, ViaBTC covers numerous other PoW cryptocurrencies.
Key Features
- Wide range of assets: ViaBTC supports over 20 crypto assets, including BTC, BCH, LTC/DOGE (merged mining), ZEC, and DASH.
- Global server: Distributed servers minimize latency and ensure stable connections for participants across different regions.
- Auto-conversion: Miners are not required to manually trade their BTC earnings as the pool can automatically convert their profits.
- Security measures: ViaBTC implements two-factor authentication (2FA), multi-level risk controls, and wallet locks for enhanced account protection.
- Advanced tools and cloud mining: The pool offers real-time performance tracking, mobile apps for on-the-go monitoring, and a cloud mining feature for those who prefer mining without owning physical equipment.
Fees and Payment Methods
ViaBTC offers PPS and PPLNS for miners, charging 4% and 2%, respectively.
Hashrate and Supported Equipment
ViaBTC contributes around 83.5 EH/s, accounting for approximately 14% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate.
Moreover, ViaBTC supports ASIC miners for Bitcoin and other SHA-256 coins and GPU rigs for altcoins such as Ethereum Classic (ETC) or Zcash (ZEC). It also offers various setup guides for mining software like PhoenixMiner or T-Rex Miner.
The default minimum threshold for payouts is 0.0001 BTC, making the pool accessible to smaller-scale participants. Miners are paid once they exceed this amount, with disbursements typically processed daily.
Pros and Cons
Pros explained:
- Supports multiple cryptocurrencies for diversification
- Different payout methods
- Low payout threshold to suit smaller miners
- Strong security features
- Auto conversion and other tools to simplify user experience
Cons explained:
- PPS fees are higher than most competitors
- Cloud mining is still considered risky as it’s often associated with market volatility
Luxor Mining Pool
Luxor Mining Pool, established in 2018, is a North American-based operation recognized for its Full Pay Per Share (FPPS) model and broad support for multiple cryptocurrencies.
Though its Bitcoin hashrate is lower than some market-leading pools, Luxor remains a strong choice for miners seeking hourly payouts, competitive fees, and extra services like Catalyst, which allows mining altcoins but receiving rewards in Bitcoin.
Key Features
- Catalyst service: Multi-coin miners can direct their hash power to coins like Zcash or Dash but opt for Bitcoin payouts, simplifying portfolio management across various networks.
- Global servers: These are spread across Asia, Europe, and the Americas to reduce latency and bolster uptime for miners worldwide.
- Advanced analytics and developer tools: Luxor’s dashboard offers detailed performance tracking, an API for custom integrations, and user-friendly resources for real-time monitoring.
- Security: The pool is certified SOC 2 Type 2, bolsters accounts with 2FA, and maintains cloud redundancy to safeguard miner data.
- Tax reporting integration: Miners can partner with Luxor’s recommended platforms to automate tax filings for cryptocurrency revenues, streamlining compliance.
Fees and Payment Methods
The pool charges a fee of 0.7% for Bitcoin, only under the FPPS system, with consistent hourly payouts based on submitted shares, including block rewards and transaction fees. For altcoins, the fee structure may vary, as some altcoins use PPS or PPLNS models (occasionally at 0% for PPLNS).
Luxor’s 0.7% fee under FPPS compares favorably against other major pools, especially those with higher percentages for full pay-per-share payouts.
Hashrate and Supported Equipment
Luxor contributes an estimated 20 EH/s to the Bitcoin network, which puts it behind some larger competitors yet keeps it influential in North America.
The pool works with leading ASIC miners:
- Bitmain Antminer (e.g., S19 Pro, S19 XP)
- WhatsMiner (e.g., M50 series)
- AvalonMiner devices
GPU mining is also supported under the Catalyst feature for certain altcoins. The minimum Bitcoin payout is 0.004 BTC.
Pros and Cons
Pros explained:
- Competitive 0.7% FPPS fee
- Hourly payouts for stable earnings
- Catalyst service converts altcoin gains into Bitcoin
- Strong security (SOC 2 Type 2, 2FA)
- Developer-friendly API for advanced analytics
Cons explained:
- Roughly 20 EH/s—smaller than major pools like Foundry USA or AntPool
- Higher payout threshold (0.004 BTC) can be less convenient for small-scale miners
- No merged mining support (cannot mine multiple coins simultaneously under a single algorithm)
F2Pool
F2Pool is among the market’s longest-running and most diverse cryptocurrency mining pools. Established in 2013, it supports over 40 digital assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum PoW (ETHW), Litecoin (LTC), and many more.
Alongside its broad coin coverage, F2Pool offers a range of payout structures (PPS+, FPPS, and PPLNS), daily automatic distributions, and strong security features to safeguard miners’ earnings.
Key Features
- Multi-currency support: F2Pool accommodates more than 40 cryptocurrencies. It also supports different hardware for these altcoins.
- Advanced tools: F2Pool delivers in-depth statistics like real-time hashrate monitoring, revenue history, and profitability projections. It also supports cross-platform accessibility through web and mobile apps, making it straightforward for miners to track and manage their operations on the go.
- Security measures: Strong DDoS defenses and secure payout systems help minimize disruptions. The company’s reputation, built over nearly a decade, is a testament to its dependable infrastructure and prompt responses to potential threats.
Fees and Payment Methods
2FPool offers three types of payment methods, depending on the user’s need: PPS+, FPPS, and PPLNS.
F2Pool’s Bitcoin mining fees vary based on the payout model, generally ranging from 2% for PPLNS to 4% for FPPS. Although this may be slightly higher than smaller pools, many miners find the stability and reliability worthwhile. Again, it all depends on the user’s goals and needs.
Bitcoin miners can expect a minimum payout of 0.005 BTC by default, which they can adjust in their account settings to suit their preferences.
Hashrate and Supported Equipment
F2Pool provides about 10% of the total Bitcoin network hashrate in 2025, translating into roughly 81.4 EH/s. This means the pool often finds blocks relatively quickly. Moreover, most modern ASIC devices, like the Antminer S19 series, are compatible, and F2Pool also accommodates GPU mining for certain altcoins.
Pros and Cons
Pros explained:
- A solid track record since 2013
- A wide range of mineable cryptocurrencies
- Comprehensive mining statistics and real-time monitoring
- Robust security and DDoS protections
Cons explained:
- Higher fees than some competing pools
- Has engaged in questionable practices that contradict Bitcoin’s decentralized nature, fueling concerns about Bitcoin mining centralization
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Cryptocurrency
Bitcoin Price Analysis: $100K Breakdown Looms for BTC if This Support Fails

Bitcoin came under notable selling pressure following heightened geopolitical concerns stemming from the escalating conflict between Russia and the United States over nuclear threats.
Despite the bearish momentum, the cryptocurrency has now reached a key support zone, expected to hold in the short term.
Technical Analysis
By ShayanMarkets
The Daily Chart
After a prolonged consolidation within the $116K–$123K range, BTC encountered heavy selling pressure, driven by escalating concerns over the Russia–US nuclear conflict. This led to a breakdown below the critical $114K support, sparking fear and uncertainty in the market.
However, BTC has now approached a major support zone between $111K and $112K, an area defined by the lower boundary of a multi-month ascending channel and a key previous swing high.
This confluence of technical support is likely to attract patient buyers, potentially initiating a bullish consolidation phase. Still, if the price fails to hold above this region, a rapid decline toward the psychological $100K level could follow.
The 4-Hour Chart
On the lower timeframe, Bitcoin’s breakdown from the bullish flag pattern marks a bearish technical signal, confirming the pattern’s failure. The sharp rejection from the flag’s upper boundary triggered a steep decline, bringing the price to a critical support near the $112K zone, which also aligns with the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level. This particular one often acts as a magnet for short-term bullish reactions.
As long as the price holds above this range, a corrective bounce is likely. However, if bearish momentum persists, another sell-off targeting a sweep below $111K–$112K may occur. Until then, short-term consolidation remains the most probable outcome.
On-chain Analysis
By ShayanMarkets
The Exchange Netflow indicator shows that 16,417 BTC flowed into exchanges yesterday, the highest daily net inflow since mid-July. This suggests a significant number of holders are moving their Bitcoin to exchanges, typically a precursor to selling activity.
At the same time, the Exchange Whale Ratio surged above 0.70, indicating that the majority of these deposits came from large holders (whales). Historically, when whale-dominated inflows coincide with elevated exchange activity, the market often faces increased selling pressure and price declines.
If this trend continues and whales persist in depositing BTC at this pace, further downside risk could follow. Such activity may reflect profit-taking, preparation for a correction, or strategic reallocation in anticipation of near-term volatility.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
Cryptocurrency charts by TradingView.
Cryptocurrency
RISC-V on Ethereum: Scalable Future or Risky Reboot?

Just over a year after the Dencun upgrade gave Layer 2 networks a massive boost, and only months before the much-anticipated Fusaka release, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin floated a bold proposal.
In an April forum post, he suggested the network could eventually replace its longtime workhorse, the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), with RISC-V, a low-level, open-source instruction set architecture.
The Allure of a New Foundation
For those unfamiliar, the EVM is the execution engine powering every smart contract on Ethereum. It translates Solidity code into machine-level instructions and governs how contracts interact. It’s been the backbone of Ethereum since its inception. So when Buterin brought up the idea of swapping it out, it sent ripples through the community.
His reasoning is rooted in long-term scalability:
“The beam chain effort holds great promise for simplifying the consensus layer,” he wrote. “But for the execution layer to see similar gains, this kind of radical change may be the only viable path.”
Buterin argued that a RISC-V-based virtual machine could drastically speed up zero-knowledge proof generation by up to 100 times. This could be a game-changer for zk-rollups, which are seen as Ethereum’s best shot at scaling securely. By removing the need to translate code twice, from Solidity to EVM, and then to zk-friendly formats, RISC-V could streamline proof generation and reduce computational costs.
However, it’s one thing to float an idea, and it’s another to overhaul the very heart of the Ethereum ecosystem. Stuart Popejoy, co-founder and CEO of proof-of-work Layer 1 blockchain Kadena, was blunt about the scale of disruption:
“There’s no future in which there’s a large short-term disruption because it couldn’t possibly happen fast,” he told CryptoPotato. “A ‘better’ system would have to run in parallel for years as well as accumulate the network effects the EVM has.”
Popejoy, whose platform’s Chainweb EVM testnet recently went live, argues that replacing the EVM isn’t like switching out a database or upgrading a protocol. It’s like asking the internet to replace HTTP; theoretically possible but practically absurd.
That doesn’t mean the idea lacks merit. According to blockchain researcher Blessing Onuogu, the proposal is “complex and ambitious” but could lead to a “more scalable and efficient Ethereum.” She believes RISC-V’s performance potential might allow for more sophisticated smart contracts, ones that currently strain the EVM’s stack-based architecture.
The technical advantages of RISC-V aren’t in question. It’s open, customizable, and already used in projects like Nervos. It’s also friendly to parallel execution and zero-knowledge applications.
“ZK-STARK and ZK-SNARK rollups could reduce proving times and costs,” noted pseudonymous developer Block.nm. “With register-based execution, it’s easier to write provable programs.”
However, integrating RISC-V into Ethereum is not just a software upgrade. It’s a full ecosystem reboot. To start, smart contracts are immutable. You can’t just migrate them. As Popejoy explained, “Existing state is cryptographically tied to specific addresses on the EVM.” Rewriting contracts from scratch would be mandatory. So would re-auditing them.
And herein lies a deeper challenge: the loss of a decade’s worth of security insights.
“We’d reset 10 years of accumulated security knowledge to zero,” Popejoy warned. “We have learned a lot about the EVM; all of this would become irrelevant.”
Compatibility concerns also extend to Ethereum’s L2s. Fraud proofs on Optimism and Arbitrum rely on L1 executing EVM bytecode to validate rollup transactions. Swap out the EVM, and you break that.
“You’d have to build a full EVM interpreter in RISC-V,” Popejoy noted. “That defeats the purpose of making it cheaper and faster.”
If that’s not feasible, then L2s may be forced to become sovereign chains, splintering the ecosystem and breaking composability.
So What’s the Path Forward?
Most experts agree: there is no clean break. The only realistic scenario, according to some, involves dual-VM support for at least a decade. New contracts could use the faster RISC-V architecture while legacy ones would continue running on the EVM. Over time, developers might migrate voluntarily if the benefits are clear and the tooling is robust.
“Dual VM support would give developers flexibility,” Onuogu said. “It allows time to adapt and ensures continuity.” She emphasized the need for a gradual rollout, similar to how zk-rollups were introduced without disrupting existing apps.
Meanwhile, L2 developers should already be preparing. Block.nm recommends investing in modular architectures today, abstracting proof systems, decoupling settlement layers, and experimenting with alternate compilers like LLVM IR and WebAssembly. “Don’t rely exclusively on Solidity,” they cautioned.
But even with preparation, the migration won’t be easy. Ethereum is home to tens of thousands of apps, billions in value, and millions of users. Each has different dependencies. A new VM must somehow honor those relationships or risk fragmenting the community. And yet, the conversation around replacing the EVM reflects a larger truth: Ethereum must evolve.
While the Dencun and Pectra upgrades addressed key bottlenecks, they only pushed scaling so far. The network’s base layer is still burdened by complexity, slow execution, and monolithic design. As Buterin and others have noted, long-term sustainability may demand simpler, cleaner architecture, especially with competitors like Solana, Sui, and modular rollup frameworks chipping away at Ethereum’s dominance.
That’s why proposals like EIP-7983, which caps gas usage per transaction, are gaining momentum. They promise greater predictability, faster block propagation, and better support for zk execution, all while minimizing disruption. These incremental changes are a reflection of Ethereum’s emerging design ethos: simplify where possible, preserve where necessary.
RISC-V is no silver bullet, though. And as Popejoy said, it may never replace the EVM. But it opens the door to experimentation. If Ethereum wants to remain the world’s leading programmable blockchain, it can’t rest on its legacy stack.
“Ethereum’s evolution isn’t about replacing everything we’ve built,” Onuogu concluded. “It’s about building what comes next, carefully, openly, and with the whole ecosystem in mind.”
That evolution may take 10 years or more, but it looks like it has already begun.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Cryptocurrency
How Ripple Sees the Future: The Stablecoin Landscape for 2025 and Beyond

In today’s highly interconnected economy, the need for quick, effective, and transparent payment solutions has reached an all-time high.
From corporate finance and worldwide supply chains to workers and online commerce, countless individuals rely on daily cross-border payments, which is where stablecoins have stepped up.
How Stablecoins Are Changing The Global Payments System
Stablecoins are digital assets created and stored on the blockchain, designed to maintain a stable value by being pegged to a reserve asset, most commonly fiat currency, such as the US dollar or the Euro.
Due to the implied resilience from this fact, they offer greater price stability than other cryptocurrencies, making them a good entry point into the crypto universe for more risk-averse individuals or institutions.
These assets have been gaining significant traction across Web2 and Web3, and their increasing usage is further bolstered by their ability to enable more efficient cross-border payments, offer near-instant settlements, reduce costs, and be available 24/7.
Stablecoins like USDT, USDC, and RLUSD, as well as region-specific tokens, are being integrated into wallets and payments platforms worldwide, particularly in areas where the local currency experiences greater volatility.
Ripple’s New Value Report for 2025: Stablecoin Trends in Business and Beyond found that finance leaders worldwide are suggesting that stablecoins will primarily be used in international, consumer-to-business, and vendor-to-supplier payments.
Some Popular Stablecoins For Business Payouts In 2025
Fiat-pegged assets can differ in various ways, including market availability, liquidity, supported blockchains, and more, so businesses and individuals should carefully consider how they can best serve the use case they are looking for.
Here are some examples of stablecoin and cross-border payment providers reshaping the landscape of how payments are made around the world:
- Tether (USDT)
– most widely used and largest by market cap ($163B+ at print time, as per data from CoinMarketCap)
– popular in emerging markets where access to USD is limited
– integrated into most major crypto exchanges and peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms - Circle (USDC)
– insured by cash-equivalent reserves
– compliant and partnered with goliaths such as Visa, Stripe, and more
– widespread use for business-to-business (B2B) payments - Ripple (RLUSD)
– backed by a segregated reserve of cash and cash equivalents
– supports third-party payments globally, emerging markets included
– integrated into a licensed cross-border payments solution – Ripple Payments
Traditional Finance and Stablecoins
A growing number of traditional finance (TradFi) transnational payment providers have begun incorporating stablecoins into their operations to provide more options for their customers and improve their internal treasury payments.
Visa has been settling transactions in stablecoins since 2023, and to date, over $225 million has been processed through this method. Moreover, they have facilitated nearly $100B in purchases of cryptocurrencies and over $25 billion in such spending.
Mastercard very recently announced an end-to-end payments system using stablecoins, and WorldPay has plans to enable payouts in this asset class to global enterprises.
Businesses are also exploring how these assets can enhance their cross-border capabilities. Sending a wire transfer across the globe via traditional methods typically takes 3-5 business days to settle, and it also incurs high fees.
By turning to stablecoins, entities using them can take advantage of precisely tracking their funds, near-instant settlement times, and reduced reliance on intermediaries. At the same time, this is possible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The growth of this asset class has been quite notable, as it has exploded from around $130 billion at the start of last year to over $265 billion as of today, according to data from DefiLlama.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
- Forex3 years ago
Forex Today: the dollar is gaining strength amid gloomy sentiment at the start of the Fed’s week
- Forex3 years ago
Unbiased review of Pocket Option broker
- Forex3 years ago
Dollar to pound sterling exchange rate today: Pound plummeted to its lowest since 1985
- Forex3 years ago
How is the Australian dollar doing today?
- Cryptocurrency3 years ago
What happened in the crypto market – current events today
- World3 years ago
Why are modern video games an art form?
- Commodities3 years ago
Copper continues to fall in price on expectations of lower demand in China
- Economy3 years ago
Crude oil tankers double in price due to EU anti-Russian sanctions