Connect with us
  • tg

Cryptocurrency

The next big leap for Ethereum liquid staking: The staking landscape

letizo News

Published

on

Imagine a world where everyone, regardless of their background, can easily access and participate in the revolutionary world of Ethereum. A world where decentralized applications empower individuals, and the potential for innovation knows no bounds. Against a highly equivocal and chaotic macroeconomic landscape, this is the world that the prophets of Ethereum dream of.

But little do they know this world is like an unrealized dream. Why? Let’s dig deeper.

Reflecting on the Ethereum liquid staking landscape

Centralized liquid staking protocols are at the forefront of the liquid staking revolution on Ethereum, and it shouldn’t come as a surprise. Why? Because they are highly scalable — thanks to the centralized validator set that they have. The biggest liquid staking protocol on Ethereum currently has a limited node operator set of 29 operators. It must then be a no-brainer that they hold a hegemony over the network. Any protocol claiming to be decentralized but running its operations as a business is also able to offer much higher standards of composability. While this composability that is offered to users is a feature, it can be counter-productive as well — primarily because of the systemic risks this can cause.

On the flip side, decentralized protocols do exist, but they are highly unscalable. And thus, they have a fraction of ETH staked in them compared to what is often staked via the centralized ones.

While decentralized protocols have attempted to reduce the minimum capital required to run a validator node from 32 to 8 ETH, that is still a sizeable amount for the wider ecosystem. Admittedly, this does open up opportunities for a wide number of stakers to start staking on the network, however, we contend that 8 ETH is still a sizeable amount. This reintroduces the problem of scalability, and thus a significant portion of ETH gets staked through a select group of professional node operators. This leads to the further concentration of staked ETH. The presence of these centralized node operators across different liquid staking protocols undermines the censorship resistance of the underlying network.

The inflow of ETH post-Shapella is a good indicator of users’ liquid staking preferences. One would hope that a lot of the incoming ETH would go to decentralized liquid staking; however, the figures state otherwise.

Join the community where you can transform the future. Cointelegraph Innovation Circle brings blockchain technology leaders together to connect, collaborate and publish. Apply today

Making Ethereum liquid staking scalable

One of the biggest challenges for the existing liquid staking protocols today is that they are tuned for either scalability alone or decentralization alone. The ones that are tuned for scalability alone are not decentralized, and the ones that are tuned for decentralization are not scalable. There are several examples of this — from protocols having a concentrated node operator set to those having high minimum capital requirements to run validator nodes for Ethereum.

While there have been attempts by these protocols to move towards either making their architectures scalable or decentralized, making that is quite difficult given the huge amounts of ETH that are already staked via them. Moreover, these protocol-level changes require a lot of internal deliberations (at-least for decentralized protocols) before they are rolled out.

Moreover, a core objective of any business is to make sure that they hold the hegemony over the industry to persistently retain that. This is reflected by the feigned attempts at a willingness to decentralize — but then having them falling on their head. Perhaps, there is no reason why this would happen. A centralized liquid staking protocol often operates as a business whose core objective is to compromise decentralization to achieve profitability. While I do not condemn the latter, I do feel that it comes — almost always — at the cost of decentralization.

What Ethereum needs

Ethereum prophets often call for the need to diversify staking across a multitude of protocols. And perhaps, it wouldn’t be remiss to credit those protocols that have emerged that are attempting to realize that vision. However, I must provide a caveat that any emerging protocols need strategic and critical analysis. No one would want shabby architecture being polished and presented as a resilient solution and risking the stability of Ethereum. I believe that there are two things that need immediate attention to drive growth to Ethereum liquid staking:

  • Reducing the minimum capital requirements to run a validator node: This is perhaps easier stated than executed. Reducing the minimum capital requirements incentivizes a wider spectrum of users to participate in network validation.
  • Building censorship resistance: This is perhaps common knowledge, but it often gets overlooked. With the pace at which the macroeconomic landscape is evolving, it is a dire need for protocols to integrate solutions that build the censorship resilience of the protocol. This is akin to hedging against potential future slowdowns in validator architecture and building a high-performant architecture that keeps the network secure.

Admittedly, I find myself at crossroads while writing these solutions because, while I assert that being aware of the existing challenges as well as the solutions is of paramount importance, it is not enough to persistently echo them. It is essential that we engage in extensive research and relentlessly test and build solutions that help solve these challenges and build a resilient architecture.

Mohak is the founder of ClayStack. He is an entrepreneur, investor, and a leader in the staking and liquid staking space.

Mohak is the founder of ClayStack. He is an entrepreneur, investor, and a leader in the staking and liquid staking space.

Cryptocurrency

Is Bitcoin’s Bull Market Just Getting Started? This Crucial Metric Says So (Details)

letizo News

Published

on

TL;DR

  • Although bitcoin’s price tumbled by over 20% since its January all-time high and is currently nowhere near it, a crucial metric shows that the actual cycle peak is not here yet.
  • In terms of entry prices, though, one analyst cautioned that the current levels might not be optimal.

No Peak Yet?

After hitting an all-time high on January 20 this year at over $109,000, bitcoin’s price started to lose value gradually until the end of the month and then nosedived following the global economic uncertainty prompted by US President Trump’s controversial approach.

The culmination came last week when BTC tumbled below $75,000 for the first time in five months. This meant that the asset had lost nearly $35,000 in less than three months.

This split the community into those who believe the bull market has come to a screeching halt and those who rely on history to be more optimistic, suggesting that such substantial corrections have occurred during all previous cycles. But there are only that—corrections, and BTC will persevere.

Ali Martinez, a crypto analyst with over 135,000 followers on X, brought another key metric that could support the latter. It still relies on historical performance, but it’s not focused on the technical aspects. Instead, it measures the retail activity as BTC tends to peak after a massive influx of such investors.

So far, there hasn’t been a big retail wave. This is evident from the lack of Google searches as well as the missing “retail activity through trading frequency surge.”

Martinez noted that the current cycle resembles the 2021 run when BTC peaked in April, only to break that high at the end of the year.

Don’t Rush to Buy

Although history suggests there might be more gains on the horizon for BTC, Martinez published another chart that suggests investors should maybe be more patient before allocating funds to the largest digital asset.

This is because of the Bitcoin Exchange inflow volume, a metric used to “spot strong entry points.”

This essentially confirms a previous report by Glassnode, which read that the BTC market is now in a “wait-and-see” phase.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Price Analysis: How BTC Can Escape the Current Consolidation Range

letizo News

Published

on

Bitcoin is slowly pushing higher, aiming to reclaim the 200-day moving average, but the price remains stuck below it. Considering the futures market sentiment, the next breakout or rejection could spark major volatility.

Technical Analysis

By Edris Derakhshi

The Daily Chart

As the daily chart suggests, BTC has managed to recover from the March sell-off and is now trading just below the 200 DMA, located around the $88K mark, which is acting as a strong dynamic resistance. The recent structure shows short-term higher highs and lows, but the price is still capped below the $88K level.

The buyers need a clean daily close above this zone and the 200-day moving average to open the door toward $92K and eventually, the $100K level. If the price gets rejected again, the $80K region will be key for maintaining a recovery structure.

The 4-Hour Chart

On the 4-hour timeframe, Bitcoin has broken above the long-term descending trendline and is consolidating just below the $86K–$88K supply zone. The structure shows higher highs and higher lows, indicating bullish momentum.

However, the price action has been choppy recently, with multiple rejections from the $86K area. The RSI is also gradually rising but hasn’t reached overbought yet, meaning bulls still have fuel, but they need to show conviction. A confirmed breakout above $88K could trigger a fast rally in the coming weeks.

Sentiment Analysis

By Edris Derakhshi

Open Interest

Looking at the futures market sentiment metrics, the open interest is climbing again, now sitting around $28B as the price hovers around the $85K mark. This rising OI trend suggests growing speculative activity in the derivatives market.

Historically, sharp increases in OI during sideways or slightly bullish price action often precede major volatility. If the market breaks higher, the stacked long positions could fuel a squeeze to the upside. But if resistance holds and price reverses, a long liquidation cascade is likely. Either way, the next major move will likely be amplified by this buildup in leverage.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.

Cryptocurrency charts by TradingView.

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Inside Tether’s New Ventures and Bitcoin Mining Push

letizo News

Published

on

While market volatility pressures Bitcoin mining firms to liquidate assets for survival, Tether is charting a different course.

In fact, the stablecoin giant has significantly deepened its involvement in the Bitcoin mining sector through a series of bold initiatives.

Bitcoin Mining and Beyond

According to a recent SEC filing, Tether has increased its stake in Bitcoin mining firm Bitdeer to 21%, capitalizing on a dip in the company’s stock price. The move marks a continued push into the mining industry, where traditional players are struggling amid stagnant BTC prices and waning investor confidence.

In a separate development this week, Tether announced plans to deploy its existing and future hashrate on OCEAN, a decentralized mining pool spearheaded by veteran Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr. The company intends to implement OCEAN’s DATUM Gateway across its global mining operations, in a bid to optimize low-latency connections and generate unique block templates directly at mining sites.

This initiative is particularly focused on boosting operations in underserved regions, including rural areas in Africa. The rollout not only ensures global competitiveness through technological innovation but also aligns with Tether’s growing footprint in Africa, which includes investments in both digital infrastructure and educational programs.

In a statement, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said,

“As a company committed to financial freedom and open access, we see supporting decentralization in Bitcoin mining as essential to the network’s long-term integrity. Deploying hashrate to OCEAN aligns with both our mining investments and our broader mission to fortify Bitcoin against centralizing forces.”

Tether Backs Fizen’s Blockchain Infrastructure

Alongside its efforts in Bitcoin mining, Tether also announced a strategic investment in Fizen Limited, a fintech company focused on self-custody crypto wallets and digital payment solutions.

Through this partnership, Fizen aims to strengthen its blockchain infrastructure, to allow for smoother integration of stablecoins across diverse blockchain networks. The initiative is expected to improve user experience by offering a more streamlined and inclusive way to store, transfer, and transact with stablecoins, without the barriers of complex documentation or restricted access.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Continue Reading

Trending

©2021-2024 Letizo All Rights Reserved