Aon plc (NYSE:), a leading global professional services firm, reported strong first-quarter results for 2024, with notable organic revenue growth and earnings per share (EPS) expansion. The company also announced the completion of its acquisition of NFP, a move expected to strengthen Aon’s presence in North America’s middle market.

The financial implications of the deal include a forecasted accretion to EPS by 2026 and a significant increase in free cash flow in 2025 and 2026. Aon’s CFO, Christa Davies, announced her retirement but will remain as a senior advisor until 2025.

Key Takeaways

• Aon completed the acquisition of NFP, enhancing their capabilities in the North American middle market.
• The company reported 5% organic revenue growth and 9% EPS growth in Q1 2024.
• Aon’s adjusted operating margin expanded by 100 basis points in the first quarter.
• The NFP deal is expected to be accretive to EPS in 2026, with a free cash flow increase of $300 million in 2025 and $600 million in 2026.
• Aon’s tax rate increased in Q1 2024 due to changes in income distribution and unfavorable discrete items.
• The company remains committed to its long-term 3×3 plan for growth and margin expansion.
• Aon funded the NFP acquisition with $7 billion of new debt at an average interest rate of 5.7%.
• Despite an increase in interest expense, Aon is confident in its balance sheet strength and credit ratios over the next 12 to 18 months.

Company Outlook

• Aon is focused on mid-single digit or greater organic revenue growth, adjusted operating margin expansion, and double-digit free cash flow growth over the long term.
• The company is confident in their long-term free cash flow outlook.
• Share repurchase remains the top priority for capital allocation.

Bearish Highlights

• Aon’s tax rate increased due to unfavorable discrete items and changes in the geographic distribution of income.
• The company expects credit ratios to be elevated for the next 12 to 18 months due to the new debt taken on for the NFP acquisition.
• New business in the US has seen a decline, particularly in D&O insurance and transactional business.

Bullish Highlights

• Aon is seeing strong retention and new business generation, driving organic revenue growth.
• The company reported growth opportunities in Continental Europe and Asia Pacific, as well as in sectors like energy and construction.
• Aon’s acquisition of NFP opens access to the $31 billion North American middle market, with significant growth potential.

Misses

• The company did not provide specific guidance on future tax rates.

Q&A Highlights

• Aon is leveraging new tools such as risk analyzers to enhance client value.
• The company is investing in transaction solutions to expand its client base in the corporate space.
• Aon is committed to margin expansion each year, driven by organic revenue growth and efficiencies from Aon Business Services.
• The FTC ban on non-competes could impact talent retention; however, Aon focuses on attracting and retaining talent through its culture and team environment.
• NFP’s management received Aon shares, but details of any lockup period were not disclosed.

Aon’s first-quarter performance and strategic acquisition of NFP signal a robust start to 2024. With a clear focus on growth and efficiency, Aon is poised to capitalize on new opportunities and navigate the challenges ahead. The company’s commitment to its long-term financial strategy and the integration of NFP’s capabilities underscore its determination to enhance shareholder value and reinforce its market position.

InvestingPro Insights

Aon plc (AON) has demonstrated resilience and strategic acumen with its first-quarter performance and the acquisition of NFP. As the company navigates the complexities of the market, certain metrics and InvestingPro Tips can provide deeper insights into its financial health and stock performance.

InvestingPro Data shows that Aon’s market capitalization stands at a robust 61.1 billion USD, reflecting its significant presence in the global professional services industry. Despite market fluctuations, the company maintains a solid P/E ratio of 21.9, which adjusts to 20.7 when considering the last twelve months as of Q1 2024. This valuation is underpinned by a revenue growth of 7.06% over the same period, indicating a healthy expansion in Aon’s business operations.

Two InvestingPro Tips highlight the stock’s current position and potential investor considerations. First, Aon has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years, showcasing a commitment to returning value to shareholders. Additionally, the stock is trading near its 52-week low, which might attract investors looking for a potential entry point based on historical performance.

For those interested in further analysis and tips, there are additional insights available on InvestingPro. Aon’s stock has taken a big hit over the last week, and the RSI suggests it is in oversold territory, which could be of interest to tactical investors. Moreover, analysts predict the company will be profitable this year, a sentiment supported by its profitability over the last twelve months.

To access a comprehensive set of InvestingPro Tips, visit https://www.investing.com/pro/AON. Readers can use the coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription, which includes an array of valuable tips to inform investment decisions. Currently, there are nine additional InvestingPro Tips listed for Aon, each offering unique perspectives on the company’s financial outlook and stock performance.

Full transcript – Aon Corp (AON) Q1 2024:

Operator: Good morning, and thank you for holding. Welcome to Aon plc’s First Quarter 2024 Conference Call. At this time, all parties will be in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer portion of today’s call. I would also like to remind all parties that this call is being recorded. If anyone has any objection, you may disconnect your line at this time. It is important to note that some of the comments in today’s call may constitute certain statements that are forward looking in nature as defined by the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Information concerning risk factors that could cause such differences are described in the press conference covering our first quarter 2024 results, as well as having been posted on our website. Now, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Greg Case, CEO of Aon plc.

Greg Case: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our first quarter conference call. I’m joined by Christa Davies, our CFO, and Eric Andersen, our President. For your convenience, we posted a detailed financial presentation on our website. As always, we begin by thanking our colleagues around the world for the incredible work they do every day to support each other and deliver the best of our firm to clients. And this quarter, I also want to single out one colleague in particular, our Chief Financial Officer and my friend and partner, Christa Davies. As you know, Christa announced her retirement from her role as CFO earlier this month, following over 16 years of tremendous service. With Christa’s guidance, we developed a seamless transition plan. As previously announced, Christa remains in our CFO role in the second quarter earnings and we’re making strong progress against well-defined plans to have her successor in place to begin the handoff. I’m grateful that you’ll continue to serve as a senior advisor into 2025 to ensure great continuity. Now to begin our report today, it’s important we start by highlighting an incredibly exciting milestone for our firm, the completion of our work to bring NFP into the Aon family as we closed the transaction yesterday. To the 7,700 NFP colleagues, who now join our firm, welcome to Aon. NFP’s client relationships, capabilities, focused sales force, and market knowledge provides a meaningfully expanded position in the fast-growing $31 billion North American middle market. Since our announcement late December, we’ve gotten to know the team even better and our appreciation and excitement for what we can do together has continued to grow and the opportunity is even more clear. In Commercial Risk, complementary specialist resources and expertise from both organizations will enhance what we bring to clients. Delivering Aon’s analytics and decision support tools to the NFP sales force allows for real differentiation on top of their highly-integrated sales approach. Further, we can reintroduce and introduce, reinforce NFP’s offerings with access to our programs and facilities like Aon Client Treaty, and also in Commercial Risk, we can leverage our global Aon network for clients who require seamless global service to enhance an already strong NFP value proposition. In Wealth Solutions, we see great opportunity to bring our capabilities around pension risk transfer to NFP clients, as well as to continue to build on our investment offerings together, ensuring all clients have access to retirement options that best support their people. And in Health Solutions, our businesses are highly complementary with new opportunities in the health value chain where we don’t operate today, or for clients that we only serve in one solution line. And for example, NFP brings outstanding health value proposition for clients with under 100 employees, an attractive option for our smaller clients in Commercial Risk. Conversely, we see great opportunity to provide NFP’s clients with our data and analytics solutions, including benchmarking and tools on health equity, network strategies, and high-cost claimants. Further, we can support current NFP clients with specialized capabilities in areas such as global benefits, pharmacy consulting and consumer benefits. Another great strength of NFP is their exceptional M&A engine and very strong acquisition pipeline as we look to the future. On deal financials, we’re delighted to close much earlier than originally modeled with fewer shares issued and realization of benefits that now occur a year earlier. Noting, we now expect EPS accretion to ’26 and thereafter and additional free cash flow of $300 million and $600 million in 2025 and 2026, respectively. We’re incredibly excited about the opportunity as we bring Aon and NFP content capabilities together, enabled by Aon Business Services. We also see great value in the operating model built around the principle of independent and connected to deliver Risk Capital and Human Capital capability to our clients. All in, this acquisition is another strong step forward in our Aon United journey and reinforces our long-term financial guidance to deliver mid-single digit or greater organic revenue growth, adjusted operating margin expansion and double-digit free cash flow growth over the long term. Turning now to our results in the quarter. Overall, our team delivered a strong start to the year with 5% overall organic revenue growth, 100 basis points of adjusted margin expansion and 9% EPS growth. Within our solution lines, Reinsurance delivered 7% organic revenue growth, as our team helped clients navigate continued market challenges, but with greater capacity and stable pricing on programs. Further, our team is increasingly building on traditional capabilities with enhanced data, analytics and advisory capabilities. In Health Solutions, we delivered 6% organic revenue growth with strong growth in core health across all major geographies, driven by strong ongoing new business generation and retention and strength in specialist capabilities like consumer and pharmacy benefits. In Wealth Solutions, organic revenue growth of 4% reflected strength in retirement as our teams continue to help clients reduce risk through pension risk transfer and manage the ongoing impact of regulatory changes as we continue to bring leading capabilities to help clients match risk and capital. In Commercial Risk, we saw 3% organic revenue growth, highlighted by strength in Asia and the Pacific, Continental Europe and areas in our portfolio like construction. As we look at these results, especially in the U.S., we’ve seen the impact of our business mix play out, as we have strength and strong weighting in larger clients and specialty lines like D&O. These are significant areas within our U.S. Business and again areas where we’re strong and we see substantial long-term top- and bottom-line growth potential despite some current pressure reflected in net new business. Going forward, we’ll continue to be strong in these categories and continue hiring and investment in priority areas like energy and construction. We also observed, as we’ve mentioned previously, we’re not seeing a real rebound yet in M&A and IPO activity, though we know there’s demand and dry powder building. And until yesterday, we were relatively smaller in a $31 billion North American middle market, although now with the close of NFP, we’ve added 7,700 colleagues and established a much more meaningful position in this fast-growing market. Overall, across the firm, we continue to focus on our most critical asset, our talent. Our engagement remains at historically high levels, and our voluntary attrition in Q1 is at the lowest level in many years. On talent acquisition, we continue to increase hiring in selected client-facing areas, as well as an analytics capability to support our efforts in Risk Capital and Human Capital. In summary, we’re making great progress to start the year. Our first quarter results and the close of NFP put us in a strong position to continue delivering results through 2024 and over the long term. This progress fully reinforces our 3×3 plan, focused on three fundamental commitments over the next three years, including capitalizing on our work in Risk Capital and Human Capital, delivering Aon client leadership, and amplifying these efforts through Aon Business Services. The strength, importance and momentum of this plan is being strongly reinforced by ongoing client and colleague feedback. And this plan defines a powerful path forward, one that drives ongoing top- and bottom-line growth and greater levels of long-term free cash flow growth, exactly consistent with our ongoing financial guidance. Finally, as I turn the call over to Christa, I want to return to my opening comments and thank her again for her partnership, leadership, and friendship. Ultimately, Christa will have left a permanent imprint on our Aon United strategy. For 16 years, our shared mission has been to connect our colleagues to a “one firm” mindset so they can deliver more value to clients. That mission is universally focused on accelerating Aon United, and now, in arguably our most exciting period, it’s fully reflected in our 3×3 plan, and Christa has been a critical partner in all of this work. Our Aon colleagues will miss Christa in the CFO role. Personally, the journey with Christa is a highlight of my professional career. Our 52,000 colleagues, and as of today, 60,000 and their families are in a better position because of Christa. We’re all grateful that Christa will be staying with us as a senior advisor to continue to drive momentum as she moves on to her next mission. And most important, we fully appreciate that there are other missions in life of higher priority, and we embrace Christa’s decision to shift her focus at this time. Christa, my friend, over to you.

Christa Davies: Thank you so much, Greg. I want to start by thanking you for the opportunity over the last 16 years to contribute to the incredible success we’ve had at Aon. This will be the defining role of my career, and that’s really what’s at the heart of this decision. As you described, this decision isn’t about other professional pursuits. My decision is to focus my time differently at this point in my life. I’m grateful that our work together has created the ability for me to make this choice. I must say that our 3×3 plan delivers on its full potential in the months ahead, including with the great addition of NFP. I’m going to truly miss working so closely with this team to realize the tremendous value creation that is ahead for Aon. We’re also very pleased to announce the completion of the NFP acquisition. I’m delighted to welcome the NFP to Aon. We’re excited to work together to capture the growth opportunities we see for clients, colleagues, and shareholders. As we announced yesterday, we closed the transaction for a total enterprise value of $13 billion. The faster-than-expected close date means we now expect to achieve a similar benefit a year earlier with improvements in certain metrics. Noting, we maintained guidance for revenue and cost synergies of $235 million, which now occur a year earlier given the close date. We achieved a lower interest rate on deal-related debt of 5.7%, and we issued fewer shares at 19 million. Collectively, this results in similar deal-related financial benefits of accretion and free cash flow that are realized a year earlier than initially modeled. We now expect the deal to add $300 million to free cash flow in 2025 and $600 million in 2026, and be accretive in 2026 and over the long term. We’ve also provided detailed financial information for NFP in our materials. NFP built on our long-term proven track record of strategically allocating capital at scale to high-return opportunities to create long-term value for clients, colleagues, and shareholders. And as Greg mentioned, it reinforces and accelerates our Aon United strategy and our 3×3 plan, and adds to our strong momentum as we drive results in 2024 and over the long term. Now turning to the quarter. We delivered strong operational performance to start the year, highlighted by 5% organic revenue growth, which translated into 100 basis points of adjusted operating margin expansion, 8% adjusted operating income growth, and 9% adjusted EPS growth. As Greg noted, organic revenue growth was 5%, driven by ongoing strong retention and net new business generation. I’d note that fiduciary investment income, which is not included in organic revenue growth, was $79 million. If you were to include fiduciary investment income, organic revenue growth would have been 70 basis points higher. We continue to expect mid-single digit or greater organic revenue growth for the full year 2024 and over the long term. And as we look forward, we continue to expect that NFP will contribute to the firm’s overall revenue growth through organic revenue growth, including $175 million of net revenue synergies by 2026 and inorganic growth from ongoing M&A. Moving to operating performance. We delivered strong operational improvement in Q1 with adjusted operating margins of 39.7%, an increase of 100 basis points, driven by revenue growth, portfolio mix shift, efficiencies from Aon Business Services, and restructuring savings, overcoming expense growth, including investments in colleagues and technology, to drive long-term growth. Restructuring savings in Q1 were $20 million and contributed 50 basis points to adjusted operating margin expansion. Restructuring actions completed so far are expected to generate $90 million of savings in 2024, and we expect restructuring savings will fall to the bottom-line. At this time, we continue to expect $100 million of realized savings in 2024 as we continue to execute against our plans for Aon Business Services and our business. Regarding the program, we are seeing real progress in our acceleration of Aon Business Services. This includes streamlining and improving operational processes around working capital, moving work to the best locations, and enhancing clients’ and colleagues’ experience with great new tools such as our property, casualty, D&O, and cyber analyzers. As we’ve said previously, we know delivering our Aon Business Services strategy will result in long-term top- and bottom-line growth as we drive more value for clients, colleagues, and shareholders. As we think about adjusted operating margins going forward, we continue to expect to drive margin expansion over the long term through ongoing revenue growth and portfolio mix shift to higher growth, higher margin areas of the portfolio, driven by efficiencies from Aon Business Services. Now that we’ve closed NFP, margins will be initially lower. Considering the close timing, we think the right baseline from which to measure 2024 adjusted operating margin growth is 30.6%, calculated as our 31.6% in 2023, less a 100 basis point drag from NFP for the period from April 25th close through the end of 2024. In our materials, we’ve detailed 2023 operating performance for NFP. On a full year basis, we would note that NFP would have had a full year pro forma drag of a 140 basis points for 2023, so there’ll be some ongoing drag on 2025 margins until we lap the close in April 2025. We also expect fiduciary investment income to be relatively flat year-over-year based on current interest rate expectations. So, the tailwind that we’ve seen in Q1 this year will be reduced, although we remain committed to driving full year adjusted operating margin expansion in 2024 against this adjusted baseline of 30.6% and over the long term. Turning to EPS, adjusted EPS grew 9% in the quarter, reflecting 8% adjusted operating income growth and ongoing share buyback, partially offset by a higher tax rate in the quarter. With respect to NFP, as we previously communicated, we expect the acquisition to be dilutive to adjusted EPS in the remainder of 2024, breakeven in 2025, and accretive to adjusted EPS in 2026 and beyond. Turning to free cash flow. I’d note Q1 has historically been our seasonally smallest quarter from a cash flow standpoint due primarily to incentive compensation payments. And as we’ve communicated before, free cash flow can be lumpy quarter to quarter. We generated $261 million of free cash flow in the first quarter, reflecting strong operating income growth and lower CapEx, offset by higher receivables, payments related to E&O, restructuring, NFP transaction integration charges, and higher cash tax payments, as we’ve previously communicated. As we look forward, we expect ongoing negative impacts of free cash flow in the near term from restructuring, higher interest expense, and NFP deal and integration costs. The NFP acquisition strengthens our long-term free cash flow outlook with $300 million of incremental free cash flow in 2025 and $600 million in 2026. Over the long term, we would expect to return to our trajectory of double-digit free cash flow growth, driven by operating income growth and a $500 million opportunity in working capital. Now turning to capital allocation. We allocate capital based on return on capital and a long-term value creation, which we’ve done over time through core business investment, share buyback, and M&A. Regarding M&A, as you look historically, we have a successful track record of balancing acquisitions, divestitures, and share buyback as we continue to optimize our portfolio against our priority investment areas on an ROIC basis. We’re incredibly excited about NFP’s impressive M&A engine, noting their strong history of M&A. We look forward to building on their established track record and executing against their strong pipeline to drive future growth in this space within our ROIC framework. We still expect share buyback to remain the top priority for capital allocation. As we think about capital allocation in 2024, we’d observe there are puts and takes around free cash flow that we’ve communicated. And while buyback will be lower than last year, we expect it will still be substantial at $1 billion or more based on our current M&A expectations for the rest of the year. We have a very strong long-term free cash flow outlook for the firm and are confident that share repurchase will continue to remain our highest ROIC opportunity for meaningful ongoing capital allocation over time. Turning now to our balance sheet and debt capacity. We remain confident in the strength of our balance sheet. As previously communicated, we funded the cash and assumed liabilities portion of the NFP purchase with approximately $7 billion of new debt, with $5 billion raised in March 2024, and $2 billion borrowed at close. And I’d note, the average interest rate for the $5 billion of transaction related senior notes and the $2 billion term loan is 5.7%, about 80 basis points better than what we modeled when we announced the deal. We expect our credit ratios to be elevated over the next 12 to 18 months as we bring our leverage ratios back in line with levels consistent with our credit profile, 2.8 times to 3 times debt to EBITDA on a GAAP basis. This is driven by substantial free cash flow generation and incremental debt capacity from EBITDA growth, noting our track record of effectively managing leverage within current ratings. In summary, our operating performance in Q1 is a strong start to the year, and we’re well positioned to build on this momentum in the rest of the year. We’re delighted to have closed NFP acquisition ahead of schedule, enabling us to achieve financial benefits of accretion and free cash flow a year earlier than initially modeled. We look forward to enhancing NFP’s strong client relationships with Aon’s content and capabilities and see real opportunity to learn from each other and bring better solutions to our clients together. It’s another step forward in our 3×3 plan as we accelerate our Aon United strategy, catalyzed by Aon Business Services and reinforced by the restructuring program. With that, I’ll turn the call back to the operator, and we’d be delighted to take your questions.

Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Andrew Kligerman with TD Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Andrew Kligerman: Thank you. Good morning, and congratulations, Christa. Greg, you mentioned in the opening remarks the lowest attrition that Aon has seen in a while. Could you put any details around that? Any color? It sounds very interesting.

Greg Case: Well, Andrew, I appreciate the question. Listen, if you step back and think about sort of talent overall and what we’re about and what we’re up to, this is really about how we’ve built on Aon United and the strategy around the culture, and it’s been foundational, how we connect our colleagues, support each other, and deliver the best we can for our clients. And that has just continued to build, and it really gives them an opportunity to sit across the table to do some pretty unique things with clients, which is why they’re here, why they’re excited about being part of our firm. And then on top of that now, we’ve got the 3×3 plan, Andrew, which literally is going to continue to enhance this very substantially with greater content and capability in Risk Capital and Human Capital, as well as the analytics that underpin all that driven by ABS. So, for all those reasons, this is a pretty unique place to be at a time when clients have high need. But, Eric, what else would you add to that?

Eric Andersen: Yeah. Greg, maybe I’ll just take it down. If you’re an account leader or a colleague working with a client, just picking up on your example, culture capabilities, team support, all those drive a decision to either come or stay at our firm. And if you just think about it, historically, if you were part of a client team, you were having a product discussion with a client. Today, you’re having — if it’s a risk client, you’re having a risk capital discussion. So, you’re having colleagues from commercial risk, from [re] (ph), maybe captives, maybe risk consulting, using new tools, like, at the risk analyzers that Christa mentioned, that are created with our ABS colleagues. It creates a professional development for them, and it creates a team-based environment where you’re actually providing real new value to clients. So, I think all of that drives why people come and then ultimately why they stay with us.

Andrew Kligerman: Awesome. And then just shifting over to the tax rate, around 23% this quarter, it’s a bit surprising just given that over the last several years, it’s kind of hovered around 18.5%. And I know Christa doesn’t give guidance on this, but maybe given the big move in the tax rate and your points in the write up about changing geography, you could give us a little color on, A, the change in geography of the tax? And B, maybe an exception and an indication of where we might expect the tax rate to be going forward, especially with NFP there?

Christa Davies: Thanks so much for the question, Andrew. And we did see a higher tax rate this quarter, driven by, as you said, changes in the geographic distribution of income and unfavorable discretes. And I will note, Andrew, that discretes have historically been positive for us, and in this quarter, they really did just line up to be net negative. And what I would say is, look, it’s just lumpy to quarter to quarter. And, as you said, we don’t give guidance going forward. But if we look back historically, exclusive of the impacts of discretes, which can be positive or negative, our historical underlying rate for the last five years has been 18%.

Andrew Kligerman: Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator: Our next question is from Jimmy Bhullar with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Jimmy Bhullar: Good morning. So, first just had a question on organic growth in Commercial Risk. If we look over the past year, year-and-a-half or so, it seems to have lagged what we’ve seen at some of your peers. And initially, I think a lot of people were concerned that this was because of the fallout from Willis. You’ve highlighted, the capital markets activity pressuring your results more than peers as well. But wondering if you could just talk about why you feel your growth has lagged some of your large peers even though historically you’ve actually been fairly consistent with growth with most of the other competitors?

Greg Case: Jimmy, really appreciate the question. And maybe what I’ll do is I’ll step back and just again orient overall for global Aon, how we think about the firm and how we think about progress over time. And if you step back, we’d essentially say, first of all, this is not about one quarter, it really is about as you look across over the year, kind of how we’re performing across global Aon over the course of the year. And our mission right now, which we’re going to continue to push on and really amplify is to build on the 3×3 plan over the next three years. And this is really capitalizing on Risk Capital and Human Capital, amplifying through Aon Business Services and delivering Aon client leadership, which we know, Jimmy, is going to together deliver both top-line and bottom-line performance and most important the double-digit annual free cash flow growth compared to our ’23 baseline that Christa described. And if you think about the quarter, which you’re coming back to now asking specifically, I’m going to get to Commercial Risk very explicitly in a second, but our goals in the quarter from our standpoint were actually accelerated in terms of that 3×3 plan. If you think about ABS, the introduction of our analyzers and the client experience improvements, client response has been exceptional and real progress in the quarter. Our restructuring plan, as Christa highlighted, strengthens really what we’ve done in ABS substantially and it really supports substantial hiring in priority areas. So, all good from a priority standpoint, and obviously, of course, the announcement of NFP with truly game-changer access into the North American middle market, and really every — think about all aspects or generally aspects of the close improved since our December 20th announcement. So, if we step back, Jimmy, and you sort of say, how are we doing from our standpoint, we feel very good, especially about the 3×3 plan and the progress we made on it. And if you think about the quarter overall for Aon, we delivered mid-single digit growth 5% with strength in Health and Reinsurance in Continental Europe and Asia and the Pacific, margin expansion of 100 basis points, EPS growth of 9% and free cash flow exactly in line with expectations. And then specifically to your question, because I want to make sure I get to that, look, we saw strength in Commercial across Continental Europe, Asia and Pacific, all very good. We highlighted the mix play, as we think about where we really have large portions of our business weighted to our larger clients, especially in some of the specialty lines like D&O and there’s some pressure there, but we also observed, obviously as we just described, we were very underweight in the fast-growing middle market until yesterday. And now we see a massive opportunity going forward. They’re all consistent with the 3×3 plan. And we’ve communicated previously the negative impact on transaction and IPO activity, which is yet to rebound, but we are very confident it will. So, from our standpoint, look, we feel very good about the trajectory and what we’re going to be able to do over time and deliver on the 3×3 plan in a very clear way. And it’s going to be great outcome for clients, great outcome for our colleagues who would deliver that value and ultimately for our shareholders. And I just want to reiterate as what Christa described, we’re at mid-single digit organic growth or greater and that commitment holds across ’24 and over the long term. And we fully expect to translate that into frankly strong top-line and bottom-line performance.

Jimmy Bhullar: Okay, thanks. And then just following up on buybacks, I’m assuming this year is going to be lower than last year partly because of the drag because of NFP then also the drag because of the restructuring program. But if we think about 1Q, was it also depressed because of the seasonality of cash flows or is this sort of a normal quarter in terms of buyback?

Christa Davies: Yeah. So, Jimmy, thank you for the question. And I did actually give specific guidance in my opening remarks about buyback because I recognize that there’s a lot of puts and takes around free cash flow as we’ve communicated. And while buyback will be lower than last year, we expect it will be — still be substantial for the full year 2024 at $1 billion or more based on our current M&A expectations for the rest of the year. And as we mentioned, Q1 is our seasonally smallest free cash flow quarter.

Jimmy Bhullar: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question is from Mike Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Mike Zaremski: Hey, good morning. Congrats, Christa. On the NFP deal closing, is there anything we should be aware of in terms of the shares Aon will be issuing to the owners of NFP and whether there’s like a lockup or expected sale of those shares over time given how a large amount it is?

Christa Davies: Thanks so much for the question. And we did issue the 19 million shares yesterday, so that occurred. And we haven’t disclosed anything related to the MDP lockup. What we can say is, the NFP management team did receive a meaningful amount of Aon shares, and the purchase agreement refers to their lockup period. And we have spent time with our new investors, and they’re really excited about the Aon story and appreciate how the acquisition furthers our Aon United strategy, and I’m particularly excited about the 3×3 plan, too.

Mike Zaremski: Okay. Got it. My follow-up is also on the NFP deal. Now that it’s closed, the math you gave when the deal was announced on the interest expense appeared to bake in a slightly higher interest rate level in our — it looks like than current interest rates. And just given cost of capital, it’s actually even a bit higher today. Would this also kind of incentivize Aon to pay down the debt faster as well than you had thought maybe a few months ago when the deal was announced? Thanks.

Christa Davies: Thanks so much for the question, Mike. And so, if you look at the financials we’ve outlined, the synergies and deal financials, what you’ll observe with the interest expense is, when we originally announced this in December, we had $230 million of interest expense in the stub period, which at the time was a six-month stub period, and we now have $285 million in that period, and it’s really a result of the two extra months. Interest is actually at a lower average interest rate. We had originally forecast the average interest rate on the $7 billion of debt to be 6.5%. It’s now 5.7%, so a whole 80 basis points less. So, the interest rate is less, but you’ve got two more months. And then, you can see that the interest expense in the future years, 2025 and 2026, is coming down from our original estimate. So, the $310 million we now have in 2025 compares to the $410 million we had before, and the $275 million compares to the $340 million. So, you can see how the lower interest rates are impacted those future years.

Mike Zaremski: Okay. Got it. I’ll look at that. Thank you.

Operator: Our next question is from Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Elyse Greenspan: Hi. Thanks. Good morning. My first question, I was hoping to get more color just on why the new business was down year-over-year in the U.S. specifically versus other regions. And, Greg, I know you called out some business lines, but can you just help us think about how that might rebound from here?

Greg Case: I appreciate the question, Elyse. Start, overall globally, very strong profile across the board as we said before both on retention, exceptionally high, and on new business overall. All we just did is highlight a couple areas in the U.S. where we’re seeing some pressure, and that’s really what we’re showing up. That that will rebound over time, as we continue to talk to clients about the opportunities they’ve got to read as they think about their overall programs in terms of where they are. But, Eric, anything you’d add to that perspective?

Eric Andersen: Yeah. Greg, I mean, you talked about D&O in particular, but I would also say we’ve had some really solid growth in areas like energy and construction and other places where we’re investing in talent to grow our capabilities there. That’s the sector piece. But we’re also investing in geographic areas called Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, where we’re also seeing good growth. So, I think we will see great opportunity for us as we go forward through the year.

Elyse Greenspan: And then, in terms of the transactional, the M&A and the SPAC and the IPO business, I guess, how would the Q1 compare, right? That’s been a business that’s been a headwind for you guys right over the last six, seven quarters. How would — have you started to see any of that business come back, or would you still say we’re close to trough levels there?

Eric Andersen: So, Elyse, I don’t think there’s anybody on the planet that looks at it closer than us as we’ve been watching it. We hear people talk of green shoots, but the reality is, and I think we’ve said it on the past, that our opportunity happens when the deals close. And so, at this point, you hear things in the market about dry powder and people wanting to do transactions, but at this point, it’s still fairly depressed.

Greg Case: I think we would say, Elyse, as Eric described, we see the pipeline, we love it. It looks very strong, but we don’t count it anymore. We count it when it’s done, and that’s what we’re going to do. When we see the opportunity, we’re going to count it when it’s done.

Elyse Greenspan: And then, one on the margin side. You gave the baseline, Christa, of 30.6% for this year. I know in the past, you’ll typically point to your historical kind of 80 basis points to 90 basis points of margin improvement annually. Is that the right way to think about the improvement off of the 36% given the puts and takes of fiduciary investment income savings and then just leverage against your revenue growth?

Christa Davies: So, Elyse, the 30.6% is absolutely the right starting point for 2024 margin expansion. We don’t give specific guidance. What we do say is we’re committed to margin expansion each and every year, including 2024 of that 30.6% margin base, but all the drivers still hold. We’re driving margin expansion due to organic revenue growth, portfolio mix shift, and synergies and efficiencies from Aon Business Services.

Elyse Greenspan: Thank you.

Operator: Our next question is from David Motemaden with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

David Motemaden: Hi, thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to hear your guys’ opinion on the potential FTC ban of non-competes and what sort of impact that might have on your business and specifically on the acquisition economics of NFP.

Greg Case: I’ll start overall. First, Dave, appreciate the question. It’s not something we generally enter into, particularly in the U.S., where obviously this is going to focus on. But the macro point is really the talent question I think you’re really getting at, which is fundamental. Maybe Eric can offer some thoughts on that. This is a place we live every day. It’s our focus.

Eric Andersen: Yeah. And I think, whether it’s the attrition numbers, which are historically low, whether it’s our ability to attract talent into the firm, we talked a little bit before about all the different tools that we’ve been investing in, and the culture and the team environment is all very important to keep the people. So, as Greg said, we don’t normally enter into non-compete, so this isn’t a big issue for us, but it’s all the other factors that drive it. And I think you also asked a question about NFP and the colleagues there. And I would just say that — and both Greg and Christa mentioned it in the written remarks about how excited we are to have them. I think the opportunity for us to work together to add more value to their clients, which ultimately adds more value to their colleagues who have more capabilities and more opportunities to do more with them with our content. And then, obviously, the scale that we get from ABS, whether it’s efficiency or the ability to deliver insights and tools and all the different aspects across health and risk, I think, provide great opportunity for the NFP colleagues as they join the firm. So, really excited about that as I know everybody has been saying, and we see great opportunity going forward.

David Motemaden: Got it. Great. Thanks. That’s helpful. And then just my second question, it looks like U.S. organic growth within CRS was down in the first quarter compared to being flat in the fourth quarter. I’m just wondering, was there anything that got incrementally worse in the first quarter versus the fourth quarter? It feels like the pressures were kind of all kind of consistent. So, I’m just wondering what that incremental — what’s driving that incremental decline, if I look at the organic growth in first quarter versus 4Q?

Greg Case: We appreciate it, David. From our standpoint, we’re not really looking Q4 to Q1 over time. Again, this is kind of an overall annual approach in terms of how we think about it. And as we said before, nothing has changed committed to mid-single digit or greater over the course of the year for our firm, and fully on track to do that across our firm. So, I wouldn’t look for anything in particular. We highlighted a few areas because we wanted to call them out. But listen, this is client leadership at a time when we’re doubling down and investing on more client leadership. This is Risk Capital and Human Capital. This is Aon Business Services with the analyzers. And as we’ve launched those, they have met with hugely positive client feedback and the colleague feedback in terms of what they need, as well as ABS, which really enables all that, amplifies it, and creates a client experience environment that’s better than ever before and on top of the content. So, for us, no, we feel very good about the progress in Q1 and what it means for our trajectory going forward.

David Motemaden: Understood. Thanks so much.

Operator: Our next question is from Rob Cox with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Rob Cox: Hey, thanks. I think in the previous presentation on NFP, the target was for sort of similar to historical levels of total revenue growth, I think about 14%. Are you guys still — is that projection sort of maintained here? And are you still confident in that projection, considering there could be some slowing levels of inflation or caution around the economy going forward?

Greg Case: Rob, maybe I’ll just take a quick step back. I think it’s worthwhile just reflecting on sort of the whole NFP process and getting Eric to comment on this specifically in terms of sort of once we see the opportunity. Look, we just feel great about this combination. This is the $31 billion North American market in which we’re vastly underway. We have an opportunity because of ABS to really go after that market in a way that’s not just making us more sizable, but we think better. And better is this idea of really independent and connected in the way Eric described before, and I wanted to talk a bit about that. All these things sort of, as we’ve spent time over the last few months with Doug and Mike and the team, have been substantially reinforced. And so this is, at the top-line level on revenue opportunities in terms of how we do it and the yield we get out of that, all these things are better. And then, we reflect kind of some of the deal economics that also are better. So, from our standpoint, we just see huge momentum. But Eric, you’ve been living this with Doug and Mike and the team. Maybe comment a little bit here and address some of Rob’s questions more specifically.

Eric Andersen: Yeah. I think there’s two components. And first, just to touch on the independent and connected piece, which is such a critical part of how both the NFP team and the Aon team have been approaching this. And the independent piece is really to respect and sort of celebrate the way NFP approaches its clients locally and how the team service those clients. So, really focusing in to make sure that those teams know exactly what they were doing before is what they’re going to continue to do. The connected part is really about two pieces. There’s an efficiency play with our ABS platform around tech and ops and areas where we can get some cost synergy. But, also, more importantly, I think it’s how we connect around product and capability. How we can bring our thought leadership, how we can bring structured portfolio solutions and product capability and thought leadership and get it to those to those teams in a way that their clients can digest it. So, I think how we connect is really about content, and it’s a little bit about the cost synergies, but it’s really a revenue play for us as we look at the middle market. And I think on the growth number, there’s an organic play here that we’re talking a lot about. There’s also an inorganic play that, as Greg mentioned in his opening remarks, their M&A pipeline and the way they approach adding organizations to NFP is really one of the strengths of the firm and something we’re going to continue to work with.

Greg Case: And just to amplify one more piece, this is a tour de force revenue opportunity, right? That’s been the focus since the jump and that’s what we’ve seen for the last few months. And it’s both ways. Incredible capability. We hope to be able to bring with a producer who can sit across the table and do more on behalf of a client, which they just — they’re phenomenal at they love. But also on our side, we’re going to benefit tremendously too as they — in the ways they approach the market and how they can help Aon. It’s just a — we had high expectations going into the conversations, they’ve been exceeded over the last few months as we come together. So, while we’re not giving specific guidance on the growth number, this is tour de force growth and, man, do we see a great opportunity here to access this very, very substantial market where we’re underway, but do so in a way again, it’s not just bigger, but candidly better.

Rob Cox: Great. Appreciate the color. And then maybe as a follow-up, on transaction solutions, I think you guys have talked about doubling down on transaction solutions in the past. Could you talk about exactly what that means? And have you added talent there recently and expanded your practice, basically, anticipation of a rebound in M&A?

Eric Andersen: So, I would answer it in two ways. I think when we’ve talked about doubling down on it, the history of that product has historically been a PE-backed business. They were the original users of reps and warranties and tax insurance and things like that. Moving that over into the corporate space, where it’s corporate to corporate, has been an area that we’ve been investing and understanding among our client leaders as well as the subject matter experts that know that space. So, we’ve held the team. That was the goal, and I think that’s what we’ve been saying for the last two years and the slowdown, knowing that at some stage, the market will come back. And we wanted to make sure the industry-leading expertise stayed with Aon. And so, we continue to use them to reinforce the existing relationships that they have, while also building out a broader potential client set as M&A comes back.

Rob Cox: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our final question comes from Meyer Shields with KBW. Please proceed with your question.

Meyer Shields: Great. Thanks. Good morning. And Christa, congratulations. One question on the first quarter margin. I guess if we take out fiduciary investment income in the savings, it doesn’t seem — and compare that to the same issue last year, it doesn’t seem like there’s been a lot of margin expansion despite the 5% organic growth. And I was hoping you could walk us through why that would be the case.

Christa Davies: Yeah. So, Meyer, the way we think about margins is total margins. I know you’re passing it into different components, and I understand the math. But we are — we think about gross margins, which are substantial, and then we reinvest to deliver net margin expansion each year, which we will deliver again in 2024. And that’s driven by organic revenue growth, portfolio mix shift, restructuring savings, which as you pointed, will drop to the bottom-line, and efficiencies from Aon Business Services. And so, we continue to invest in technology and Aon Business Services to drive future innovation and growth with clients.

Meyer Shields: Okay. No, that’s fair. Makes sense that gets modeled in. For reporting purposes, is NFP’s organic growth going to be included in the organic growth number that you report on a consolidated basis?

Christa Davies: Yes. It is. And so that’s why we’ve broken out in the numbers, Meyer. The revenue from NFP in that table, of 2023, by quarter, by solution line, so you can add it in. And so, the way you do that for revenue is you add two months of Q2 of NFP plus the three months of Aon as your starting point for 2023, and then you grow that. And you will see the NFP numbers come through on that M&A table in our organic table.

Meyer Shields: Okay. Perfect. Thanks so much.

Operator: Thank you. I would now like to turn the call back over to Greg Case for closing remarks.

Greg Case: I don’t have a lot, but I have one message I want to deliver on behalf of Eric and Christa and I. We just want to say, on this very historic day for NFP and for Aon, a huge heartfelt welcome to our 7,700 new colleagues. We’re just truly, truly excited to partner with you as we begin this journey together. So, we’re really looking forward to it, and welcome. Thanks everybody for joining and look forward to our next call. Take care.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE:) has reported a strong start to 2024 with first-quarter results surpassing expectations. The company saw a substantial 35% growth in consolidated revenue and significant gains in both operating margins and earnings per share. A strategic move to refinance debt has also placed Tutor Perini in a favorable financial position, with a reduced total debt and a robust backlog that promises continued growth. The management remains optimistic about resolving legacy disputes, which is expected to further strengthen the company’s cash position in the near term.

Key Takeaways

• Tutor Perini Corporation reported a 35% increase in consolidated revenue for the first quarter of 2024.
• Operating margins stood at 15% for the Civil segment and 3.9% for the Building segment.
• Diluted earnings per share were $0.30, with net income reaching $16 million.
• The company successfully issued $400 million in new senior notes and redeemed $500 million of senior notes due in 2025.
• Backlog grew by 26% year-over-year, reaching $10 billion.
• Tutor Perini maintains its 2024 earnings per share guidance of $0.85 to $1.10.

Company Outlook

• Tutor Perini expects substantial growth in backlog in the coming years.
• The company plans to resolve most of its remaining legacy disputes and collect associated cash in 2024 and 2025.
• Anticipates double-digit revenue growth and a return to positive earnings in 2024, with stronger earnings expected in 2025 and 2026.

Bearish Highlights

• Corporate G&A expenses increased due to higher compensation-related expenses.
• Other income decreased slightly.

Bullish Highlights

• Specialty Contractors segment performance improved and is expected to be profitable by the end of 2024.
• Interest expenses decreased due to prepayment on a term loan.
• Total debt reduced to $801 million as of March 31, 2024.

Misses

• The company shed unfavorable legacy projects in their specialty segment, resulting in lower revenue.

Q&A Highlights

• Tutor Perini aims to reduce BIE to around $400 million by the end of 2025.
• The company is focused on resolving disputes amicably without litigation, which could take six months to a year.
• Tutor Perini has changed contracts to receive mobilization payments upfront, maintaining this at around 15% of revenue.
• The Brooklyn jail project’s billing only includes the design portion in BIE.

Tutor Perini Corporation’s first-quarter performance indicates a strong upward trajectory for the company. Despite increased expenses related to compensation and a slight decrease in other income, the company’s strategic financial maneuvers, including debt refinancing and a focus on amicable dispute resolution, have positioned it well for future growth. Investors and stakeholders can find encouragement in the company’s maintained EPS guidance and the expected profitability of the Specialty Contractors segment by year’s end. As Tutor Perini continues to streamline its operations and capitalize on its growing backlog, the outlook for 2024 and beyond appears promising.

InvestingPro Insights

Tutor Perini Corporation’s robust first-quarter performance in 2024 is further illuminated by real-time data and InvestingPro Tips that highlight key financial metrics and stock behavior. As the company navigates through its strategic initiatives, these insights provide a deeper understanding of its financial health and market position.

InvestingPro Data:

• Market Cap (Adjusted): $930.14M USD, reflecting the company’s current valuation in the market.

• Revenue Growth (Quarterly): An impressive 35.13% for Q1 2024, aligning with the reported increase in consolidated revenue.

• 1 Year Price Total Return: A staggering 235.47%, showcasing the stock’s strong performance over the past year.

InvestingPro Tips:

1. Net income is expected to grow this year, which supports the company’s optimistic outlook and plans for resolving legacy disputes.

2. The stock has experienced a significant return over the last week, with a 31.51% price total return, indicating a positive market reaction to recent developments.

For investors looking to delve deeper into Tutor Perini’s financials and stock performance, InvestingPro offers additional insights and tips. By subscribing to InvestingPro, users can gain access to an extensive array of analytics and data to inform their investment decisions. Use coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription, and explore the 16 additional InvestingPro Tips available for Tutor Perini at https://www.investing.com/pro/TPC.

Full transcript – Tutor Perini Corp (TPC) Q1 2024:

Operator: Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Tutor Perini Corporation First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Maria, and I’ll be your coordinator for today. All participants are currently in a listen-only mode. Following management’s prepared remarks, we will be opening the call for a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the conference over to your host for today, Mr. Jorge Casado, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Jorge Casado: Hello, everyone. And thank you for your interest and participation. With us today are Ronald Tutor, Chairman and CEO; Gary Smalley, President; and Ryan Soroka, Senior Vice President and CFO. Before we discuss our results, I will remind everyone that during today’s call, we will be making forward-looking statements which are based on management’s current assessment of existing trends and information. There is an inherent risk that our actual results could differ materially. You can find our disclosures about risk factors that could potentially contribute to such differences in our Form 10-K, which we filed on February 28, 2024, and in the Form 10-Q that we are filing today. The company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether due to new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law. Thank you. And I will now turn the call over to Ronald Tutor.

Ronald Tutor: Thanks, Jorge. Good day and thank you for joining us. We delivered a very good first quarter result that exceeded our expectations and demonstrates that we are on track for double-digit revenue growth and a return to profitability in 2024, just as we had indicated on our earnings call last quarter. Our first quarter results featured 35% consolidated revenue growth, strong profitability with operating margins of 15% and 3.9% for our Civil and Building segments, respectively, and $0.30 of diluted earnings per share, which was especially strong given the typical seasonality of our business. Backlog grew 26% year-over-year and continues to be very healthy at $10 billion and, perhaps most impressively, very strong operating cash flow of $98 million for the quarter, the second highest operating cash flow result of any first quarter since the 2008 merger between Tutor-Saliba and Perini Corp. Ryan will discuss all the financial details a bit later. Importantly, as previously announced, we recently completed a successful debt refinancing, which strengthened our balance sheet and will extend our debt maturities. We issued $400 million of new senior notes due in 2029, which, combined with $100 million of available cash on hand to reduce the prior note, they will be used to redeem the $500 million of senior notes due in 2025. In conjunction with our refinancing, we also amended our credit agreement, which will become effective upon the redemption of our existing senior notes, extending the maturity of our revolving credit facility by approximately two years. After we redeem our existing senior notes next week, we will have reduced our total debt by nearly $200 million since the end of last year and even more including the fourth quarter of 2023. The continued reduction of debt will be our focus with the strong cash flow expected during the rest of 2024 and even 2025. We continue to make good progress on resolving various disputed matters in the first quarter, which contributed about half of the outstanding operating cash that we generated. We still expect to resolve most of the remaining legacy disputes and collect substantial amounts of associated cash this year, with a lesser amount of resolves expected to be finalized in 2025. The dispute resolution activity is expected to help drive operating cash flow for both 2024 and 2025, and we expect them to be as strong as 2023’s record cash performance. As I mentioned, our first quarter backlog was $10 billion, up a solid 26% year-over-year. The most significant new awards and contract adjustments in the first quarter include a $243 million healthcare project in California, the $73 million project — Titan Hangar 3 project in Florida, $66 million of additional funding for several healthcare projects in California, $55 million for three U.S. Navy projects in Diego Garcia for Black Construction, and $52 million of additional funding for three mass transit projects in California. We still anticipate that our backlog will grow significantly later this year and in 2025, as we bid and win our share of the major volume of available project opportunities we have discussed in recent quarters, which are supported by the bipartisan infrastructure bill, as well as strong state and local funding. Our most significant near-term prospects include the $550 million Raritan Bridge we were low bidder on previously, which is now rebidding in the next 60 days; the $6 billion dry dock project, the naval shipyard in the State of Washington, which I believe is going to be broken up into four to six projects less in magnitude, but able to be bid on separately; the multibillion dollar Manhattan jail facility; the $2 billion Honolulu rail transit project, for which we had bid again previously the low bidder to be rejected over lack of funding; the $1.8 billion South Jersey light rail Camden line in New Jersey; the $1.5 billion Newark AirTrain Replacement Project, again, another project we were previously low bidder that the owner was unable to award due to budget constraints. That project is now bidding in August. The $1.2 billion Inglewood Transit connector project in Southern California bidding in June. The $800 million Kensico east view connection tunnel in New York, which is expected to bid by the end of June and the $500 million and $750 million Palisades and Manhattan tunnels in New Jersey and New York bidding this summer. We anticipate positive earnings for 2024, again, with significantly stronger earnings expected in 2025 and 2026. Based on our results to date this year, our assessment of the current market and business outlook, and to maintain adequate contingency in the event of unforeseen events, we are affirming our 2024 EPS guidance and still expect EPS to be in the range of $0.85 to $1.10. As in prior years, our earnings are expected to be weighted more heavily in the second half of the year due to the anticipated timing of large project activities as well as typical seasonality. Thank you. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Ryan to view the financial results.

Ryan Soroka: Thank you, Ron. Good afternoon everyone. As Ron mentioned, we’re off to a great start in 2024 with excellent first quarter results that exceeded our expectations. Our ongoing focus on dispute resolutions and cash generation helped us to achieve very strong operating cash flow of $98.3 million in the first quarter, the second highest first quarter result we have had since 2008. Approximately $50 million of this cash was associated with collections related to settlements and other dispute resolutions, and these resolutions collectively resulted in essentially no impact to earnings in the first quarter. We expect strong cash flows will continue to be enhanced this year and next year by the anticipated resolutions of various remaining disputes, and beyond that, our cash generation should remain solid, driven by increased project execution activities. I’m pleased with our recently completed debt refinancing, which strengthened our balance sheet and will extend our debt maturities by enabling us to redeem $500 million of existing senior notes due in 2025 and replace them with $400 million of new senior notes due in 2029, and $100 million of cash that we’ve been accumulating. We also amended our credit agreement. And upon the upcoming redemption of our existing senior notes next week, the maturity of our revolving credit facility will be extended to 2027. It’s also worth noting our new senior notes have two years of call protection. As Ron indicated, our near term focus will remain on reducing debt by paying down and eventually paying off our term loan B, which we are not restricted to prepaying. Now let’s discuss our P&L results. Revenue for the first quarter of 2024 was $1.05 billion, up 35% compared to $776 million for the same quarter last year. The strong growth was primarily driven by increased activities on the California High-Speed Rail project, the Brooklyn Jail project in New York and the LAX Airport Metro Connector Project in California. Civil segment revenue for the first quarter of 2024 was $472 million, up 35% compared to the first quarter last year, primarily due to some of the factors I just mentioned, as well as increased activities on Frontier-Kemper’s Eagle Mountain gas pipeline project in British Columbia. Building segment revenue was $412 million, up 79% year-over-year, also driven by certain aforementioned factors and increased activities on a healthcare project in California. The strong growth we had in the Civil and Building segment was partially offset by a 16% decline in the Specialty Contractors segment, with the specialty segment reporting revenue of $165 million for the first quarter of 2024. The segment’s revenue decline was mainly due to reduced activities on an industrial facility project in Arizona and the electrical and mechanical components of a completed transportation project in the northeast. Income from construction operations was $49 million for the first quarter of 2024 compared to an $82 million loss for the same quarter last year. The significant improvement was largely due to the absence of certain prior-year unfavorable adjustments, as well as contributions related to the increased activities I mentioned on certain Civil and Building segment projects. We had a couple of product adjustments that largely offset each other in the first quarter of 2024, but impacted margins for the Civil and Specialty Contractors segment, a favorable adjustment of $10 million on a Civil segment mass transit project in California related to a dispute resolution and associated expected cost savings, and an unfavorable adjustment of $12 million on a completed Specialty Contractors segment project in New York due to an arbitration ruling that provided us with only a partial award. Civil segment income from construction operations for the first quarter of 2024 was $71 million, up substantially compared to $18 million in the first quarter of last year. The Civil segment’s corresponding operating margin was 15% for the first quarter of 2024, higher than our target margin range for that segment. Building segment income from construction operations was $16 million, a significant improvement compared to the substantial loss of $70 million we recorded in the first quarter last year that had been largely attributable to an adverse legal ruling that quarter on a completed mixed use project in New York. Building segment operating margin was 3.9% in the first quarter of 2024, also nicely ahead of our target margin range for the segment. The Specialty Contractors segment posted a loss from construction operations of $18 million in the first quarter of 2024 compared to a loss of $12 million for the first quarter of last year, mostly due to the $12 million charge I mentioned this quarter, as well as an immaterial, unfavorable adjustment due to a settlement on a completed mass transit project in California. We expect improved performance from the Specialty Contractors segment over the rest of this year and are optimistic that the segment will be profitable by the end of 2024. Corporate G&A expense was $20 million in the first quarter of 2024 compared to $16 million last year, with the increase primarily due to higher compensation related expenses, mainly attributable to higher share-based compensation expense on liability classified awards resulting from the impact of the notable increase in our stock price in the first quarter of 2024. Other income was $5 million compared to $6 million last year. Interest expense for the first quarter was $19 million this year compared to $22 million last year, with the decrease driven by the absence of borrowings on our revolver and a lower balance on our term loan B, primarily resulting from the $91 million prepayment we made in February. Income tax expense was $7 million in the first quarter of 2024, with a corresponding effective tax rate of 21% compared to an income tax benefit of $48 million with an effective tax rate of 49.6% for the same quarter last year. As a reminder, the net operating losses we generated in 2022 and 2023 will help reduce our cash outlays for income taxes in 2024 and in future years. Net income attributable to Tutor Perini for the first quarter of 2024 was $16 million or $0.30 of diluted earnings per share compared to a net loss of $49 million or a loss of $0.95 per share in the first quarter of 2023. As Ron mentioned, we still anticipate double-digit revenue growth and a return to positive earnings in 2024, with substantially stronger earnings expected in 2025 and 2026. Now I’ll address the balance sheet. Our total debt as of March 31, 2024 was $801 million, down $99 million or 11% compared to $900 million as of December 31, 2023. Our total debt will come down by another $100 million next week with the redemption of our existing senior notes. As of March 31, 2024, we were in compliance with the covenants under our credit agreement and expect to continue to be in compliance in the future. And finally, as Ron mentioned, we are maintaining our 2024 EPS guidance in the range of $0.85 to $1.10. Despite our strong first quarter results, we want to maintain adequate contingency in our guidance to cover potential unforeseen events that could impact us this year. Accordingly, all the assumptions regarding our guidance that we provided last quarter remain unchanged. Thank you. And with that, I’ll turn the call back over to Ron.

Ronald Tutor: Thanks, Ryan. And at the risk of being repetitive, I’ll recap our first quarter highlights, in that we delivered strong revenue growth and profitability, particularly in our Civil business, and secondarily our building segments again reporting $0.30 a share of earnings and $98 million of strong operating cash flow. We continue to expect our operating cash flow will be strong in 2024 and 2025 as we continue to resolve the remainder of our remaining legacy disputes and collect the substantial associated cash. We are on track to deliver double-digit revenue growth and return to positive full year earnings in 2024 and anticipate significantly higher in 2025 and 2026. Our backlog should grow significantly this year and next as we continue to bid and win our share of the large volume of major near term opportunities, with extremely limited competition in the megaproject arena. Lastly, as expected, we successfully completed our debt refinancing earlier. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to the operator for questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Alex Rygiel with B. Riley FBR. Please proceed with your question.

Alex Rygiel: Ron, Gary and team, nice quarter. A couple of quick questions here. First, Ron, you mentioned a number of these large prospects you were rebidding. Can you talk a little bit about, historically, what is your success rate in winning those rebids when you had already won sort of the first round?

Ronald Tutor: Well, those happen so seldom, I can’t give you a long history, but let’s just say we’re very confident on the rebid with the lack of competition and the limited competitors.

Alex Rygiel: And then, as it relates to — and this is more for Ryan. Ryan, the Civil margins in the first quarter were very strong. You mentioned a number of things on the call here, but can you kind of just identify the one-time items that might have influenced the strength in the first quarter?

Ryan Soroka: Sure. As I mentioned, and we have it disclosed in Form 10-Q as well, there was a $10 million favorable impact to the first quarter related to a resolution on a Civil segment project here in LA.

Alex Rygiel: Excellent. And then can you help us a little bit with regards to interest expense guidance for the second quarter for the full year?

Ryan Soroka: At this point, we’re continuing to maintain our guidance for the year related to interest expense. With the refinancing, there’ll be less debt outstanding, but also at a different rate.

Alex Rygiel: Thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Steven Fisher: Thanks. Good afternoon. And nice to see the first quarter profitability there. Just to follow up on Alex’s question on the Civil segment, if you back out the $10 million, you’re just a hair under 13% margins in the first quarter in that business. So, I guess I’m just kind of curious how we think about the go-forward there. Is the backlog that you have today kind of supportive on an underlying basis of that level of margin or is it still going to kind of fluctuate around within a fairly wide range over the next few quarters?

Gary Smalley: Hi, Steve. This is Gary. Look, the nearly 13%, that’s pretty much what we’re expecting for the rest of the year. Historically, we’ve been in the 8% to 12% band. And we’ve been signaling for a while that we’re going to be north of the 12%. The work that we have in backlog, we like the quality of earnings in that work, there’s a lot of strong margin work there. So, I think that’s a pretty good proxy of how the rest of the year should play out.

Steven Fisher: Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks, Gary. And then on the specialty side of the business, I guess you adjust for the $12 million item you mentioned, still not quite profitable there. But I know you said by the end of the year. I guess what is still keeping the specialty business from being profitable in the next couple of quarters? Is it more underutilization or is it more mix still of some of these legacy projects or something else?

Gary Smalley: Yes. So there’s still some underutilization there. You’re spot on. But what we’re still facing and what we had in the quarter was really some of these legacy items, just the quarter being weighed down a little bit by that. And we were into the, we’ll say, subsequent event period and it looked like we were pretty much on budget at the time. But some of the resolution activity and then the result of one of the cases that dragged us down a little bit. So absent of that, even with the underutilization, especially in New York with the volume being somewhat low at this point, we had a pretty good quarter. So I think if you focus on litigation and resolution items, that’s really the big risk that we’re seeing right now.

Steven Fisher: Okay. And then just a follow-up on the cadence of the year. I think Ron mentioned that it’s more earnings more heavily weighted to the second half, but you did have a much better than probably typical seasonality in the first quarter. So, if we take those two things together, that might imply a fairly weak Q2. But then you did say that we should still expect 13% or so margins on the Civil business. So does that just point to basically taking a pretty conservative approach to guidance here for the year leading to potential upside? Or is there something in the second quarter that we should just be aware of to set our expectations properly around Q2?

Ronald Tutor: There’s nothing in the second quarter. The reason we’re hedging and the reason we’re taking the positions that we are, we have collected a significant amount of money. I’ve said, time and again, 2025 will be a year of settlement and collections of monies people owe us. But it’s also forced us to litigate through to conclusion and we settled major cases. So there’s always a variable and an uncertainty. I don’t have any uncertainties about operating earnings of any of the divisions. I think they’re stable in Civil. It’s terrific. However, the only issues — and it’s obvious, if our first quarter is always our worst quarter and we got $0.30 a share in earnings, you’d think we’d be predicting significantly higher for the rest of the year. However, this is, as I’ve said time and again, this is the year of all our owners come to Jesus. All of the settlements and litigations, 90% of them come to fruition this year. Most of them, we win; on occasion, we lose. That’s the only uncertainty that’s involved in this year and we’ve treated our projections accordingly. That’s why we’ve significantly increased our thoughts about 2025 and 2026 because we expect this litigation to be primarily behind us.

Steven Fisher: Sounds good. Thank you very much.

Ronald Tutor: Thanks.

Operator: Our next question comes from Abe Landau with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Ethan Kalis: Hi. This is Ethan Kalis on for Abe Landau. I guess, just first off, congrats on getting the refinancing done. That’s terrific. Our first question kind of focuses on CIE. I think in the past you provided a 10% to 12% number of sales. That number is super helpful. I guess what’s the right way to think about what normalized CIE is? Is it percentage of sales or maybe a percentage of backlog? Any color there would be helpful.

Ronald Tutor: Well, I’ve quoted in the past that I think a company of our size, assuming $5 billion to $6 billion in revenue, is going to generate anywhere from 5% to 7%, and you can expect $300 million to $400 million of BIE in various stages of disputes being resolved, but should reside in that category. And that’s our goal sometime in 2000 — by the end of 2025, no earlier than the first quarter of 2026 to get well within that range. And with any good fortune and no further delays in litigation by the first quarter of 2025. So that’s normally — because there are certain disputes — although we are negotiating in good faith and ultimately resolve them without the benefit of lawyers or litigation, they oftentimes take six months to a year of informal discussions between the principals of Tutor Perini and the principals of the owner. So those go into BIE, but the object is not to litigate, but to resolve amicably. So there’s always going to be a certain amount, and I’ve said previously, and I’ll restate, if we could expect $300 million to $400 million of CIE is reasonable. If we get much more than that, then that isn’t positive. And we’ve had years where it was less than $100 million. But that’s what I would give as guidance.

Ethan Kalis: Awesome. That’s super helpful. I guess just turning to the liability side, is there a normalized level for the billings in excess?

Ronald Tutor: Whatever we can.

Ethan Kalis: So just kind of looking forward, even targeting something in the mid-teens, just based on the types of projects that we’re bidding and the focus on these large complex, fixed price projects.

Ronald Tutor: Essentially what we do, we’ve taken a position with all our owners in an absolute mode in pre-bid discussion, so that we change contracts. We tell them we don’t finance our work, they do. So we demand and get mobilization payments, which mean, on a typical $1 billion dollar job, if we demand 8% to 10% upfront, it means they pay us $80 million to $100 million the day we set foot on the job. And their money finances the job, not ours. Now, we’ve been able to force that into being over the last 18 to 24 months, and it will continue. That’s the change in our industry from the old days when we worked on our money and they would put no money upfront. But with the diminished competition, we find ourselves able to much better negotiate terms than previously. So that’s always going to be maintained at hopefully a 15% of revenue level.

Ethan Kalis: Yes, that’s excellent.

Ronald Tutor: In other words, we want to work on the owner’s money, not ours.

Ethan Kalis: Yes, that’s excellent to see. And is the full portion of the Brooklyn jail project included in the BIE, billings in excess, or is only a portion at this point maybe related to design?

Ronald Tutor: Only the design portion, and that’s not a significant billings in excess number.

Ethan Kalis: Awesome. Thank you. And then just one last quick question to follow up on the specialty segment. Seems like Tutor Perini has done a pretty excellent job just shedding some of those unfavorable legacy projects. Have you kind of hit a trough there just in terms of revenue or is there still more to go?

Ronald Tutor: I think we’ve lowered revenue to a point where it’s fairly well leveled off. As I’ve said, we took Five Star Electric down from $600 million to where I think our comfort level is $150 million to $200 million. WDF is down from $400 million a year. I think we’re, what, $150 million to $200 million now? So we’ve leveled them off, we’ve laid off, we’ve re-managed, we put new people in place and replaced some people that were just obviously poor performers. And we think we’re down to a nucleus and a revenue base that we can return to a level of profitability. But to say they’ve been reduced in size as a part of our operation would be obvious.

Ethan Kalis: Awesome, I’ll leave it there. Thank you.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Ronald Tutor for closing comments.

Ronald Tutor: Thank you, everybody, so much, and we’ll look forward to the next quarterly call.

Operator: This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Investing.com– Oil prices fell Monday, as fresh peace talks between Israel and militant group Hamas in Cairo cooled bets of a wider conflict in the Middle East disrupting supplies.

At 14:15 ET (18:15 GMT), fell 1.3% to $87.02 a barrel, while fell 4.6% to $82.50 a barrel. 

Middle East peace talks 

In a sign of fresh hope for a temporary truce in the Gaza war, an Israel delegation is reportedly expected in Cairo on Tuesday just as Hamas weighs up Tel Aviv’s latest deal that includes the exchange of hostages for a broader ceasfire.   

A Hamas delegation will visit Cairo on Monday for talks aimed at securing a ceasefire, a Hamas official told Reuters on Sunday, with the group expected to respond to Israel’s latest Gaza phased truce proposal delivered on Saturday.

Concerns that the conflict between Hamas and Israel would balloon into a wider war in the oil-rich region prompted sharp gains earlier this month, as traders worried that this could result in a big hit to supplies from the region.

Geopolitical tensions, tight supply bets persist 

The specter of geopolitical tensions and potential supply risks in oil markets still remained in play.

Ukraine attacked more Russian oil refineries over the weekend, while also calling on more military aid from the U.S. over worsening conditions on the front lines. 

Attacks on Russian refineries factored into bets on tighter supplies, especially as Russia announced more production and export cuts earlier this year. 

(Peter Nurse, Ambar Warrick contributed to this article.)